West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: -VZA- on July 06, 2004, 02:46:56 PM
-
Whether you love him or hate him, you gotta give him props. I'm not even for the war and I'm not even going to vote for him in this upcoming election but you have to respect a man who does what he believes. The man took a whole lot of criticism for his actions but he still had the balls to do the "right" thing. There aren't many people who can claim that. So give him some respect.
-
?
-
wow, what great reasoning. why don't you become head of Bush's election council. with someone like you he's guaranteed victory.
-
weird post to be honest. how is it great to do fucked up things "although" everyone knows how fucked up they are ???
it's like you give me props cause I keep punchin a cat, although ppl say I should stop because I believe in what Im doing. You'd give me my props?
-
?
-
weird post to be honest. how is it great to do fucked up things "although" everyone knows how fucked up they are ???
it's like you give me props cause I keep punchin a cat, although ppl say I should stop because I believe in what Im doing. You'd give me my props?
only if iu kept on hitting the cat and then got everyone to join in.
-
Im going to invade all of the eastern hemisphere, and slaughter any person in my path.
but at least i believe in it ::)
-
I know of alot of people who justify Bush's actions because of that which I find very disturbing. If you agree with the moves he has made as president, then more power to you, that can be respected. If you like him because you think he does things for himself and not for the country, then I hope you don't vote.
-
weird post to be honest. how is it great to do fucked up things "although" everyone knows how fucked up they are ???
it's like you give me props cause I keep punchin a cat, although ppl say I should stop because I believe in what Im doing. You'd give me my props?
only if iu kept on hitting the cat and then got everyone to join in.
well then I guess noone deserves more props than Hitler
-
thats not an accurate analogy to me.
to me its like this...
a guy (saddam) was beating up his cat in his own home, keeping it locked up, and barely feeding it
now most people suspected this... but instead of waiting for the poliice and animal rights people to do their thing (UN)
you (bush) charge in with ya homies (blair etc), rescue the cat and kick the guys ass
the aftermath...
the cat is still conditioned to hate the people in authority and will fight (you heard of abused cats that go nuts/feral right?). in reality they didn't have the freedom as they were caged (by the fear of gassing n stuff) to rebel in the past whereas now they do.
IMO multiply the number of cats and you've got iraq
the net result is.. if they'd bloody waited it might well have happened through the UN anyways.. but they had to 'prove' the abuse and get it acted upon instead of being vigiliantes.
ya'll wit me?
-
We SHOULD HAVE NEVER invaded IRAQ!
THAT IS THE Issue!
-
Whether you love him or hate him, you gotta give him props. I'm not even for the war and I'm not even going to vote for him in this upcoming election but you have to respect a man who does what he believes. The man took a whole lot of criticism for his actions but he still had the balls to do the "right" thing. There aren't many people who can claim that. So give him some respect.
This is a pretty arrogant post. You have to respect a man who does what he believes. Hitler believed he was doing "the 'right' thing" by killing Jews because he believed the Aryan race should rule, should be given props? Everyone has a different opinion on what the "right" thing is, so no one is obligated to give him respect. If I believed it was "right" to kill random innocent people for whatever reason, should I be given props for having the balls to go out and do it?
-
Alright so I wasn't so clear with the point I was trying to make. I think if a man feels he should do something and thinks that he is making a good move then he should be given props. That way you wouldn't be giving Hitler any props because despite what anybody else says, I can't believe that he honestly felt it was right to commit genocide. Same goes for those of you with your insane ideas about killing random people or invading a whole continent. I don't care how far you are off your rocker, you just can't believe that's the right thing to do.
Yeah, I'm sure there are a lot of people in Iraq who didn't want their country invaded. You have to think about the people who had those weapons of mass destruction used on them. There was this one guy who said "You Americans are all the same, you all want to see the weapons of mass destruction. I'll show you something even better, I'll take you to the graves where my mother, uncles, aunts, nephews, and nieces were buried." He then opened up his shirt and revealed a huge scar on his chest. Then he said "Bush is going to enter heaven with his finest clothes on." From some points of view I can see how Bush leading an attack on Iraq is wrong but you have to consider the people who have suffered from Sadam's dictatorship.
-
You have no idea what psychotic people believe what is right or wrong. What if someone is brought up a certain way from birth? That is all the knowledge they have to make judgments off of. Some people just have no sense of morals, no sense of right or wrong. Some people have no conscience to guide them.
Anyways, yeah I understand your point about Bush and Iraq, but yes you really worded things badly. Also, you're assuming Bush thought it was the right thing to save those who have suffered from Saddam's dictatorship, rather than for some other not-so-righteous reasons that may benefit America. No one really knows for sure what his motives were.
-
I hope nobody thinks Bushs motive was a better life for the Iraqi population
-
I hope nobody thinks Bushs motive was a better life for the Iraqi population
Bush isn't the most intelligent man... thats all i got to say
-
That way you wouldn't be giving Hitler any props because despite what anybody else says, I can't believe that he honestly felt it was right to commit genocide.
I think you are wrong there.
-
I got to give your mom props for the head she gave me last week.
Cum everywhere
-
I got to give your mom props for the head she gave me last week.
Cum everywhere
LoL, wtf.
-
thats not an accurate analogy to me.
to me its like this...
a guy (saddam) was beating up his cat in his own home, keeping it locked up, and barely feeding it
now most people suspected this... but instead of waiting for the poliice and animal rights people to do their thing (UN)
you (bush) charge in with ya homies (blair etc), rescue the cat and kick the guys ass
the aftermath...
the cat is still conditioned to hate the people in authority and will fight (you heard of abused cats that go nuts/feral right?). in reality they didn't have the freedom as they were caged (by the fear of gassing n stuff) to rebel in the past whereas now they do.
IMO multiply the number of cats and you've got iraq
the net result is.. if they'd bloody waited it might well have happened through the UN anyways.. but they had to 'prove' the abuse and get it acted upon instead of being vigiliantes.
ya'll wit me?
I dont think its that simple man. First of all, Saddam kept his people well fed until the sanctions hit. Also, the vigilantes rushing the house analogy doesnt work either. Because u have to include the funding these vigilantes gave the cat owner in administrating abuse, the real estate value of the cat abusers house, the extent of a relationship between said cat abuser and vigilantes, and finally the Jewish neighbour across the street who feels discomfortable in the presence of this cat abuse, but is meanwhile slaughtering them by the dozens in his basement,
-
its funny how most americans are against the war
afcourse its for the oil, but also for those fuckin terrorist
They should all be killed, otherwise yall have much more day like 9/11
they should kill those fagots in Suran (somethying like that) in afrika too
-
its funny how most americans are against the war
afcourse its for the oil, but also for those fuckin terrorist
They should all be killed, otherwise yall have much more day like 9/11
they should kill those fagots in Suran (somethying like that) in afrika too
lmao, what's the point in bringin an old, retarded topic back with a retarded ass response ??? how's that helping?
-
He thinks every terrorist doesn't deserve to live. I don't see what's wrong with that thought.
-
He thinks every terrorist doesn't deserve to live. I don't see what's wrong with that thought.
word
that's what Im talknig about
-
thats not an accurate analogy to me.
to me its like this...
a guy (saddam) was beating up his cat in his own home, keeping it locked up, and barely feeding it
now most people suspected this... but instead of waiting for the poliice and animal rights people to do their thing (UN)
you (bush) charge in with ya homies (blair etc), rescue the cat and kick the guys ass
the aftermath...
the cat is still conditioned to hate the people in authority and will fight (you heard of abused cats that go nuts/feral right?). in reality they didn't have the freedom as they were caged (by the fear of gassing n stuff) to rebel in the past whereas now they do.
IMO multiply the number of cats and you've got iraq
the net result is.. if they'd bloody waited it might well have happened through the UN anyways.. but they had to 'prove' the abuse and get it acted upon instead of being vigiliantes.
ya'll wit me?
I am.