Author Topic: What's your view on gay adoption?  (Read 1830 times)

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #105 on: February 29, 2008, 10:13:39 AM »
Ok, Job, I disagree with you completely, but you have my respect for at least trying to discuss, unlike the Boo Boo guy whose sole occupation seems to be throwing insults at people and who isn't capable of answering even the most simple question (and prefers to click the "diss em" button next to The Roots and wait for you to say something to agree with). You're giving him something to look up to, props for that.

Anyways, thanks for bringing up the predictable "point" of not being able to make babies. That makes things quite easy, because, Job and Boo Boo:

- I take it you think (that one might be tougher for Boo Boo, I see Job confirming it though) lesbians are just as despicable as fags, cause it's not any more natural, obviously. You would never jack off to lesbian porn, ever.

- Shit, you wouldn't ever jack off at all, actually. You have never masturbated, nor would you ever do. It's as useful for making babies as taking it up the ass, hence equally unnatural.

- I take it you would never let a girl suck you off. Oral sex won't help making babies. It's unnatural. Needless to say, the same goes for anal sex.

- Also, you would never use any kind of contraception or let a girl use it. Stuff like condoms or the pill are even more blatantly unnatural than everything else, because they're man-made inventions.

- To sum up, the only kind of sexual action you'd ever engage in is vaginal sex likely to result in pregnancy. That's the one thing sufficiently natural.

If you can't honestly say yes to all of the above, you have obviously lost any kind of argument, unless you got a good point why industrially made latex-based contraceptive devices are the product of mother nature.
LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support homosexuality. are you serious about getting head, oral, condoms etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here....... just tryin to grab at anything to protect homos omg this is too funny wow. you need to seriously sit down and re read what you typed to yourself.... and say to yourself "do eye make sense"
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #106 on: February 29, 2008, 10:16:16 AM »
yo boo boo, its obvious kill is desperate and grabbin for anything to try to justify something thats is just not justifiable like homosexuality.
 

Kill

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5861
  • Karma: 254
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #107 on: February 29, 2008, 10:26:46 AM »
Ok, Job, I disagree with you completely, but you have my respect for at least trying to discuss, unlike the Boo Boo guy whose sole occupation seems to be throwing insults at people and who isn't capable of answering even the most simple question (and prefers to click the "diss em" button next to The Roots and wait for you to say something to agree with). You're giving him something to look up to, props for that.

Anyways, thanks for bringing up the predictable "point" of not being able to make babies. That makes things quite easy, because, Job and Boo Boo:

- I take it you think (that one might be tougher for Boo Boo, I see Job confirming it though) lesbians are just as despicable as fags, cause it's not any more natural, obviously. You would never jack off to lesbian porn, ever.

- Shit, you wouldn't ever jack off at all, actually. You have never masturbated, nor would you ever do. It's as useful for making babies as taking it up the ass, hence equally unnatural.

- I take it you would never let a girl suck you off. Oral sex won't help making babies. It's unnatural. Needless to say, the same goes for anal sex.

- Also, you would never use any kind of contraception or let a girl use it. Stuff like condoms or the pill are even more blatantly unnatural than everything else, because they're man-made inventions.

- To sum up, the only kind of sexual action you'd ever engage in is vaginal sex likely to result in pregnancy. That's the one thing sufficiently natural.

If you can't honestly say yes to all of the above, you have obviously lost any kind of argument, unless you got a good point why industrially made latex-based contraceptive devices are the product of mother nature.
LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support homosexuality. are you serious about getting head, oral, condoms etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here....... just tryin to grab at anything to protect homos omg this is too funny wow. you need to seriously sit down and re read what you typed to yourself.... and say to yourself "do eye make sense"
Eye make a lot of sense, yes. You don't. I know I'm talking to two people virtually incapable of logical argumentation and I am absolutely aware you're never going to say "ok you've got a point". Reasoning is lost on stupidity, that's no news. Still, while there's no hope for Boo Boo you actually tried to discuss before, the fact that you've now stopped confirms you're out of ammo.

The one thing I might be an idiot for is keeping this going, but you people can be interesting in a sense and your reactions are revealing. Therefore new challenge for you: If I was to say the following (notice, this is NOT IN ANY WAY what I really think, it's hypothetical):

"LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support blacks. are you serious about civil rights, racial equality, Rosa Parks etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here"

...what would be the difference to what you just said? I am not the least bit racist, but if I were to say that I would make as much of a point as you: none at all. You haven't answered the question: Why is oral, anal, masturbation, contraception more natural than homosexuality?
« Last Edit: February 29, 2008, 11:54:26 AM by Kill »
 

GunMaster G-9

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
  • Karma: 67
  • click the ''Give Props'' link above
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #108 on: February 29, 2008, 02:37:24 PM »
Ok, Job, I disagree with you completely, but you have my respect for at least trying to discuss, unlike the Boo Boo guy whose sole occupation seems to be throwing insults at people and who isn't capable of answering even the most simple question (and prefers to click the "diss em" button next to The Roots and wait for you to say something to agree with). You're giving him something to look up to, props for that.

Anyways, thanks for bringing up the predictable "point" of not being able to make babies. That makes things quite easy, because, Job and Boo Boo:

- I take it you think (that one might be tougher for Boo Boo, I see Job confirming it though) lesbians are just as despicable as fags, cause it's not any more natural, obviously. You would never jack off to lesbian porn, ever.

- Shit, you wouldn't ever jack off at all, actually. You have never masturbated, nor would you ever do. It's as useful for making babies as taking it up the ass, hence equally unnatural.

- I take it you would never let a girl suck you off. Oral sex won't help making babies. It's unnatural. Needless to say, the same goes for anal sex.

- Also, you would never use any kind of contraception or let a girl use it. Stuff like condoms or the pill are even more blatantly unnatural than everything else, because they're man-made inventions.

- To sum up, the only kind of sexual action you'd ever engage in is vaginal sex likely to result in pregnancy. That's the one thing sufficiently natural.

If you can't honestly say yes to all of the above, you have obviously lost any kind of argument, unless you got a good point why industrially made latex-based contraceptive devices are the product of mother nature.
LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support homosexuality. are you serious about getting head, oral, condoms etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here....... just tryin to grab at anything to protect homos omg this is too funny wow. you need to seriously sit down and re read what you typed to yourself.... and say to yourself "do eye make sense"
Eye make a lot of sense, yes. You don't. I know I'm talking to two people virtually incapable of logical argumentation and I am absolutely aware you're never going to say "ok you've got a point". Reasoning is lost on stupidity, that's no news. Still, while there's no hope for Boo Boo you actually tried to discuss before, the fact that you've now stopped confirms you're out of ammo.

The one thing I might be an idiot for is keeping this going, but you people can be interesting in a sense and your reactions are revealing. Therefore new challenge for you: If I was to say the following (notice, this is NOT IN ANY WAY what I really think, it's hypothetical):

"LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support blacks. are you serious about civil rights, racial equality, Rosa Parks etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here"

...what would be the difference to what you just said? I am not the least bit racist, but if I were to say that I would make as much of a point as you: none at all. You haven't answered the question: Why is oral, anal, masturbation, contraception more natural than homosexuality?

what proves my point that ur a complete iidiiot.

1. I dont like homosexuals and you like homosexuals
2. you think i am a homosexual because i dont like homosexuals and your trying to make fun of me by saying that, but wait aren't you for homosexuals? and if i am a homosexual arent you completely contradicting yourself by trying to make fun of me as a homosexual?

another thing ''Kill' why the fuck you calling yourself kill.... sounds like you want to be the internet thug. you wouldnt hurt a fly let alone ''Kill''. pro homosexual fuck. give me your full name and address if you got some balls and i will make sure i give you a visit some day.
 

K.Dub

  • Magic
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 12677
  • Karma: 1118
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #109 on: February 29, 2008, 02:58:04 PM »
This is fun! :D

kemizt
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #110 on: February 29, 2008, 03:16:40 PM »
Ok, Job, I disagree with you completely, but you have my respect for at least trying to discuss, unlike the Boo Boo guy whose sole occupation seems to be throwing insults at people and who isn't capable of answering even the most simple question (and prefers to click the "diss em" button next to The Roots and wait for you to say something to agree with). You're giving him something to look up to, props for that.

Anyways, thanks for bringing up the predictable "point" of not being able to make babies. That makes things quite easy, because, Job and Boo Boo:

- I take it you think (that one might be tougher for Boo Boo, I see Job confirming it though) lesbians are just as despicable as fags, cause it's not any more natural, obviously. You would never jack off to lesbian porn, ever.

- Shit, you wouldn't ever jack off at all, actually. You have never masturbated, nor would you ever do. It's as useful for making babies as taking it up the ass, hence equally unnatural.

- I take it you would never let a girl suck you off. Oral sex won't help making babies. It's unnatural. Needless to say, the same goes for anal sex.

- Also, you would never use any kind of contraception or let a girl use it. Stuff like condoms or the pill are even more blatantly unnatural than everything else, because they're man-made inventions.

- To sum up, the only kind of sexual action you'd ever engage in is vaginal sex likely to result in pregnancy. That's the one thing sufficiently natural.

If you can't honestly say yes to all of the above, you have obviously lost any kind of argument, unless you got a good point why industrially made latex-based contraceptive devices are the product of mother nature.
LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support homosexuality. are you serious about getting head, oral, condoms etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here....... just tryin to grab at anything to protect homos omg this is too funny wow. you need to seriously sit down and re read what you typed to yourself.... and say to yourself "do eye make sense"
Eye make a lot of sense, yes. You don't. I know I'm talking to two people virtually incapable of logical argumentation and I am absolutely aware you're never going to say "ok you've got a point". Reasoning is lost on stupidity, that's no news. Still, while there's no hope for Boo Boo you actually tried to discuss before, the fact that you've now stopped confirms you're out of ammo.

The one thing I might be an idiot for is keeping this going, but you people can be interesting in a sense and your reactions are revealing. Therefore new challenge for you: If I was to say the following (notice, this is NOT IN ANY WAY what I really think, it's hypothetical):

"LMAO!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you people are sooo fuckin ridiculous eye cant believe you people are going soo far in tryin to support blacks. are you serious about civil rights, racial equality, Rosa Parks etc....... like for real thats the most ridiculous shit eye have seen on here"

...what would be the difference to what you just said? I am not the least bit racist, but if I were to say that I would make as much of a point as you: none at all. You haven't answered the question: Why is oral, anal, masturbation, contraception more natural than homosexuality?
aitte listen you pale faced caucasian dumbass. HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT FUCKIN NATURAL no matter how you try to spin it with your trickology.  what you just said was sooooo fuckin stupid.. but no one is going to say anythin because all you pale faces stick together.......... okay get it...... if you dad was a fuckin homo you wouldnt be here. so shut the fuck up and go march down the street with a rainbow flag. fuckin fagget
 

Kill

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5861
  • Karma: 254
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #111 on: February 29, 2008, 03:47:25 PM »

what proves my point that ur a complete iidiiot.

1. I dont like homosexuals and you like homosexuals
2. you think i am a homosexual because i dont like homosexuals and your trying to make fun of me by saying that, but wait aren't you for homosexuals? and if i am a homosexual arent you completely contradicting yourself by trying to make fun of me as a homosexual?

another thing ''Kill' why the fuck you calling yourself kill.... sounds like you want to be the internet thug. you wouldnt hurt a fly let alone ''Kill''. pro homosexual fuck. give me your full name and address if you got some balls and i will make sure i give you a visit some day.

1. Saying I "like homosexuals" is like saying I like doorknobs, because I'm not particularly fond of them. I just tolerate them. And the thought of two men fucking each other does gross me out, but I am educated and mature enough to accept it. Also, the thought (or sight) of two women making off with each other turning me on, I know what a fucking hypocrit I'd be not to tolerate gays.

2. Heeey, your first attempt to make a point. E for effort. I'm making fun of your homophobic redneck crap and I'm pointing out that people talking that shit seem to be likelier to be closet fags than normal heterosexuals like me according to scientific study. If you are actually gay, I'm only making fun of how you're acting on here, but go ahead and be gay, like I said, I don't mind

3. The "Kill" point is your first valid one, although not related to the subject. It's an abbreviation of an earlier name I had on here and not related to killing, but I know you can't know about that. And last time I checked my balls were still there, but although I doubt you'd book a 2000$ flight to Switzerland, I'm not giving you my address, go ahead and call me a pussy, fag, whatever you wish, won't make you win this argument. Also, I don't know why you'd want to visit me just because you've been "arguing" with me on an internet forum...? But I'm Giuliano, how do you do.

And Job, me repeatedly asking the simple fucking question "why?" not having yielded any result makes me conclude that you've actually given up. But when you lose a debate then of course it's "trickology" and everyone who doesn't agree with that disagrees for the purpose of supporting his Caucasian buddy. Yeah right. If that's really all you got, I actually overestimated you. Sad.
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #112 on: February 29, 2008, 04:10:10 PM »

what proves my point that ur a complete iidiiot.

1. I dont like homosexuals and you like homosexuals
2. you think i am a homosexual because i dont like homosexuals and your trying to make fun of me by saying that, but wait aren't you for homosexuals? and if i am a homosexual arent you completely contradicting yourself by trying to make fun of me as a homosexual?

another thing ''Kill' why the fuck you calling yourself kill.... sounds like you want to be the internet thug. you wouldnt hurt a fly let alone ''Kill''. pro homosexual fuck. give me your full name and address if you got some balls and i will make sure i give you a visit some day.

1. Saying I "like homosexuals" is like saying I like doorknobs, because I'm not particularly fond of them. I just tolerate them. And the thought of two men fucking each other does gross me out, but I am educated and mature enough to accept it. Also, the thought (or sight) of two women making off with each other turning me on, I know what a fucking hypocrit I'd be not to tolerate gays.

2. Heeey, your first attempt to make a point. E for effort. I'm making fun of your homophobic redneck crap and I'm pointing out that people talking that shit seem to be likelier to be closet fags than normal heterosexuals like me according to scientific study. If you are actually gay, I'm only making fun of how you're acting on here, but go ahead and be gay, like I said, I don't mind

3. The "Kill" point is your first valid one, although not related to the subject. It's an abbreviation of an earlier name I had on here and not related to killing, but I know you can't know about that. And last time I checked my balls were still there, but although I doubt you'd book a 2000$ flight to Switzerland, I'm not giving you my address, go ahead and call me a pussy, fag, whatever you wish, won't make you win this argument. Also, I don't know why you'd want to visit me just because you've been "arguing" with me on an internet forum...? But I'm Giuliano, how do you do.

And Job, me repeatedly asking the simple fucking question "why?" not having yielded any result makes me conclude that you've actually given up. But when you lose a debate then of course it's "trickology" and everyone who doesn't agree with that disagrees for the purpose of supporting his Caucasian buddy. Yeah right. If that's really all you got, I actually overestimated you. Sad.
its soo funny you and that eleven guy and someone else.... swear you guys are like the wisest people on here... askin questions. thinkin whatever you say got to be right cuz all " white" etc.... Ya niggas aint wise point blank......... like serious what u just said about oral etc. is a bunch of bullshit......... doesnt even relate ........... but then again. eye am worng because eye am Black.. and your way has to be right cuz your white. just like christian missionaries
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #113 on: February 29, 2008, 04:16:54 PM »
^^^He's basically asking if you tolerate ANY sexual act that isn't for the purpose of bearing children, because in the context of your reasoning against homosexuality, any sexual act that is not natural is not to be tolerated. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anybody on here, but all this damn shit got me interested in your answer to that now. lol
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #114 on: February 29, 2008, 04:26:11 PM »
^^^He's basically asking if you tolerate ANY sexual act that isn't for the purpose of bearing children, because in the context of your reasoning against homosexuality, any sexual act that is not natural is not to be tolerated. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anybody on here, but all this damn shit got me interested in your answer to that now. lol
eye know what he is askin.. he is just playin typical mind games, like the white man always does( trickology). him just tryin to breakin down into well umm masturbation does create life is that natural? oral doesnt create life is that natural? thats stupid.... like if he cant see that homosexuals arent natural then eye dont know what to say...... shit you cant put a plug into a plug and get something... you need a socket and a plug. period.. all these muble jumble words games that this caucasian is tryin to play on me its not workin , so stop...... you keep running your mouth about justifying homosexuality........ and eye hope if you have a child they come out gay. mr.tolerate of homosexuality......
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #115 on: February 29, 2008, 04:38:56 PM »
I never tried to justify homosexuality. its not something i give enough of a fuck about to even try to justify it. Again, i'm not supporting either argument, but your reasoning behind saying homosexuality is not natural is because gays can't produce children, correct?
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #116 on: February 29, 2008, 04:46:37 PM »
I never tried to justify homosexuality. its not something i give enough of a fuck about to even try to justify it. Again, i'm not supporting either argument, but your reasoning behind saying homosexuality is not natural is because gays can't produce children, correct?
eye wasnt talkin about you... eye was talkin to you.. about what "kill" nothing against you. but to answer your question. that is one of the biggest reason. its really simple but "kill" is white and when white people cant win in a argument they try to say shit that doesnt make sense and use that to make it seem like their view is right. its really simple...
 

Sikotic™

Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #117 on: February 29, 2008, 05:38:23 PM »
As far as homosexuality being "unnatural", about 10% of all living creatures that perform sexual reproduction are homosexual. It's fact, look it up.

I guess those gay kangaroos down in the WESSSSSSSIIIIIIIIIIIDE of Australia are digsuting and unnatural, right?

BTW, you didn't answer my question yet, poo poo.
 

Dubz

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Karma: -8
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #118 on: February 29, 2008, 06:23:21 PM »
Aside from Kill, Sikotic, and a few others, the amount of ignorance people are showing in here is disgraceful.
 

GunMaster G-9

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
  • Karma: 67
  • click the ''Give Props'' link above
Re: What's your view on gay adoption?
« Reply #119 on: February 29, 2008, 07:18:12 PM »
As far as homosexuality being "unnatural", about 10% of all living creatures that perform sexual reproduction are homosexual. It's fact, look it up.

I guess those gay kangaroos down in the WESSSSSSSIIIIIIIIIIIDE of Australia are digsuting and unnatural, right?

BTW, you didn't answer my question yet, poo poo.

quick question? what do you think about people having sex with animals? and if a person wants to marry an animal? you think thats ok. he might love his pet dog or what ever alot. same sorta bullshit hey. next thing u know mother fuckers will want to marry cats and dogs. and it will be ok by idiots like u