It's April 24, 2024, 11:31:38 PM
Shallow I agree with what you just said except for this notion that using this as a tool for population control is in some way a theory, when the australian medical journals have talked about it, english journals and the broadsheet newspapers, canadian newspapers, state memorandum 200 clearly outlined the plan for population control, green peace talk about it. I was not trying to suggest that it was the only way in which they would try and seize on this CO2 fever but it is one of many ways. Yes profit and greed and monopoly is a big aspect of it to but ultimately when someone like Michael Meacher declares on a recent channel 4 "debate" about global warming that we have only achieved 5% of our goal so far we need another 55%, he is talking about increasing the blanket of fighting CO2 11 fold, that can only be achieved through the complete micro management of every human being. In fact the sort of micro management needed, would make your headspin, in contemplating the type of control freakery which would be implemented.
Lyrical G the point of this is not to deny that climate change is taking place bur rather to challenge the assertion that man caused the climate change. The fact that so many scientists challenge this assertion and the fact that governments hand pick those who appear at these world summits, should raise alarm bells.
Quote from: virtuoso on December 21, 2007, 11:40:40 AMLyrical G the point of this is not to deny that climate change is taking place bur rather to challenge the assertion that man caused the climate change. The fact that so many scientists challenge this assertion and the fact that governments hand pick those who appear at these world summits, should raise alarm bells. what bout all the calims of the machines and weapons that can change wheaters, make earthquakes and tsunamis? im sure that has an effect on global warming or maybe global warming it self is a weapon
Quote from: THE OVERFIEND on December 23, 2007, 05:16:36 AMI simply could not give two shits for what the article says and I give not a shit for Al Gore either.The truth is that:polluted air is shit to breathand pollution basically makes life shit.The more we pollute, the shittier the Earth gets. However, not everybody is of the intellectual or spiritual capacity required to comprehend such basic concepts. We all agree there but that isn't the problem. Buying hybrids, going solar, nuclear etc are all great because it saves money, but they aren't going after pollution, they are going after carbon dioxide, you know the natural gas that comes out of people? Forget stupid theories like adopting one child policies to reduce population. The real money will be wasted on machines that suck the carbon dioxide out of the gas in factories and plants and planes and those machines will not only cost way too much but they will also create more pollution. The world will not get any cleaner if we go with KYOTO and give in. It'll just get more expensive and less carbon will be produced while the idiots up top get rich and wait for the next scam to pull on the masses.
I simply could not give two shits for what the article says and I give not a shit for Al Gore either.The truth is that:polluted air is shit to breathand pollution basically makes life shit.The more we pollute, the shittier the Earth gets. However, not everybody is of the intellectual or spiritual capacity required to comprehend such basic concepts.
There is no may about it overfiend, if you read through some of the many U.N documents, they admit the impact that the sun is having on climate change. They can not escape it, particularly when the moons of Saturn and Jupiter are also melting. However I disagree with your message, with respect it's steeped in an ideal world undertone. The reality is that no corporation is interested in any form of power which they can not monopolise, or indeed is infinite in resource, as soon as such a possibility came to the fore, it would get shut down because there would be no value to it from their point of view. The long term implications of genetically modified crops are much more horrendous than climate change.