Author Topic: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges  (Read 488 times)

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #15 on: May 10, 2008, 06:06:26 PM »
i dunno who's worse usher or r kelly. usher = scientologist, r kelly = kiddie fiddler. both pretty ODD.

Mackin

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3124
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1027
  • Can I Live Simply,So That Others can Simply Live..
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #16 on: May 10, 2008, 06:08:10 PM »
i dunno who's worse usher or r kelly. usher = scientologist,
Usher is a Scientologist??
Really when and for how long???
It ain't happenin, Bibles I'm still packin them
And jackin demons wit them 44 magnums" T-Bone

 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #17 on: May 10, 2008, 07:07:20 PM »
since he hooked up with his woman cause she's into it. just google usher scientology - although he is a fairly new recruit so won't be deep into any of it yet...

Mackin

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3124
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1027
  • Can I Live Simply,So That Others can Simply Live..
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #18 on: May 10, 2008, 07:14:07 PM »
Right..Right....
Don't you have to be mega rich, or financially invest heavily to achieve a certain status in the Faith???

Im sure he is just following them cuz of his woman,
It ain't happenin, Bibles I'm still packin them
And jackin demons wit them 44 magnums" T-Bone

 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #19 on: May 10, 2008, 07:31:38 PM »
yup although celebrities get pampered and don't exactly have any problem money wise for the 'voluntary donations'. the higher levels is where you learn all the real crazy stuff (space opera - body thetans) :laugh:

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #20 on: May 10, 2008, 08:35:49 PM »
i dunno who's worse usher or r kelly. usher = scientologist,
Usher is a Scientologist??
Really when and for how long???

a better question is why should that matter?
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #21 on: May 10, 2008, 08:47:41 PM »
Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher
 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #22 on: May 10, 2008, 08:51:48 PM »
it matters cause scientology is not a religion its a crazy cult. and you gotta be an idiot (especially if your a celeb) to get sucked into it...

anyway back on the r kelly topic - he'll obviously beat this case but its a good job they didn't have high definition cameras so much back then...

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #23 on: May 10, 2008, 10:44:52 PM »
it matters cause scientology is not a religion its a crazy cult. and you gotta be an idiot (especially if your a celeb) to get sucked into it...

anyway back on the r kelly topic - he'll obviously beat this case but its a good job they didn't have high definition cameras so much back then...

This may come as a shock to you, but EVERY religion could be considered a "crazy cult." What makes Scientology any less plausible than say Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, Hinduism etc?
 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #24 on: May 11, 2008, 10:04:54 AM »
a hell of a lot actually! but you really gotta read up on it. the main thing being that its very creation was to extort money from people, its openly a pyramid scheme - taking over the world in a nazi like fashion, illegally harassing all serious critics, breaking up families and forcing abortions are policies in areas of it. sure you could argue other religions do a lot of shady things too to but as they aren't 'new religions' there isn't tons and tons of evidence to show thats all they are about - theres a lot more non-profit activty and actual members of other religions despite all the disputes they bring etc etc. if you read the non-scientologists story on the guy who made it up (l ron hubbard) then you'd realise he's a serious serious crackhead.

i mean i'm not hating on the general scientologists (although a lot are stupid/gullible to get into it and give up so much money in the first place) because they obviously do get something out of it at some level/at some stage - but the very idea behind it was to con people and the organisation than runs it is openly corrupt in all areas of operation. to argue otherwise you'd probably have to be a scientologist...

other religions all being a con/illuminati theories is another argument that takes a lot more probing to get at 'the truth' but scientology is so easily exposed as fradulent it aint funny...

NotoriousTDA

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2008, 10:10:59 AM »
Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Usher with your moma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kellz with your baby sister
 

smegma

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #26 on: May 11, 2008, 01:11:15 PM »
Them young hoes knew what they were doin.






Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Yes. R. Kelly has more musical talent in his right pinky toe than Usher does in his whole body.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #27 on: May 11, 2008, 01:18:29 PM »
Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Usher with your moma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kellz with your baby sister

If you're gonna throw out a random diss, at least make it funny.  It needs to motivate me to diss back.
 

Mackin

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3124
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1027
  • Can I Live Simply,So That Others can Simply Live..
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #28 on: May 11, 2008, 07:12:11 PM »
i dunno who's worse usher or r kelly. usher = scientologist,
Usher is a Scientologist??
Really when and for how long???

a better question is why should that matter?
to some degree it should not, however since the aforementioned faith is picking up a lot of Followers, as it is losing them,one can't help but ask why?? or  What is allure of Scientology??
It ain't happenin, Bibles I'm still packin them
And jackin demons wit them 44 magnums" T-Bone

 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #29 on: May 11, 2008, 07:38:14 PM »
a hell of a lot actually! but you really gotta read up on it. the main thing being that its very creation was to extort money from people, its openly a pyramid scheme - taking over the world in a nazi like fashion, illegally harassing all serious critics, breaking up families and forcing abortions are policies in areas of it. sure you could argue other religions do a lot of shady things too to but as they aren't 'new religions' there isn't tons and tons of evidence to show thats all they are about - theres a lot more non-profit activty and actual members of other religions despite all the disputes they bring etc etc. if you read the non-scientologists story on the guy who made it up (l ron hubbard) then you'd realise he's a serious serious crackhead.

i mean i'm not hating on the general scientologists (although a lot are stupid/gullible to get into it and give up so much money in the first place) because they obviously do get something out of it at some level/at some stage - but the very idea behind it was to con people and the organisation than runs it is openly corrupt in all areas of operation. to argue otherwise you'd probably have to be a scientologist...

other religions all being a con/illuminati theories is another argument that takes a lot more probing to get at 'the truth' but scientology is so easily exposed as fradulent it aint funny...

I fail to see the huge difference between that and any other "mainstream" religion. The only notable difference (judging strictly from your own explanation) that I can see is that Scientology doesn't try to hide the fact that they are there to take people's money and control them in some fashion.