Andrew Bynum or Dwight Howard?...Who Will End Up The Better Big?

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

[jeromechickenbone]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

[jeromechickenbone]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

[jeromechickenbone]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

LOL@ this dumbass.  It's not the same fuckin thing.  Notice they list Darko as F-C.  Their natural position is listed first. 

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

LOL@ this dumbass.  It's not the same fuckin thing.  Notice they list Darko as F-C.  Their natural position is listed first. 

Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818

[jeromechickenbone]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

LOL@ this dumbass.  It's not the same fuckin thing.  Notice they list Darko as F-C.  Their natural position is listed first. 

Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818

I'll take the official NBA site over Yahoo Sports everytime.

["THE" MoSav]

nobody knows, we can argue all day...you gotta give each guy more then 2 years to be CLOSE to being able to tell..

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

LOL@ this dumbass.  It's not the same fuckin thing.  Notice they list Darko as F-C.  Their natural position is listed first. 

Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818

I'll take the official NBA site over Yahoo Sports everytime.

Notice how you avoided the main point to ride my nuts over something petty, just like in the Gary Payton thread.

[d-nice]

Like NIK said, Bynum has a better offensive game and already is one of the best passing big men in the league if not the best. And is a very good shot blocker, he keeps alot of blocked shots in bounds which sparks fast breaks. Howard is a beast though. I think he is a better rebounder than Drew but he needs and is working on his offensive moves. Dwight is a little more assertive than Drew, I think alot of that come down to personality. Drew is laid back but when he is aggressive he is tough to stop.

[GangstaBoogy]

Sorry NIK but IMO  Howard easily.

Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?

Dwight Howard still wins both catagories.

[jeromechickenbone]

Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 ()

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...

He'd be starting over Howard?

Dwight Howard = PF-C.

Dwight Howard = C-PF

http://www.nba.com/magic/roster/

Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...

The point was:
C Andrew Bynum
PF Dwight Howard

LOL@ this dumbass.  It's not the same fuckin thing.  Notice they list Darko as F-C.  Their natural position is listed first. 

Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818

I'll take the official NBA site over Yahoo Sports everytime.

Notice how you avoided the main point to ride my nuts over something petty, just like in the Gary Payton thread.

Get off my nuts bitch.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Sorry NIK but IMO  Howard easily.

Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?

Dwight Howard still wins both catagories.

Are you serious? Dwight Howard progressed as much in his second year as Andrew Bynum? LOL.

[GangstaBoogy]

Sorry NIK but IMO  Howard easily.

Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?

Dwight Howard still wins both catagories.

Are you serious? Dwight Howard progressed as much in his second year as Andrew Bynum? LOL.

All this stuff about Bynum progressing is crap. Of course he looks better than he did last season...he's actually getting playing time. a 7-footer only putting up 7 points & 5 rebounds a game doesn't impress me. Dwight Howard in his rookie season was already putting up 12/12.