Author Topic: Why were few particular states had to be the powerplay?  (Read 70 times)

Mr. O

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Karma: 123
Why were few particular states had to be the powerplay?
« on: November 08, 2006, 05:54:21 PM »
I mean...how did tenesesee, montana, missoui and kentucky determine who controls house and senate?

I mean we got Washington, nevada...and other 44 states...  I don't get that.

Well, anyway, Bush is lonely with his only pal, Cheney.
[flash=200,200<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AlIxU8SiFZU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AlIxU8SiFZU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/flash]
 

da flayboyant 2

  • Guest
Re: Why were few particular states had to be the powerplay?
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2006, 08:50:12 PM »
not all states elected reps this time. all the seats are on a 6 year term but there are elections every 2, so only 1/3 of the states had those elections
 

Mr. O

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Karma: 123
Re: Why were few particular states had to be the powerplay?
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2006, 09:45:03 PM »
not all states elected reps this time. all the seats are on a 6 year term but there are elections every 2, so only 1/3 of the states had those elections
gotcha..i guess it makes sense. thx.
[flash=200,200<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AlIxU8SiFZU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AlIxU8SiFZU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/flash]