West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Jared Taylor on July 04, 2009, 12:20:47 PM

Title: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 04, 2009, 12:20:47 PM
An illiterate monkey named Daygostylz claims that blacks invented a whole bunch of stuff (i.e. peanut butter, traffic lights, etc.) and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity. Actually, blacks invented almost nothing. I recommend this site for refutations to many of the myths being perpetuated by revisionist black and leftist historians:

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

If blacks were really capable of inventing much at all, Africa wouldn't be such a shit hole. Most Africans today live the same way that they did thousands of years ago. The reason for this is that those people are not capable of the same intelligence as whites, or even African-Americans. The average white IQ is 100, the average black IQ in the U.S. is 85, and the average African IQ is 70 (read: borderline mental retardation). Is it not obvious by now that nature intends for blacks to go extinct, because they are incapable of contributing anything of relevance to humankind? Species go extinct all the time. So do races of human beings. There's no reason anyone should miss blacks once AIDS has killed them off.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 04, 2009, 12:34:11 PM
how bout egypt?
they started civilisation FFS.

and they created every type of rim other then the factory rims.
let's be true white people don't give a fuck about shining rims
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 04, 2009, 12:40:01 PM
how bout egypt?
they started civilisation FFS.

and they created every type of rim other then the factory rims.
let's be true white people don't give a fuck about shining rims


The ancient Egyptians were not black. And even then, the Jews built almost everything (including the pyramids).

I'm pretty sure even the rims that blacks like were invented by whites. But even if blacks invented them, who cares? Those rims showcase how dumb the negroes are.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 04, 2009, 01:37:38 PM
lol@ this trailer trash.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 04, 2009, 01:52:48 PM
and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity.

One more thing. I'm illiterate but never once did I say that.  Work on your reading skills.  Now, its natural for you to assume someone would think you are retarded. Inbreeding often leads to some sort of birth defects and I am quite sure your mothers inbreeding has left you retarded.  Keep trying alias.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 04, 2009, 02:32:50 PM
Oh, wow, he responds with redneck stereotypes about inbreeding. I'm sure he was up all night thinking of those.

and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity.

One more thing. I'm illiterate but never once did I say that.  Work on your reading skills.  Now, its natural for you to assume someone would think you are retarded. Inbreeding often leads to some sort of birth defects and I am quite sure your mothers inbreeding has left you retarded.  Keep trying alias.

You pretty much implied it.  You are capable of grasping language subtleties, right?

Anyway, I notice you seem unable to respond to my refutation of your argument that you believed was so clever when you made it. You got "schooled", boy.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 04, 2009, 03:31:43 PM
Oh, wow, he responds with redneck stereotypes about inbreeding. I'm sure he was up all night thinking of those.

and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity.

One more thing. I'm illiterate but never once did I say that.  Work on your reading skills.  Now, its natural for you to assume someone would think you are retarded. Inbreeding often leads to some sort of birth defects and I am quite sure your mothers inbreeding has left you retarded.  Keep trying alias.

You pretty much implied it.  You are capable of grasping language subtleties, right?

Anyway, I notice you seem unable to respond to my refutation of your argument that you believed was so clever when you made it. You got "schooled", boy.

lol@ you
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 04, 2009, 03:40:31 PM
Oh, wow, he responds with redneck stereotypes about inbreeding. I'm sure he was up all night thinking of those.

and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity.

One more thing. I'm illiterate but never once did I say that.  Work on your reading skills.  Now, its natural for you to assume someone would think you are retarded. Inbreeding often leads to some sort of birth defects and I am quite sure your mothers inbreeding has left you retarded.  Keep trying alias.

You pretty much implied it.  You are capable of grasping language subtleties, right?

Anyway, I notice you seem unable to respond to my refutation of your argument that you believed was so clever when you made it. You got "schooled", boy.

lol@ you
I agree with him, you need to go to school, so you can learn that you need to ignore retards like that
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 04, 2009, 03:50:22 PM
I'm one of the top racial-realist thinkers in this country. The losers like yourselves who try to act black and listen to rap music are the ones who are retarded.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 04, 2009, 04:08:16 PM
^^LOL. Keep em comin loser!  Youre fuckin hilarious....youre on a roll!!

First off, youre not that idiot Jared Taylor. Youre some loser kid who spends his time attempting to spread racism on a Hip-Hop message board.  You are pathetic lol. 80% of your own race is ashamed of people like you and would prefer to pretend that you dont exist.  How does that feel?  To be so insignificant I mean.  It's just so sad that you can't see how much of a joke you are to people, and that any attention you receive on this message board is only because people love a clown. You are a clown lol.  So keep up the act loser.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 05, 2009, 10:44:08 AM
It's obvious that you feel threatened by my presence. You know I was right about blacks not inventing the things you claimed, and you have no response. You failed, big time.

Oh, yeah, and Hurricane Carter was obviously guilty.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 05, 2009, 11:46:31 AM
It's obvious that you feel threatened by my presence. You know I was right about blacks not inventing the things you claimed, and you have no response. You failed, big time.

Oh, yeah, and Hurricane Carter was obviously guilty.

There is no response needed when dealing with someone as ignorant as yourself. Responding to you're arguments would only give them more merit then they deserve, not to mention be a complete waste of my time. It's like presenting logic in an argument with a Christian nut. As I said before, you are pathetic. I feel sorry for you, as do most of your own people.  It must be nice being so ashamed of who you are that you need to pretend to be another person on a message board. lol
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Sparegeez on July 05, 2009, 02:40:20 PM
What about Latinos and Asians? Where do they rank on your scale?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on July 05, 2009, 03:33:05 PM
so since blacks didnt invent anything they are in a shit hole? (the one theyre in)
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 05, 2009, 04:05:21 PM
What about Latinos and Asians? Where do they rank on your scale?

I don't have a scale. But I can tell you that studies have shown Latinos are more intelligent than blacks, whites are more intelligent than Latinos, and Asians are more intelligent than the other three. But I figured this was common sense?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on July 05, 2009, 04:07:07 PM
aite yeah asians are more smart IMO, buit what if the other races acted "less inteligent" til now and all of a sudden surpass the asians and start inventin all kinds of stuff etc...and jus take over this world lol
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 05, 2009, 04:07:49 PM
There is no response needed when dealing with someone as ignorant as yourself. Responding to you're arguments would only give them more merit then they deserve, not to mention be a complete waste of my time. It's like presenting logic in an argument with a Christian nut. As I said before, you are pathetic. I feel sorry for you, as do most of your own people.  It must be nice being so ashamed of who you are that you need to pretend to be another person on a message board. lol

If I am ignorant, then don't think the burden is on the naysayers (read: yourself) to actually PROVE that I am ignorant, instead of just taking for granted the liberal consensus around you?

I regard you as pathetic and a waste of my time, but I at least found a site that refutes your bullshit arguments. If you are not capable of doing the same, then it must be assumed that you are not confident in your own arguments and that you cannot back them up. What's the old saying? "Post proof or retract"? Oh, yeah, and then there's another that applies equally to you: FAIL.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Sparegeez on July 05, 2009, 05:13:53 PM
What about Latinos and Asians? Where do they rank on your scale?

I don't have a scale. But I can tell you that studies have shown Latinos are more intelligent than blacks, whites are more intelligent than Latinos, and Asians are more intelligent than the other three. But I figured this was common sense?

do you have any citations for what you're saying?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 05, 2009, 05:24:02 PM
do you have any citations for what you're saying?

http://www.amazon.com/Bell-Curve-Intelligence-Structure-Paperbacks/dp/0684824299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1246839794&sr=8-1
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 05, 2009, 08:28:59 PM
There is no response needed when dealing with someone as ignorant as yourself. Responding to you're arguments would only give them more merit then they deserve, not to mention be a complete waste of my time. It's like presenting logic in an argument with a Christian nut. As I said before, you are pathetic. I feel sorry for you, as do most of your own people.  It must be nice being so ashamed of who you are that you need to pretend to be another person on a message board. lol

If I am ignorant, then don't think the burden is on the naysayers (read: yourself) to actually PROVE that I am ignorant, instead of just taking for granted the liberal consensus around you?

I regard you as pathetic and a waste of my time, but I at least found a site that refutes your bullshit arguments. If you are not capable of doing the same, then it must be assumed that you are not confident in your own arguments and that you cannot back them up. What's the old saying? "Post proof or retract"? Oh, yeah, and then there's another that applies equally to you: FAIL.

Keep "spitting the truth" Jared Taylor LOL.  Assuming you have friends (big assumption), do they know you spend your time pretending to be a racist idiot on a hip-hop message board? lol  Talk about a failure.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Blasphemy on July 05, 2009, 11:25:42 PM
It's obvious that you feel threatened by my presence. You know I was right about blacks not inventing the things you claimed, and you have no response. You failed, big time.

Oh, yeah, and Hurricane Carter was obviously guilty.

There is no response needed when dealing with someone as ignorant as yourself. Responding to you're arguments would only give them more merit then they deserve, not to mention be a complete waste of my time. It's like presenting logic in an argument with a Christian nut. As I said before, you are pathetic. I feel sorry for you, as do most of your own people.  It must be nice being so ashamed of who you are that you need to pretend to be another person on a message board. lol

Everything after that just becomes ironic/funny lol
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: StreetsAllSalute on July 06, 2009, 03:58:08 AM
jareds mad hes daughter gettin pounded by a ne-gro!!(or five!!) ;D
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 06, 2009, 09:32:18 AM
There is no response needed when dealing with someone as ignorant as yourself. Responding to you're arguments would only give them more merit then they deserve, not to mention be a complete waste of my time. It's like presenting logic in an argument with a Christian nut. As I said before, you are pathetic. I feel sorry for you, as do most of your own people.  It must be nice being so ashamed of who you are that you need to pretend to be another person on a message board. lol

If I am ignorant, then don't think the burden is on the naysayers (read: yourself) to actually PROVE that I am ignorant, instead of just taking for granted the liberal consensus around you?

I regard you as pathetic and a waste of my time, but I at least found a site that refutes your bullshit arguments. If you are not capable of doing the same, then it must be assumed that you are not confident in your own arguments and that you cannot back them up. What's the old saying? "Post proof or retract"? Oh, yeah, and then there's another that applies equally to you: FAIL.

you have a very calm personality with all the hostility you're creating you're pretty calm...
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 06, 2009, 09:34:46 AM
YOU KNOW WHAT I  THINK IS GONNA HAPPEN...
Jared is going to come out of the closet like James Strom Thurmond did...
he fought so many years for blacks to have rights... then turned out... he had a 1/2 black daughter that he secretively had...
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: C-BLUE on July 06, 2009, 11:18:07 AM
An illiterate monkey named Daygostylz claims that blacks invented a whole bunch of stuff (i.e. peanut butter, traffic lights, etc.) and that I'm retarded for not appreciating the depths of black ingenuity. Actually, blacks invented almost nothing. I recommend this site for refutations to many of the myths being perpetuated by revisionist black and leftist historians:

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

If blacks were really capable of inventing much at all, Africa wouldn't be such a shit hole. Most Africans today live the same way that they did thousands of years ago. The reason for this is that those people are not capable of the same intelligence as whites, or even African-Americans. The average white IQ is 100, the average black IQ in the U.S. is 85, and the average African IQ is 70 (read: borderline mental retardation). Is it not obvious by now that nature intends for blacks to go extinct, because they are incapable of contributing anything of relevance to humankind? Species go extinct all the time. So do races of human beings. There's no reason anyone should miss blacks once AIDS has killed them off.

FIRST OF ALL...GO FUCC YOUR MOTHER IN THE ASS. YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THE REASON FOR THE STATE OF AFRICA IS CUZ OF AFRICANS HAVE LOWER IQS??..WHERE THE FUCC DO THESE TESTS COMES FROM?. THAT SHIT AINT GOT SHIT TO DO WIT AFRICANS. THATS A WHITE MANS TEST AND I AINT SAYIN THESE TESTS DONT APPLY IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES...IM SURE THEY FUCCIN DO. THE FUCCIN REASON FOR AFRICA BEIN A FUCCED UP MUTHAFUCCIN CONTINENT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WIT COLONIZATION AND THE CULTURE THAT THRIVES OVER THERE. THE WAY THEY LOOK AT TIME, FAMILY, THEMSELVES. ITS ALL ABOUT THE GROUP, TRADITIONS, GOD. THATS WHATS SLOWIN THESE MUTHAFUCCAS DOWN. HERE ON THE WEST WE GOT THE BITCH ASS CHURCH CUZZ..AND THATS ALL TRADITIONS HOMIE AND THATS WHATS STILL SLOWIN DOWN THE WEST. THERES STILL MUTHAFUCCAS OUT THERE WHO DONT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION..DONT BELIEVE IN ANAL SEX..GAMBLIN..FINGER FUCCIN BIRDS..PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHIN THATS FUN..BUT THEY BELIEVE IN JESUS WALKIN ON WATER...JONAH IN THE MUTHAFUCCIN WHALE!!!!!. THIS IS WHAT THE GOOD CHURCH DID..YOU TELL ONE STORY TOO MUCH AND PEOPLE ARE GONNA BELIEVE IT AND ACCEPT IT AS REALITY. WORDS LIKE EVIDENCE, REASON, LOGIC..THEY ARE MEANINGLESS HERE. BOTTOM LINE..THE AFRICANS IN AFRICA IS JUST AS SMART AS YOU CUZZ. YOUR IQ TEST AINT WORTH A BUCCET OF PISS. 8)
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 07, 2009, 01:39:09 AM
jareds mad hes daughter gettin pounded by a ne-gro!!(or five!!) ;D

i feel bad for the dude's opinions
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Digital Pimpin' on July 07, 2009, 01:42:51 AM
Pfft. Blacks invent excuses all the time.

/jk
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 07, 2009, 03:59:28 PM
you have a very calm personality with all the hostility you're creating you're pretty calm...

That's because I am confident that I am right. These other people aren't. That is why they try and ridicule me with lame insults (like saying my daughter's fucking a negro...LAME). But I see right through them. I know that what I say shakes them up. If they were confident in their beliefs, they would see no need to mock me. Instead, they would be capable of rational, calm discourse. That none of them are demonstrates fear.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 07, 2009, 04:06:49 PM
FIRST OF ALL...GO FUCC YOUR MOTHER IN THE ASS. YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THE REASON FOR THE STATE OF AFRICA IS CUZ OF AFRICANS HAVE LOWER IQS??..WHERE THE FUCC DO THESE TESTS COMES FROM?. THAT SHIT AINT GOT SHIT TO DO WIT AFRICANS. THATS A WHITE MANS TEST AND I AINT SAYIN THESE TESTS DONT APPLY IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES...IM SURE THEY FUCCIN DO. THE FUCCIN REASON FOR AFRICA BEIN A FUCCED UP MUTHAFUCCIN CONTINENT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WIT COLONIZATION AND THE CULTURE THAT THRIVES OVER THERE. THE WAY THEY LOOK AT TIME, FAMILY, THEMSELVES. ITS ALL ABOUT THE GROUP, TRADITIONS, GOD. THATS WHATS SLOWIN THESE MUTHAFUCCAS DOWN. HERE ON THE WEST WE GOT THE BITCH ASS CHURCH CUZZ..AND THATS ALL TRADITIONS HOMIE AND THATS WHATS STILL SLOWIN DOWN THE WEST. THERES STILL MUTHAFUCCAS OUT THERE WHO DONT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION..DONT BELIEVE IN ANAL SEX..GAMBLIN..FINGER FUCCIN BIRDS..PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHIN THATS FUN..BUT THEY BELIEVE IN JESUS WALKIN ON WATER...JONAH IN THE MUTHAFUCCIN WHALE!!!!!. THIS IS WHAT THE GOOD CHURCH DID..YOU TELL ONE STORY TOO MUCH AND PEOPLE ARE GONNA BELIEVE IT AND ACCEPT IT AS REALITY. WORDS LIKE EVIDENCE, REASON, LOGIC..THEY ARE MEANINGLESS HERE. BOTTOM LINE..THE AFRICANS IN AFRICA IS JUST AS SMART AS YOU CUZZ. YOUR IQ TEST AINT WORTH A BUCCET OF PISS. 8)

First of all, are you actually claiming a particular Crip 'hood? If you're not, then you shouldn't be typing like a Crip (like saying "fucc"). Second, if you are actually a banger (which I doubt), then you're a fucking loser who's gonna either end up in the pen or in the grave, in which case, you demonstrate your idiocy.

Anyway, colonization has almost nothing to do with Africa's problems. Most of Africa's wars aren't between particular ethnic groups; they're over who controls the capital so that they can loot the treasury. They're all intra-state in origin, and rarely conform neatly to ethnic or tribal lines. Not to mention that Somalia is an extremely ethnically homogeneous country (95% of the population is ethnically Somali), yet it's also quite possibly the least stable country in Africa. If Africa's problems were really the result of colonization and the Europeans failing to respect ethnic boundaries, then how do you explain Somalia?

I'm also not sure what religion has to do with it. Not that I think the Catholic Church is helping by being against contraception, but the fact is that people who are Christian in America don't fight civil wars with their neighbors where they do barbaric shit like chopping off each other's arms and legs. That's the kind of shit that only Africans do to each other, and it is due to their savagery.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: C-BLUE on July 08, 2009, 05:47:46 PM
FIRST OF ALL...GO FUCC YOUR MOTHER IN THE ASS. YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THE REASON FOR THE STATE OF AFRICA IS CUZ OF AFRICANS HAVE LOWER IQS??..WHERE THE FUCC DO THESE TESTS COMES FROM?. THAT SHIT AINT GOT SHIT TO DO WIT AFRICANS. THATS A WHITE MANS TEST AND I AINT SAYIN THESE TESTS DONT APPLY IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES...IM SURE THEY FUCCIN DO. THE FUCCIN REASON FOR AFRICA BEIN A FUCCED UP MUTHAFUCCIN CONTINENT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WIT COLONIZATION AND THE CULTURE THAT THRIVES OVER THERE. THE WAY THEY LOOK AT TIME, FAMILY, THEMSELVES. ITS ALL ABOUT THE GROUP, TRADITIONS, GOD. THATS WHATS SLOWIN THESE MUTHAFUCCAS DOWN. HERE ON THE WEST WE GOT THE BITCH ASS CHURCH CUZZ..AND THATS ALL TRADITIONS HOMIE AND THATS WHATS STILL SLOWIN DOWN THE WEST. THERES STILL MUTHAFUCCAS OUT THERE WHO DONT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION..DONT BELIEVE IN ANAL SEX..GAMBLIN..FINGER FUCCIN BIRDS..PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHIN THATS FUN..BUT THEY BELIEVE IN JESUS WALKIN ON WATER...JONAH IN THE MUTHAFUCCIN WHALE!!!!!. THIS IS WHAT THE GOOD CHURCH DID..YOU TELL ONE STORY TOO MUCH AND PEOPLE ARE GONNA BELIEVE IT AND ACCEPT IT AS REALITY. WORDS LIKE EVIDENCE, REASON, LOGIC..THEY ARE MEANINGLESS HERE. BOTTOM LINE..THE AFRICANS IN AFRICA IS JUST AS SMART AS YOU CUZZ. YOUR IQ TEST AINT WORTH A BUCCET OF PISS. 8)

First of all, are you actually claiming a particular Crip 'hood? If you're not, then you shouldn't be typing like a Crip (like saying "fucc"). Second, if you are actually a banger (which I doubt), then you're a fucking loser who's gonna either end up in the pen or in the grave, in which case, you demonstrate your idiocy.

Anyway, colonization has almost nothing to do with Africa's problems. Most of Africa's wars aren't between particular ethnic groups; they're over who controls the capital so that they can loot the treasury. They're all intra-state in origin, and rarely conform neatly to ethnic or tribal lines. Not to mention that Somalia is an extremely ethnically homogeneous country (95% of the population is ethnically Somali), yet it's also quite possibly the least stable country in Africa. If Africa's problems were really the result of colonization and the Europeans failing to respect ethnic boundaries, then how do you explain Somalia?

I'm also not sure what religion has to do with it. Not that I think the Catholic Church is helping by being against contraception, but the fact is that people who are Christian in America don't fight civil wars with their neighbors where they do barbaric shit like chopping off each other's arms and legs. That's the kind of shit that only Africans do to each other, and it is due to their savagery.

it's not just colonization but much of the shit can be traced bacc to that homie. a lot of these countries are bein run by corrupt governments and so theyre stucc in this very unfair market system. and im a agree wit u wit the etnic groups..they got a thousand languages..thousand tribes and nobody fuccin likes each other but did you know the british played into that. so did portugal and belgium and i'm pretty sure the germans were no exception. its easy to start problems between tribes when you the nigga wit all the money..all you need is one homeboy tribe. you probably read the bell curve one time too many. if you wanna believe in that shit go right a fuccin head man but you really need to wake the fucc up. the white race is not superior to the blacc one. we all equals homie. why the fucc do u post here anyway?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 08, 2009, 07:09:44 PM
FIRST OF ALL...GO FUCC YOUR MOTHER IN THE ASS. YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THE REASON FOR THE STATE OF AFRICA IS CUZ OF AFRICANS HAVE LOWER IQS??..WHERE THE FUCC DO THESE TESTS COMES FROM?. THAT SHIT AINT GOT SHIT TO DO WIT AFRICANS. THATS A WHITE MANS TEST AND I AINT SAYIN THESE TESTS DONT APPLY IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES...IM SURE THEY FUCCIN DO. THE FUCCIN REASON FOR AFRICA BEIN A FUCCED UP MUTHAFUCCIN CONTINENT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WIT COLONIZATION AND THE CULTURE THAT THRIVES OVER THERE. THE WAY THEY LOOK AT TIME, FAMILY, THEMSELVES. ITS ALL ABOUT THE GROUP, TRADITIONS, GOD. THATS WHATS SLOWIN THESE MUTHAFUCCAS DOWN. HERE ON THE WEST WE GOT THE BITCH ASS CHURCH CUZZ..AND THATS ALL TRADITIONS HOMIE AND THATS WHATS STILL SLOWIN DOWN THE WEST. THERES STILL MUTHAFUCCAS OUT THERE WHO DONT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION..DONT BELIEVE IN ANAL SEX..GAMBLIN..FINGER FUCCIN BIRDS..PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHIN THATS FUN..BUT THEY BELIEVE IN JESUS WALKIN ON WATER...JONAH IN THE MUTHAFUCCIN WHALE!!!!!. THIS IS WHAT THE GOOD CHURCH DID..YOU TELL ONE STORY TOO MUCH AND PEOPLE ARE GONNA BELIEVE IT AND ACCEPT IT AS REALITY. WORDS LIKE EVIDENCE, REASON, LOGIC..THEY ARE MEANINGLESS HERE. BOTTOM LINE..THE AFRICANS IN AFRICA IS JUST AS SMART AS YOU CUZZ. YOUR IQ TEST AINT WORTH A BUCCET OF PISS. 8)

First of all, are you actually claiming a particular Crip 'hood? If you're not, then you shouldn't be typing like a Crip (like saying "fucc"). Second, if you are actually a banger (which I doubt), then you're a fucking loser who's gonna either end up in the pen or in the grave, in which case, you demonstrate your idiocy.

Anyway, colonization has almost nothing to do with Africa's problems. Most of Africa's wars aren't between particular ethnic groups; they're over who controls the capital so that they can loot the treasury. They're all intra-state in origin, and rarely conform neatly to ethnic or tribal lines. Not to mention that Somalia is an extremely ethnically homogeneous country (95% of the population is ethnically Somali), yet it's also quite possibly the least stable country in Africa. If Africa's problems were really the result of colonization and the Europeans failing to respect ethnic boundaries, then how do you explain Somalia?

I'm also not sure what religion has to do with it. Not that I think the Catholic Church is helping by being against contraception, but the fact is that people who are Christian in America don't fight civil wars with their neighbors where they do barbaric shit like chopping off each other's arms and legs. That's the kind of shit that only Africans do to each other, and it is due to their savagery.
colonization is the direct cause.
It's true the conflicts are between seperate ethnic diversities.
We stopped the violence during colonial times but that doesn't stop the conflict. You would hate black people more if you got locked in a cel with one for a while.
Above that the borders were NOT changed wich would have stopped most of the violence before it started because every ethnicity would have had there own country.
Instead we put one ethnicity incharge, which means the ethnicity in charge would treat all the other people as 'inferiour' to them. Which caused a civil war going on in every country in africa.
Some people see a way to benefit from this chaos and start creating a small army, some slave labour to mine sultin (the main componant of mobile phones) and the infamous blood diamonds; and eventually feed a war.

Africa is stuck in a vicieus cicle, all we can do is let them figure it out for ourselves.

Europe had to do it themselves too and they ended up well

Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: K-MACC on July 08, 2009, 09:39:08 PM
Pfft. Blacks invent excuses all the time.

/jk
lol
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: C-BLUE on July 09, 2009, 11:16:13 AM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 09, 2009, 11:43:30 AM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz

Why are u wasting youre time with this moron? The reason I try not to argue with this fool too much, is because me giving him my attention only validates himself in his own eyes. He suffers from severe self-esteem issues and that is obvious. Not to mention, he's only an alias.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: J Bananas on July 09, 2009, 12:20:23 PM
Pfft. Blacks invent excuses all the time.

/jk
lol

lmao
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: J Bananas on July 09, 2009, 12:21:08 PM
lol @ all the blacks getting enraged and trying to piece together cohesive arguments, so far all i hear is excuses.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: K-MACC on July 09, 2009, 01:03:25 PM
lol @ all the blacks getting enraged and trying to piece together cohesive arguments, so far all i hear is excuses.
cosign
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Triple OG Rapsodie on July 09, 2009, 04:27:19 PM
The real Jared Taylor is supposed to be "an intellectual." This guy is an idiot. I call alias. Who's more of a lowlife than a white supremacist? A guy impersonating one. Doesn't this board have any mods? Who is this guy?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 09, 2009, 06:02:44 PM
hy are u wasting youre time with this moron? The reason I try not to argue with this fool too much, is because me giving him my attention only validates himself in his own eyes. He suffers from severe self-esteem issues and that is obvious. Not to mention, he's only an alias.

Nope, you avoid addressing my arguments is because you can't. You lack the intellectual capacity to debate with me.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 09, 2009, 06:07:36 PM
it's not just colonization but much of the shit can be traced bacc to that homie. a lot of these countries are bein run by corrupt governments and so theyre stucc in this very unfair market system. and im a agree wit u wit the etnic groups..they got a thousand languages..thousand tribes and nobody fuccin likes each other but did you know the british played into that. so did portugal and belgium and i'm pretty sure the germans were no exception. its easy to start problems between tribes when you the nigga wit all the money..all you need is one homeboy tribe. you probably read the bell curve one time too many. if you wanna believe in that shit go right a fuccin head man but you really need to wake the fucc up. the white race is not superior to the blacc one. we all equals homie. why the fucc do u post here anyway?

colonization is the direct cause.
It's true the conflicts are between seperate ethnic diversities.
We stopped the violence during colonial times but that doesn't stop the conflict. You would hate black people more if you got locked in a cel with one for a while.
Above that the borders were NOT changed wich would have stopped most of the violence before it started because every ethnicity would have had there own country.
Instead we put one ethnicity incharge, which means the ethnicity in charge would treat all the other people as 'inferiour' to them. Which caused a civil war going on in every country in africa.
Some people see a way to benefit from this chaos and start creating a small army, some slave labour to mine sultin (the main componant of mobile phones) and the infamous blood diamonds; and eventually feed a war.

Africa is stuck in a vicieus cicle, all we can do is let them figure it out for ourselves.

Europe had to do it themselves too and they ended up well



Good! See, now that wasn't so bad now, was it? Address my arguments instead of trying to mock me, and you lend yourselves credibility. Thank you for showing that you are capable of rational debate. It makes your side look as though it's capable of defending itself, instead of just silencing anyone they don't agree with. That's what the Marxists used to do, and I'd hope you don't want to be compared to them.

Anyway, yes, it is true that Europeans played into tribal rivalries, but what I postulate is that (A.) None of Africa's current wars have anything to do with tribal rivalries (except for a few, like the Ethiopia-Eritrea war), and (B.) What does it say about Africans that they were unable to invent a civilization and were thus an easy target for Europeans?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Jared Taylor on July 09, 2009, 06:09:49 PM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz

Right, there are clans in Somalia. The issue is which clan gets to control the capital so that they can loot the treasury for themselves. It demonstrates a collective failure to create a nation-state, which, I'm afraid, characterizes much of Africa. This is not the Europeans' fault; it demonstrates that Africans are tribal. You think of yourself as a Crip? Well, the whole feud between Crips and Bloods is basically Africa in our midst. It demonstrates that blacks have a genetic predisposition to act tribal and violent towards each other.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on July 09, 2009, 06:14:17 PM
yeah thats what ive been thinkin from seein his posts
hes a new poster and he goes str8 into "white power" type shit
thats hard to believe
maybe its jobs other half lol



The real Jared Taylor is supposed to be "an intellectual." This guy is an idiot. I call alias. Who's more of a lowlife than a white supremacist? A guy impersonating one. Doesn't this board have any mods? Who is this guy?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 09, 2009, 11:13:15 PM
hy are u wasting youre time with this moron? The reason I try not to argue with this fool too much, is because me giving him my attention only validates himself in his own eyes. He suffers from severe self-esteem issues and that is obvious. Not to mention, he's only an alias.

Nope, you avoid addressing my arguments is because you can't. You lack the intellectual capacity to debate with me.

lol@ you
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 10, 2009, 03:27:34 AM
colonization is the direct cause.
It's true the conflicts are between separate ethnic diversities.
We stopped the violence during colonial times but that doesn't stop the conflict. You would hate black people more if you got locked in a cel with one for a while.
Above that the borders were NOT changed which would have stopped most of the violence before it started because every ethnicity would have had there own country.
Instead we put one ethnicity in charge, which means the ethnicity in charge would treat all the other people as 'inferior' to them. Which caused a civil war going on in every country in Africa.
Some people see a way to benefit from this chaos and start creating a small army, some slave labour to mine sultan (the main component of mobile phones) and the infamous blood diamonds; and eventually feed a war.

Africa is stuck in a vicious circle, all we can do is let them figure it out for ourselves.

Europe had to do it themselves too and they ended up well



Good! See, now that wasn't so bad now, was it? Address my arguments instead of trying to mock me, and you lend yourselves credibility. Thank you for showing that you are capable of rational debate. It makes your side look as though it's capable of defending itself, instead of just silencing anyone they don't agree with. That's what the Marxists used to do, and I'd hope you don't want to be compared to them.

Anyway, yes, it is true that Europeans played into tribal rivalries, but what I postulate is that (A.) None of Africa's current wars have anything to do with tribal rivalries (except for a few, like the Ethiopia-Eritrea war), and (B.) What does it say about Africans that they were unable to invent a civilization and were thus an easy target for Europeans?
How about the Rwandan Civil War between the Tutsi's and the Hutu's. That conflict comes from tribal times.

Actually Africa has invented Civilization, look at Egypt, but they created a civilization they wanted to live in, no need for any development because they were happy.

Africa is not that different from America, can you see any difference between Detroit and Cape Town?
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 10, 2009, 08:36:24 AM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz
YOU'RE RIGHT... in America there are white gangs fighting other white gangs...
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 10, 2009, 08:38:10 AM
lots of people can be from the same ethnic group (color, demographics, etc) but they might have feud of some sort...
and fight each other... so Somalia or other countries in African Continent have beef they have beef... Of course most of this beef is dumb... but European Countries have beef against each other too...
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Digital Pimpin' on July 10, 2009, 08:45:29 AM
Eye don't remember either of the World Wars (or any of the great wars in history) escalating from black tribal beef.

It was various white men imposing their views of 'civilization' onto other countries. That's what eye think.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 10, 2009, 08:52:04 AM
Eye don't remember either of the World Wars (or any of the great wars in history) escalating from black tribal beef.

It was various white men imposing their views of 'civilization' onto other countries. That's what eye think.
No because there weren't any tribes In Europe...

ever since the unification of Germany they have been in war with the french. First the French-German war, then WW1 then WW2
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: C-BLUE on July 11, 2009, 12:10:44 PM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz

Right, there are clans in Somalia. The issue is which clan gets to control the capital so that they can loot the treasury for themselves. It demonstrates a collective failure to create a nation-state, which, I'm afraid, characterizes much of Africa. This is not the Europeans' fault; it demonstrates that Africans are tribal. You think of yourself as a Crip? Well, the whole feud between Crips and Bloods is basically Africa in our midst. It demonstrates that blacks have a genetic predisposition to act tribal and violent towards each other.


You say none of Africas current wars have anything to do with tribal rivalries. Well we still have tons of different tribes there and many of these muthafuccas dont even speak the same language. In Nigeria alone they have over 500 living languages (and Yeah I am aware of that most of these languages arent widespread BUT they still pose a problem!). So what we have is different cultures, different traditions and it's just a major problem of communication. That's one major problem out of a 100 major problems these people are dealing with and some of them arent even dealing with it. It's a cycle homie and its very difficult to break these types of cycles. Now you would say 'how come they're in this cycle and how come the white Europeans aren't?'. You also asked 'what does it say about Africans when theyre unable to invent a civilization and thus an easty target to Europeans?'. Its never easy to answer such questions but its very easy to blame this on lacc of intelligence. Certain cultures and this is particularly true with Africa put a stop to all possible progress. They don't believe in technology, they believe in nature and consider themselves a pawn of nature. And this is so rooted in them. If you're born to parents who idolize this type of thinking and everybody around them do also chances are youre gonna be just like them. These people get help from us and they never get why we're always tryin' to get shit done quiccly. For them..there is always time. To us...everybody is runnin' out if time. In order for this to change you need to change their entire fuccin mindset and I believe that shit is possible. The answer to this is education and if education was accessible to every fuccin child in Africa you is gonna see some fuccin changes. I guarantee you homie. This would also take care of the biggest problem of all...the population problem. An average woman is givin birth to six to seven fuccin kids over there and why?. 1) religion...they dont believe in birth control, 2) its a sign of manhood to have a lot of kids, 3) a woman with many kids gets more respect and 4) more kids means more work. This is tradition. Same thing with the fuccin taliban muthafuccas and a lot of muslim muthafuccas..they think technology is somehow evil. Women shouldnt be allowed to read a fuccin book..get the fucc outta here cuzz. And then we got the Amish and these are all white muthafuccas. Lacc of intelligence?. Im sorry cuzz I need more than that. The people in Africa need to read a fuccin book and we need money to publish books. Even if these muthafuccas don't understand time I believe time will be there only friend. More Oprahs, more schools and chances are the young generations will embrace a different type of thinkin'.

And as far as the Crips and bloods go may seem moronic to you but to a muthafucca whos had his own brother shot dead infront of his eyes and knows the cops aint gonna do a fuccin thing about it --its a whole different chess game. Yes it is a cycle. It's a cycle of violence and that cycle aint gonna stop even if you want it to stop. I believe it can be stopped but right now the problem is too deep.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 11, 2009, 06:10:03 PM
i see your point...
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Triple OG Rapsodie on July 11, 2009, 06:16:50 PM
and as far as somalia goes it doesnt fuccin matter if they're all the same ethnic group...its still different groups wit different agendas. does that mean they stupid?? fucc nahh...it's easy to assume someone is stupid but theres just a lot more to it cuzz

Right, there are clans in Somalia. The issue is which clan gets to control the capital so that they can loot the treasury for themselves. It demonstrates a collective failure to create a nation-state, which, I'm afraid, characterizes much of Africa. This is not the Europeans' fault; it demonstrates that Africans are tribal. You think of yourself as a Crip? Well, the whole feud between Crips and Bloods is basically Africa in our midst. It demonstrates that blacks have a genetic predisposition to act tribal and violent towards each other.


You say none of Africas current wars have anything to do with tribal rivalries. Well we still have tons of different tribes there and many of these muthafuccas dont even speak the same language. In Nigeria alone they have over 500 living languages (and Yeah I am aware of that most of these languages arent widespread BUT they still pose a problem!). So what we have is different cultures, different traditions and it's just a major problem of communication. That's one major problem out of a 100 major problems these people are dealing with and some of them arent even dealing with it. It's a cycle homie and its very difficult to break these types of cycles. Now you would say 'how come they're in this cycle and how come the white Europeans aren't?'. You also asked 'what does it say about Africans when theyre unable to invent a civilization and thus an easty target to Europeans?'. Its never easy to answer such questions but its very easy to blame this on lacc of intelligence. Certain cultures and this is particularly true with Africa put a stop to all possible progress. They don't believe in technology, they believe in nature and consider themselves a pawn of nature. And this is so rooted in them. If you're born to parents who idolize this type of thinking and everybody around them do also chances are youre gonna be just like them. These people get help from us and they never get why we're always tryin' to get shit done quiccly. For them..there is always time. To us...everybody is runnin' out if time. In order for this to change you need to change their entire fuccin mindset and I believe that shit is possible. The answer to this is education and if education was accessible to every fuccin child in Africa you is gonna see some fuccin changes. I guarantee you homie. This would also take care of the biggest problem of all...the population problem. An average woman is givin birth to six to seven fuccin kids over there and why?. 1) religion...they dont believe in birth control, 2) its a sign of manhood to have a lot of kids, 3) a woman with many kids gets more respect and 4) more kids means more work. This is tradition. Same thing with the fuccin taliban muthafuccas and a lot of muslim muthafuccas..they think technology is somehow evil. Women shouldnt be allowed to read a fuccin book..get the fucc outta here cuzz. And then we got the Amish and these are all white muthafuccas. Lacc of intelligence?. Im sorry cuzz I need more than that. The people in Africa need to read a fuccin book and we need money to publish books. Even if these muthafuccas don't understand time I believe time will be there only friend. More Oprahs, more schools and chances are the young generations will embrace a different type of thinkin'.

And as far as the Crips and bloods go may seem moronic to you but to a muthafucca whos had his own brother shot dead infront of his eyes and knows the cops aint gonna do a fuccin thing about it --its a whole different chess game. Yes it is a cycle. It's a cycle of violence and that cycle aint gonna stop even if you want it to stop. I believe it can be stopped but right now the problem is too deep.

I agree. Its not a race thing, its a situational thing.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: LAXCENTRAL on July 12, 2009, 04:00:46 PM
I DONO IF I AGREE WITH THAT ^
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Fathom on July 13, 2009, 08:54:43 PM
What about Latinos and Asians? Where do they rank on your scale?

I don't have a scale. But I can tell you that studies have shown Latinos are more intelligent than blacks, whites are more intelligent than Latinos, and Asians are more intelligent than the other three. But I figured this was common sense?

A statment like this just pisses me off. 
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on July 15, 2009, 08:46:07 PM
asians mos def are smart, but maybe the other races act dumb and make asians look smarter lol




What about Latinos and Asians? Where do they rank on your scale?

I don't have a scale. But I can tell you that studies have shown Latinos are more intelligent than blacks, whites are more intelligent than Latinos, and Asians are more intelligent than the other three. But I figured this was common sense?

A statment like this just pisses me off. 
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent
Post by: ikke on July 16, 2009, 04:49:07 AM
there is no ethic group more inteligent then the other.
But think about it there are way more asians then other people, so more smart ones and we only hear about them.
Title: Re: Contrary to what revisionist historians have claimed, blacks did not invent much
Post by: Triple OG Rapsodie on July 16, 2009, 08:48:47 AM
this topic is stupid. There's no difference in intelligent between races, we are the same fucking species. Any difference is cultural. Race itself is a cultural term, not a scientific one.