Author Topic: Clinton v. Bush  (Read 384 times)

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2142
  • Karma: -418
Clinton v. Bush
« on: May 12, 2006, 09:22:06 PM »
    Poll: Clinton outperformed Bush

    Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush).

    On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

    Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.
 

coola

  • Guest
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2006, 09:23:17 PM »
well... bush DID start a war...
 

africas seed

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1076
  • Karma: 45
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2006, 09:33:37 PM »
this poll basically just stated the obvious that clinton was a better president.
 

Mo Z. Dizzle

  • Moderator
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6145
  • Karma: 877
  • Mo Z. Dizzle, the CEO of WCC Wrestling League
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2006, 09:37:19 PM »
im not sure how the US system works; is or will Clinton be allowed to run for president again>
      
The WCCWL is always looking for new members; take a chance at becoming a champ!! PM Mo Z. Dizzle if interested!!
 

africas seed

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1076
  • Karma: 45
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2006, 09:38:42 PM »
im not sure how the US system works; is or will Clinton be allowed to run for president again>

maybe hillary ;D
 

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Made
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12114
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2006, 10:07:07 PM »
im not sure how the US system works; is or will Clinton be allowed to run for president again>

no. There was no offical law until the 40's. Roosevelt, the greatest president since 1865, ran for 4 terms, and won all of them because we were at war during WWII. He broke a long tradition of only 2 terms, as most presidents retired after 2 terms because George Washington said that no man should not serve any more terms. After Roosevelt's death in 1945, they made it law that you only get 2 terms of your own. So since, say, LBJ served a term because of JFK's death, he could run for his own two terms after that. He ran for one, and in 1968 he didn't run again because he feared he'd lose because the Vietnam War. So unless Clinton is the VP, and the president is killed, he cannot be president again. This is why he didn't run in 2000, or he would have easily defeated Bush that year.

Hilary will run, I doubt she'll win, the Dems need to put there money on Obama, his a winner.
 

h cottie is bac-tive?

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1937
  • Karma: -111
  • The trains are NY veins, the city's a Psycho
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2006, 10:24:46 PM »
Hilary will run, I doubt she'll win, the Dems need to put there money on Obama, his a winner.

true story

I WENT TO STAPLES CENTER WEN I WAS WALKING MY GOLD RAG FALL OF MY POCKET AND THE GROUND WAS WET TO AND DIRTY MY RAG GOT DIRTY A LIL BIT PULL IT IT BACK AND MAKE SURE IT WOULD NOT DROP AGAIN ROCKING MY RAG AGAIN HOMIE 8
 

J Bananas

  • Guest
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2006, 01:17:34 AM »
    Poll: Clinton outperformed Bush

    Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush).

    On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

    Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.

have you ever thought about taking action as opposed to ranting? you would really convince me youre dedicated to the cause by putting a 7.62 in georgies head. cmon, cmon, cmon, cmon....
 

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2142
  • Karma: -418
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2006, 01:44:27 PM »
    Poll: Clinton outperformed Bush

    Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush).

    On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

    Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.

have you ever thought about taking action as opposed to ranting? you would really convince me youre dedicated to the cause by putting a 7.62 in georgies head. cmon, cmon, cmon, cmon....

Have you ever done anything meaningful with your life?  This is a discussion forum.  The one ranting is you.  I read a lot of news and occasionally post the politically entertaining or relevant stories here.  All I'm doing is ctrl+c.  Get over it. 
 

J Bananas

  • Guest
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2006, 02:04:31 PM »
Quote
All I'm doing is ctrl+c.

thatll come back to haunt you
 

Mo Z. Dizzle

  • Moderator
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6145
  • Karma: 877
  • Mo Z. Dizzle, the CEO of WCC Wrestling League
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2006, 02:34:39 PM »
im not sure how the US system works; is or will Clinton be allowed to run for president again>

no. There was no offical law until the 40's. Roosevelt, the greatest president since 1865, ran for 4 terms, and won all of them because we were at war during WWII. He broke a long tradition of only 2 terms, as most presidents retired after 2 terms because George Washington said that no man should not serve any more terms. After Roosevelt's death in 1945, they made it law that you only get 2 terms of your own. So since, say, LBJ served a term because of JFK's death, he could run for his own two terms after that. He ran for one, and in 1968 he didn't run again because he feared he'd lose because the Vietnam War. So unless Clinton is the VP, and the president is killed, he cannot be president again. This is why he didn't run in 2000, or he would have easily defeated Bush that year.

Hilary will run, I doubt she'll win, the Dems need to put there money on Obama, his a winner.

thanks for the info dude
      
The WCCWL is always looking for new members; take a chance at becoming a champ!! PM Mo Z. Dizzle if interested!!
 

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2142
  • Karma: -418
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2006, 04:33:44 PM »
Quote
All I'm doing is ctrl+c.

thatll come back to haunt you

How? And why are you so obsessed with me dude? It's not like I go out of my way to follow you around thru threads.
 

Trauma-san

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16639
  • Karma: -231
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2006, 10:36:17 PM »
Bush is in the middle of two wars, and about to start a third.  His vice president shoots people, Bush himself is soft on immigration although 75 percent of the country wants harder punishment, he had the largest terror attack ever on his watch, etc. 

Clinton chilled in the oval office and got his dick sucked by the fat interns down the hall. 

What am I missing here? 
 

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2142
  • Karma: -418
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2006, 05:59:04 PM »
Bush is in the middle of two wars, and about to start a third.  His vice president shoots people, Bush himself is soft on immigration although 75 percent of the country wants harder punishment, he had the largest terror attack ever on his watch, etc. 

Clinton chilled in the oval office and got his dick sucked by the fat interns down the hall. 

What am I missing here? 

HAHA.  A lot apparently.  If only the comparison of 16 years of presidential gonvernance was as simple as you made things seem.  Like I said, it's no wonder you vote Bush, your mind just doesn't function properly.
 

E. J. Rizo

  • The "Mac" Daddy
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3601
  • Karma: 193
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2006, 10:49:56 AM »
this is like a poll proving that 2pac is better than Ja Rule

too easy...

Clinton was a great president... and he probrably would still be president now if it wasnt for the 2 terms he already served....

lets get hilary in there and he can be the First First Man! like a true pimp!
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Clinton v. Bush
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2006, 11:39:56 AM »
Fuck a bitch (running the country)...