West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: King Tech Quadafi on May 08, 2002, 02:32:11 AM
-
why criticize Libya and Syria for seeking to develop a primitive biological/chemical program when Israel has en estimated 200 nuclear capable war heads??????????????????????????????????
-
maybe coz trying to get rid of israels is like trying to 'lock the stable doors after the horses have bolted'. but they can 'lock all the other stables' to make things better in future.
-
why criticize Libya and Syria for seeking to develop a primitive biological/chemical program when Israel has en estimated 200 nuclear capable war heads??????????????????????????????????
well....i just love this comparison....Israel is not a fanatic...terrorism supportin(hizbala etc, in seria"z case)... Israel is a democratical country that is workin on tha same principles as USA for example.....so if you ask this question you might as well want to compare
USA to seria....or any other liberal state.
-
again you are making the connection between terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, a totally baseless comparison, and the same one those right wing bigots are tryin to make to justify attacking Iraq
-
again you are making the connection between terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, a totally baseless comparison, and the same one those right wing bigots are tryin to make to justify attacking Iraq
-
again you are making the connection between terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, a totally baseless comparison, and the same one those right wing bigots are tryin to make to justify attacking Iraq
-
what i"m sayin is basiclly that if you"z talkin bout stopin" tha use of nuclear weapon it should be global not directed towards paticular states(tha only practical way to stop tha use of this weapon)...so basiclly i"m not tha one who makes tha conection you MADE IT...but subliminally.
and if we talkin bout SYRIA in paticular....i haven"t said anythang that shouldn"t worry tha world in case premiting it in SYRIA is going to be considered. it conects by itself man...just look at it objectivlly.
*this edit is dedicated to my man Owen...since he can"t understand what i"m saying*
-
Possibly if that had been spelt properly and with correct punctuation, I may have understand. I mean, do you understand this:
man, i''m tinkin you''z sayyen...tha use of puncyuashun iz...like a weapan...
Now, that's quite simple. I mean, whenever you write "SERIA", I first think you've just fucked up "serious", then I realize you mean Syria. Spell and punctuate correctly rather than in ignorant lazy ebonics (nothing against ebonics-loads of people here use them and make sense), and your argument gains respect even if it's stupid. It shows you've taken time to say it.
Or perhaps no-one understood it here because it's bollocks. More likely.
-
Possibly if that had been spelt properly and with correct punctuation, I may have understand. I mean, do you understand this:
man, i''m tinkin you''z sayyen...tha use of puncyuashun iz...like a weapan...
Now, that's quite simple. I mean, whenever you write "SERIA", I first think you've just fucked up "serious", then I realize you mean Syria. Spell and punctuate correctly rather than in ignorant lazy ebonics (nothing against ebonics-loads of people here use them and make sense), and your argument gains respect even if it's stupid. It shows you've taken time to say it.
Or perhaps no-one understood it here because it's bollocks. More likely.
ok....this was on topic...
i get it lol...it ain"t against ebonics it"z against ME...right?....
still mad bout that other thread right?...couldnt get your point across?-WELL....sorry man...GROW UP and HANDLE IT.
btw...do you really think my arguements get respect cause people don"t understand what i"m saying?-...well...this is an insult towards tha intelegence of too many people here man....not even talking bout myself right now.
-
i aint gonna get involved in this lil spat between Owen and Geezy, but Geezy, no offence man, but I purposely avoided replying to your last post cuz i didnt understand what the fuck you were sayin, sorry homie ;)
-
lol...you didn"t understand what the fuck i was saying, really? hmm....-yea OK...lol...dat"s why you haven"t replyed than, I guess..... :D *sarcastic*
OWEN"s remark is like a god gift to you homie...now you can avoid replying to my posts saying you don"t get what I was saying....lollol
-
LMAO@owen
-{bLaDe}
-
cmon homie, you know your argument is wrong. America has been turning a blind eye to Israel's nuclear program for decades,
-
i think the reason why us, the United States , are doing this is becuase we don't have to worry about israel bombing us at all,but you could say we could worry about the latter
it's a selfish reason , but in a way a smart one, BUT i don't think any countries should have nukes except britain and the US
-
cmon man, the two imperial states deserve nukes??
if u wanna ban nukes, which i believe should happen, u should ban it all the way
and cmon do you really believe any nation will attack US with nukes??? im just sayin its so hypocritical that the US criticizes
Iraq, Libya, Syria, Pakistan etc when they havent said ANYTHING about Israel's program which is more advanced that all of the aforementioned countries programs
plus, they criticize Cuba for helping Iran and Iraq when Israel is helping India develop nations
-
cmon man, the two imperial states deserve nukes??
if u wanna ban nukes, which i believe should happen, u should ban it all the way
and cmon do you really believe any nation will attack US with nukes??? im just sayin its so hypocritical that the US criticizes
Iraq, Libya, Syria, Pakistan etc when they havent said ANYTHING about Israel's program which is more advanced that all of the aforementioned countries programs
plus, they criticize Cuba for helping Iran and Iraq when Israel is helping India develop nations
yeah word, if its like that then not even the US or UK should have nukes and specially not israel, they wont hesitate to bust, lol. and they always make dumb decisions, well for the most part,and Cuba helpin Iran? LOL, Cuba is such a poverty stricken country they have nothing to offer to Iran.
-
Iranians, always begging..... ;D
-
why shouldn't the 2 most powerful states have nukes, we can be trusted with them
i don't think israel should have them or any other nation weaker but to protect the world i think the 2 most powerful nations should have them
just like i think that the only people who SHOULD have guns in the US is the law enforcement
"to beat the enemy you must be able to out arm them"
good example ...the bank robbers in LA with all them protective suits and automatic guns back in 96' , ya dig
-
yeah word, if its like that then not even the US or UK should have nukes and specially not israel, they wont hesitate to bust, lol. and they always make dumb decisions, well for the most part,and Cuba helpin Iran? LOL, Cuba is such a poverty stricken country they have nothing to offer to Iran.
the reason why cuba is so poverty stricken is becuase it's a communist country, which means everyone has a job working under the government which means most of the money goes back into the government
-
the reason why cuba is so poverty stricken is becuase it's a communist country, which means everyone has a job working under the government which means most of the money goes back into the government
your countries useless sanctions against that country dont help either lol
but cmon man, i dont trust US with being the only nation with nukes that way yall will bully the world the way yall doing now, nah man, their cant be a monopoly like that, there just cant be
-
i think once cuba becomes a democracy they won't have to worry about that no more
i said the us AND britain, not just the us
-
how can u justify those sanctions against Cuba??? they are absolutely no threat to US,
see the thing is American politicians will forever see Castro's Cuba as a symbol of American inefficiency, the fact that a commie state was allowed to thrive and survive right under their noses, so they will always be hostile to em,
-
the fact that there was a nuke 80 miles away from the US doesn't help cuba much either
i never justified the sanctons, i just said if cuba was a democracy they wouldn't have to worry about all the shit coming their way, same with china too, watch i seriously wouldn't be suprised if there was a big ass revolution in cuba within the next 10 years that made that country a democracy
-
oh dont get me wrong, during the missle crisis, i felt the americans were justified to do whatever the fuck they wanted to do, but now?? its like, a lost cause, Cuba aint shit to yall
as for Cuban revolution, i can see it happening,
but i see a revolution in Saudi Arabia and Iran happening earlier
-
communism is a threat to democracy therfore a threat to us, which means you as well, afterall your government was modled after ours. if we had a beef with the people rather than the government id see why you'd be against the US here but we're against their government, and in communism the government and the people are 2 different things unlike a democracy like you and i are use to
and no doubt about there being several revolutions in the mid east
-
i agree with the above, i just see the sanctions now, as very useless, im not doubting their use in the past during the cold war
-
i agree that they're a little strict over there with the sanctions , but i dunno i guess the government feels that if they loosen up (especially now) ..nother cold war'esque thing. We just need a democratic nation there and everything would be all gravy , remember Castro is doing more harm to his people with his fucking dictatorship then with those US sanctions
-
i dont see another revolution happening in iran anytime soon, iran just had one in 79, and cuba will probably go though a lot of change after castro dies.....
-
Jake, you're wrong about Castro there, my dear boy. Castro is actually, surprisingly enough to all you CNN-fed people, benevolent. Figures for disappearances are at, I think, 73, all during the time our "hero" Che "Kill The Children" Guevarra was alive...By the way, fuck Senor Guevarra.
The US government last year estimated their GDP per capita was just 4% below that of the Americans, though their overall GP was around 35%; showing the impact of the sanctions. Domestically, they are almost as rich as the US, but in terms of exports and government resources, they have virtually nil due to the sanctions. By the way, Cuba is a socialist country, which has held elections for Parliament every year since 1960. The Senate is elected every four years. The presidency has always been for life...And I'd rather live under Castro than his predecessor, Mister "I'm An American Funded Insane Dictator".
-
Oh, on two other points.
Geezy, your post made no sense, not because of your argument-which, if anyone understood, was probably interesting, as it usually is-but about your lazy ebonics.
And on nobody but the US having nukes...Isn't that against the principles of your beloved capitalist society? It damages free trade...Hmm...I smell a hypocrite somewhere in the house, capitalist one at that...Nothin against Jake, but many other goods are traded freely around the world more than nukes, and by these goods I mean ones that kill far more people than nukes have. I'd prefer Iran having nukes, if only to stop the US thinking it had a monopoly.
I mean, during the Cold War, if the USSR had never had any nukes, and had refused to become a capitalist society, the US would have nuked them. Is that desirable? Shall we kill off 400 million people because they were supplicant to the US demands of disarmanent, without asking anything back?
-
^^
word
mother fucking word!!!