Author Topic: U.S. caught playing up role of Zarqawi in Iraq to promote their war propaganda  (Read 266 times)

Infinite Trapped in 1996

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10945
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Karma: -1128
  • Permenent Resident of 1996 Pre-Sept. 13th
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12243324/

This article is from MSNBC's website.  MSNBC is part of the problem so you can't believe what you hear from them, they are owned by war contractors.  Still, they are forced to release this story, although they may have mitigated it's impact.



********************************************



U.S. military plays up role of Zarqawi
Jordanian painted as foreign threat to Iraq’s stability


Updated: 6:39 a.m. ET April 10, 2006
The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program. The effort has raised his profile in a way that some military intelligence officials believe may have overstated his importance and helped the Bush administration tie the war to the organization responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The documents state that the U.S. campaign aims to turn Iraqis against Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian, by playing on their perceived dislike of foreigners. U.S. authorities claim some success with that effort, noting that some tribal Iraqi insurgents have attacked Zarqawi loyalists.

 
• More Iraq news
 
For the past two years, U.S. military leaders have been using Iraqi media and other outlets in Baghdad to publicize Zarqawi's role in the insurgency. The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.

Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some senior intelligence officers believe Zarqawi's role may have been overemphasized by the propaganda campaign, which has included leaflets, radio and television broadcasts, Internet postings and at least one leak to an American journalist. Although Zarqawi and other foreign insurgents in Iraq have conducted deadly bombing attacks, they remain "a very small part of the actual numbers," Col. Derek Harvey, who served as a military intelligence officer in Iraq and then was one of the top officers handling Iraq intelligence issues on the staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told an Army meeting at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., last summer.

In a transcript of the meeting, Harvey said, "Our own focus on Zarqawi has enlarged his caricature, if you will -- made him more important than he really is, in some ways."

"The long-term threat is not Zarqawi or religious extremists, but these former regime types and their friends," said Harvey, who did not return phone calls seeking comment on his remarks.

Running argument
There has been a running argument among specialists in Iraq about how much significance to assign to Zarqawi, who spent seven years in prison in Jordan for attempting to overthrow the government there. After his release he spent time in Pakistan and Afghanistan before moving his base of operations to Iraq. He has been sentenced to death in absentia for planning the 2002 assassination of U.S. diplomat Lawrence Foley in Jordan. U.S. authorities have said he is responsible for dozens of deaths in Iraq and have placed a $25 million bounty on his head.

Recently there have been unconfirmed reports of a possible rift between Zarqawi and the parent al-Qaeda organization that may have resulted in his being demoted or cut loose. Last week, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said that it was unclear what was happening between Zarqawi and al-Qaeda. "It may be that he's not being fired at all, but that he is being focused on the military side of the al-Qaeda effort and he's being asked to leave more of a political side possibly to others, because of some disagreements within al-Qaeda," he said.

The military's propaganda program largely has been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of the war.

That slide, created by Casey's subordinates, does not specifically state that U.S. citizens were being targeted by the effort, but other sections of the briefings indicate that there were direct military efforts to use the U.S. media to affect views of the war. One slide in the same briefing, for example, noted that a "selective leak" about Zarqawi was made to Dexter Filkins, a New York Times reporter based in Baghdad. Filkins's resulting article, about a letter supposedly written by Zarqawi and boasting of suicide attacks in Iraq, ran on the Times front page on Feb. 9, 2004.

Leaks to reporters from U.S. officials in Iraq are common, but official evidence of a propaganda operation using an American reporter is rare.

Filkins, reached by e-mail, said that he was not told at the time that there was a psychological operations campaign aimed at Zarqawi, but said he assumed that the military was releasing the letter "because it had decided it was in its best interest to have it publicized." No special conditions were placed upon him in being briefed on its contents, he said. He said he was skeptical about the document's authenticity then, and remains so now, and so at the time tried to confirm its authenticity with officials outside the U.S. military.

‘No attempt to manipulate the press’
"There was no attempt to manipulate the press," Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, the U.S. military's chief spokesman when the propaganda campaign began in 2004, said in an interview Friday. "We trusted Dexter to write an accurate story, and we gave him a good scoop."

Another briefing slide states that after U.S. commanders ordered that the atrocities of Saddam Hussein's government be publicized, U.S. psychological operations soldiers produced a video disc that not only was widely disseminated inside Iraq, but also was "seen on Fox News."

U.S. military policy is not to aim psychological operations at Americans, said Army Col. James A. Treadwell, who commanded the U.S. military psyops unit in Iraq in 2003. "It is ingrained in U.S.: You don't psyop Americans. We just don't do it," said Treadwell. He said he left Iraq before the Zarqawi program began but was later told about it.

"When we provided stuff, it was all in Arabic," and aimed at the Iraqi and Arab media, said another military officer familiar with the program, who spoke on background because he is not supposed to speak to reporters.

But this officer said that the Zarqawi campaign "probably raised his profile in the American press's view."

With satellite television, e-mail and the Internet, it is impossible to prevent some carryover from propaganda campaigns overseas into the U.S. media, said Treadwell, who is now director of a new project at the U.S. Special Operations Command that focuses on "trans-regional" media issues. Such carryover is "not blowback, it's bleed-over," he said. "There's always going to be a certain amount of bleed-over with the global information environment."

The Zarqawi program was not related to another effort, led by the Lincoln Group, a U.S. consulting firm, to place pro-U.S. articles in Iraq newspapers, according to the officer familiar with the program who spoke on background.

It is difficult to determine how much has been spent on the Zarqawi campaign, which began two years ago and is believed to be ongoing. U.S. propaganda efforts in Iraq in 2004 cost $24 million, but that included extensive building of offices and residences for troops involved, as well as radio broadcasts and distribution of thousands of leaflets with Zarqawi's face on them, said the officer speaking on background.

Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

‘Villainize Zarqawi’
The Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops (626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S. military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S. military term for propaganda work.

One internal briefing, produced by the U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, said that Kimmitt had concluded that, "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date.

Kimmitt is now the senior planner on the staff of the Central Command that directs operations in Iraq and the rest of the Middle East. In 2003 and 2004, he coordinated public affairs, information operations and psychological operations in Iraq -- though he said in an interview the internal briefing must be mistaken because he did not actually run the psychological operations and could not speak for them.

Kimmitt said, "There was clearly an information campaign to raise the public awareness of who Zarqawi was, primarily for the Iraqi audience but also with the international audience."

A goal of the campaign was to drive a wedge into the insurgency by emphasizing Zarqawi's terrorist acts and foreign origin, said officers familiar with the program. "Through aggressive Strategic Communications, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi now represents: Terrorism in Iraq/Foreign Fighters in Iraq/Suffering of Iraqi People (Infrastructure Attacks)/Denial of Iraqi Aspirations," the same briefing asserts.

Officials said one indication that the campaign worked is that over the past several months, there have been reports that Iraqi tribal insurgents have attacked Zarqawi loyalists, especially in the culturally conservative province of Anbar. "What we're finding is indeed the people of al-Anbar -- Fallujah and Ramadi, specifically -- have decided to turn against terrorists and foreign fighters," Maj. Gen Rick Lynch, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, said in February.

*******

"I will make records as big or bigger than Death Row".   -Dre, Source 1996

"I didn't do nothing but make people money and I didn't leave nobody high and dry.  Any album (on death row) people are going to check for.  But it's time for Dre to worry about Dre.  I'm focused on the new Snoop Doggs, not like that but you know what I mean."

Dre -  Source 1996 cover

"Eminem will be bigger than Michael Jackson as long as he doesn't change."

-Dre, Rolling Stones mag 1999 Em cover

********
 

Don Rizzle

  • Capo Di Tutti Capi
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: -4
I can't believe america being involved in properganda is even news worthy, it kinda goes without saying

iraq would just get annexed by iran


That would be a great solution.  If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
 

Jip

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1472
  • Karma: -36
same shit different day

you must get bored of posting this stuff
 

Infinite Trapped in 1996

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10945
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Karma: -1128
  • Permenent Resident of 1996 Pre-Sept. 13th


Why do so many at this forum still believe everything you read in the media then?
*******

"I will make records as big or bigger than Death Row".   -Dre, Source 1996

"I didn't do nothing but make people money and I didn't leave nobody high and dry.  Any album (on death row) people are going to check for.  But it's time for Dre to worry about Dre.  I'm focused on the new Snoop Doggs, not like that but you know what I mean."

Dre -  Source 1996 cover

"Eminem will be bigger than Michael Jackson as long as he doesn't change."

-Dre, Rolling Stones mag 1999 Em cover

********
 

Jip

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1472
  • Karma: -36
i havent read through it, there probably is proerganda, only posting on this forum about it isnt going to do anything

tell someone who cares
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
i havent read through it, there probably is proerganda, only posting on this forum about it isnt going to do anything

tell someone who cares


This is the TOT Forum and that article deserves some discussion.  Probably is propaganda?  You don't need to read the entire story all you have to do is read the title
 

Jip

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1472
  • Karma: -36
i read the title, but i can guess from the other threads that people are tired of discussing this war thing

i know i am
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
People are tired of seeing family members and their friends die in this war. 
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 02:40:47 PM by Javy »
 

Don Rizzle

  • Capo Di Tutti Capi
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: -4
i read the title, but i can guess from the other threads that people are tired of discussing this war thing

i know i am
yup i agree the time of talking about the rights n wrongs of the war has gone ages ago. accept the new reality and get on with it. A pull out now would be dissasterous for all parties and wouldn't achieve anything.

iraq would just get annexed by iran


That would be a great solution.  If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
It's not about discussing the rights and wrongs anymore.   We know it was wrong in the first place and were led to believing it was right.  Look at the Scooter Libby case right now, they're not gonna stop his trial because it was in the past that would be some god damn bullshit.   The trooops being there is part of the problem.  They're gonna have to pull them out eventually and I don't want to see troops there for fucking decades being the world god damn police. 
 

Don Rizzle

  • Capo Di Tutti Capi
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: -4
I don't want to see them there indefinatly, but to leave now would be plain stupid.

troops being there are part of the problem but they are also part of the solution, for our troops to be able to leave there needs to be a governement, institutions, police and an army which can hold the country together on its own, this criteria has not been met yet. If we leave before then fight for power will intensify and there will be full scale civil war which would be very likely spill over into neighbouring countries. Things may look bad now, but i garentee they will be fuck load worse if we were to leave now. People need to be discussing how to improve the current situation, which a large scale pull out certainly would not achieve.

with reference to scooter libby, yea they are not gonna stop his trial and rightly so, but this different we are talking about what happening RIGHT NOW, if the invasion was illegal or not it makes absolutely no difference to the presence now, which has a clear mandate. If there are grounds to prosecute the leaders who took us to war that should be handled by the courts, but it shouldn't be linked to the question of whether we should stay it out or not. thats would just be bad judgement.

iraq would just get annexed by iran


That would be a great solution.  If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
It's pretty obvious that no one wants to see them leave there ASAP but it's still fucking tiring seeing people die every day for some bullshit and these same leaders are getting preperaed for another war.  Like if it would make any sense for Iran to use their potential nuclear weapons on the U.S or even sell it to extremists...they would know the end result if that decisision were to be made. 
 

Infinite Trapped in 1996

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10945
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Karma: -1128
  • Permenent Resident of 1996 Pre-Sept. 13th
It's pretty obvious that no one wants to see them leave there ASAP

I want to see them leave immediately

You guys still don't understand how the media has manipulated you.  You have to learn to read between the lines and see the big picture.  The US had a stategic plan when they entered Iraq, and it wasn't just about Weapons of Mass Destruction. 

The US is not trying to prevent a civil war in Iraq but rather they are trying to create a civil war in Iraq.  The US is not trying to set up the conditions for their departure from Iraq but rather they are trying to create conditions that would justify a long-term occupation of Iraq. 

Open your eyes.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2006, 11:03:38 AM by Islamic Khalifah Sultan Abdul Hamid- 1908- »
*******

"I will make records as big or bigger than Death Row".   -Dre, Source 1996

"I didn't do nothing but make people money and I didn't leave nobody high and dry.  Any album (on death row) people are going to check for.  But it's time for Dre to worry about Dre.  I'm focused on the new Snoop Doggs, not like that but you know what I mean."

Dre -  Source 1996 cover

"Eminem will be bigger than Michael Jackson as long as he doesn't change."

-Dre, Rolling Stones mag 1999 Em cover

********
 

Jip

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1472
  • Karma: -36
It's pretty obvious that no one wants to see them leave there ASAP

I want to see them leave immediately

You guys still don't understand how the media has manipulated you.  You have to learn to read between the lines and see the big picture.  The US had a stategic plan when they entered Iraq, and it wasn't just about Weapons of Mass Destruction. 

The US is not trying to prevent a civil war in Iraq but rather they are trying to create a civil war in Iraq.  The US is not trying to set up the conditions for their departure from Iraq but rather they are trying to create conditions that would justify a long-term occupation of Iraq. 

Open your eyes.

we know

its quite obvious

but theres nothing i can do, you either