Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/11 Attack

[King Tech Quadafi]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/210406runattack.htm

Former Helmut Schmidt cabinet member, 25-year German Parliamentarian and global intelligence expert Andreas Von Bülow says that the 9/11 attack was run by the highest levels of the US intelligence apparatus using WTC Building 7 as a command bunker which was later demolished in order to destroy the crime scene.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, Von Bülow said that "the official story is so wrong, it must be an inside job."

Von Bülow discussed the special software programs that allow the CIA to track suspicious stock market movements in real time. Record put options placed on United and American Airlines in the week before 9/11, a speculation that the stock would crash, clearly indicated inside foreknowledge of the impending attack.

"If the stock market has very strange movements immediately they take care of this and they had a lot of tapes and the lawyers told the people destroy these tapes."

"The Bush administration is in a deep defensive [mode] and probably they would like to come out with a new offensive," said Von Bülow as he considered whether a new staged false flag terror attack could be launched to further an interventionist agenda.

"I would hope that one 'new Pearl Harbor' is enough," said Von Bülow, "but I cannot be sure."



Von Bülow commented on the disputed identities of the named hijackers.

"The names of these nineteen [hijackers] never came up in the official passenger list, until now there's no proof they were on the planes."

Von Bülow also pointed out how the alleged hijacker's flight instructors told investigators that they couldn't even fly Cessna's, never mind complex large commercial airliners.

Von Bülow also touched upon the implausible collapse of the buildings.

"The towers came down in the velocity of free fall which is totally impossible, they fall down in 8, 9, or 10 seconds, the pancake theory is ridiculous," he said.

Von Bülow also highlighted the fact that there were 67 successful intercepts of errant aircraft in the year of 2001 before 9/11 and yet four planes were allowed to veer wildly off course without any being intercepted on that one day.

Rudolph Giuliani opened a $13 million emergency Command Center (pictured) on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center Building 7 in June 1999 in part to respond to and manage terrorist attacks.



Von Bülow referenced the command bunker in Building 7, calling it the "optimal place" to run the attacks using remote control technology to guide the planes in and then destroying the crime scene by imploding the building.

"There were two procedures, one was flying in the aircraft the second was the explosions," he said.

When asked precisely which parties carried out the attack Von Bülow said it must have been a "very small group" within the CIA with the help of Saudi Arabian and Pakistani secret service intelligence.

Von Bülow outlined his view that one reason for the execution of 9/11 was to provide the justification for US military bases in the near and Middle East to be built in anticipation for a future confrontation with China, whom the Neo-Cons believe have grown too powerful and need to have their geopolitical wings clipped.

[Diabolical]

Lol, crash a plane into a building to destroy a few thousand tapes.

Crazy.

No one could have predicted that the towers would have collapsed anyway.

[DreSnoop00]

Interesting...
the only thing thats crazy and this is looking at it from a physics point of view, like the article said, it fell like free fall, and I mean i know more than your average person about physics, since i'm majoring in engineering and all, but its pretty simple to understand and u dont need that background at all, it looks like the towers fell "too perfect", and when a building or structure falls in that manner, its because of an internal demolition,
based on the way the plane hit the towers it would have fell differently, hey it could just be a really rare coincidence, but who knows? thats how i see it, using physics to see how objects fall due to gravity

[Fonky Fresh]

I assume the theory explained in a book of a french journalist in 2003-2004  proving frame by frame & with official reports from the us army & cia-fbi documents & speeches continues its tour

Actually from what i heard it seems that oil  stocks have been faked in the 70's(around 78).All the oil producers have gathering up to conclude a deal on faking stocks quantity due to many reasons,one of those was because they were under pressure to discover new oil fields which cost something like severals billions of dollars . The stocks have been fakely  increased  and on the other hand no major discovery of a big oil field has surfaced,proving current oil stocks on the planet is the lowest since humans use oil as primary energy.I guess thats the main reason why U.S government took the decision to 1st fake a terrorist attack on U.S floor in 2001 & then taking control of the latest oil stocks in Irak with a war to legitimate their action.

All that is linked & now being proved by severals serious seeks from various journalists around the world & it appears obvious Bush's government is about to face a major crisis sooner or later...if not already done.

[nibs]

Lol, crash a plane into a building to destroy a few thousand tapes.

Crazy.

No one could have predicted that the towers would have collapsed anyway.

building 7 was not hit by a plane.  towers 1 & 2 were hit by planes.  building 7 was a building in the wtc complex that collapsed later on, possibly by explosives.  this guy is suggesting the tapes were in buildings 7.

it's been suggested that towers 1 and 2 also were brought down by explosives.

[dexter]

Lol, crash a plane into a building to destroy a few thousand tapes.

Crazy.

No one could have predicted that the towers would have collapsed anyway.

building 7 was not hit by a plane.  towers 1 & 2 were hit by planes.  building 7 was a building in the wtc complex that collapsed later on, possibly by explosives.  this guy is suggesting the tapes were in buildings 7.

it's been suggested that towers 1 and 2 also were brought down by explosives.

OH BOY!

[Trauma-san]

I agree something looks fishy about the way the building fell.  I mean, millions and millions of pounds of steel wouldn't fall STRAIGHT DOWN IN THE QUICKEST POSSIBLE ROUTE TO THE GROUND.  I imagine that in reality (and keep in mind, I'm no physics expert) but I imagine that if the building REALLY FELL DOWn (which I don't believe it did) if the building REALLY FELL DOWN, it would have simply toppled over kind of like when you knock a beer bottle over.  It would have been the same thing.  Since a story is 10 feet, and the buildings were at least 100 stories high, this means that the top of the building would have had to travel 1000 feet (or a fifth of a mile) across manhattan.  I (and keep in mind, I don't know anything about physics) believe this is of course possible, and if a 10 ton plane hit the 50,000 ton building, the building would fall over and the top million pounds or so of the buiilding would move 1000 feet across the new york skyline instead of just falling straight down.  So since the building didn't fall over and instead fell straight down in the quickest possible way for the millions and millions of pounds to get to the ground, they must have faked it, and the building never fell over.  Since they faked it, I think what actually happened was this was a clever illusion involving david copperfield and the jumbo-tron in times square.  Remember when he made the statue of liberty dissapear? Huh? Huh? 

[King Tech Quadafi]

I agree something looks fishy about the way the building fell.  I mean, millions and millions of pounds of steel wouldn't fall STRAIGHT DOWN IN THE QUICKEST POSSIBLE ROUTE TO THE GROUND.  I imagine that in reality (and keep in mind, I'm no physics expert) but I imagine that if the building REALLY FELL DOWn (which I don't believe it did) if the building REALLY FELL DOWN, it would have simply toppled over kind of like when you knock a beer bottle over.  It would have been the same thing.  Since a story is 10 feet, and the buildings were at least 100 stories high, this means that the top of the building would have had to travel 1000 feet (or a fifth of a mile) across manhattan.  I (and keep in mind, I don't know anything about physics) believe this is of course possible, and if a 10 ton plane hit the 50,000 ton building, the building would fall over and the top million pounds or so of the buiilding would move 1000 feet across the new york skyline instead of just falling straight down.  So since the building didn't fall over and instead fell straight down in the quickest possible way for the millions and millions of pounds to get to the ground, they must have faked it, and the building never fell over.  Since they faked it, I think what actually happened was this was a clever illusion involving david copperfield and the jumbo-tron in times square.  Remember when he made the statue of liberty dissapear? Huh? Huh? 

Tsk Tsk

The poor chaps finally lost it

[DreSnoop00]

interesting thread though tech, what are your thoughts about it man?

[Fonky Fresh]

my view is that u.s gorvernment is messed up front to back side to side.