Author Topic: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges  (Read 347 times)

NotoriousTDA

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2008, 10:10:59 AM »
Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Usher with your moma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kellz with your baby sister
 

smegma

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #26 on: May 11, 2008, 01:11:15 PM »
Them young hoes knew what they were doin.






Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Yes. R. Kelly has more musical talent in his right pinky toe than Usher does in his whole body.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #27 on: May 11, 2008, 01:18:29 PM »
Kellz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usher

Usher with your moma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kellz with your baby sister

If you're gonna throw out a random diss, at least make it funny.  It needs to motivate me to diss back.
 

Mackin

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3124
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1027
  • Can I Live Simply,So That Others can Simply Live..
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #28 on: May 11, 2008, 07:12:11 PM »
i dunno who's worse usher or r kelly. usher = scientologist,
Usher is a Scientologist??
Really when and for how long???

a better question is why should that matter?
to some degree it should not, however since the aforementioned faith is picking up a lot of Followers, as it is losing them,one can't help but ask why?? or  What is allure of Scientology??
It ain't happenin, Bibles I'm still packin them
And jackin demons wit them 44 magnums" T-Bone

 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #29 on: May 11, 2008, 07:38:14 PM »
a hell of a lot actually! but you really gotta read up on it. the main thing being that its very creation was to extort money from people, its openly a pyramid scheme - taking over the world in a nazi like fashion, illegally harassing all serious critics, breaking up families and forcing abortions are policies in areas of it. sure you could argue other religions do a lot of shady things too to but as they aren't 'new religions' there isn't tons and tons of evidence to show thats all they are about - theres a lot more non-profit activty and actual members of other religions despite all the disputes they bring etc etc. if you read the non-scientologists story on the guy who made it up (l ron hubbard) then you'd realise he's a serious serious crackhead.

i mean i'm not hating on the general scientologists (although a lot are stupid/gullible to get into it and give up so much money in the first place) because they obviously do get something out of it at some level/at some stage - but the very idea behind it was to con people and the organisation than runs it is openly corrupt in all areas of operation. to argue otherwise you'd probably have to be a scientologist...

other religions all being a con/illuminati theories is another argument that takes a lot more probing to get at 'the truth' but scientology is so easily exposed as fradulent it aint funny...

I fail to see the huge difference between that and any other "mainstream" religion. The only notable difference (judging strictly from your own explanation) that I can see is that Scientology doesn't try to hide the fact that they are there to take people's money and control them in some fashion.
 

Mackin

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3124
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1027
  • Can I Live Simply,So That Others can Simply Live..
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #30 on: May 11, 2008, 07:41:43 PM »
a hell of a lot actually! but you really gotta read up on it. the main thing being that its very creation was to extort money from people, its openly a pyramid scheme - taking over the world in a nazi like fashion, illegally harassing all serious critics, breaking up families and forcing abortions are policies in areas of it. sure you could argue other religions do a lot of shady things too to but as they aren't 'new religions' there isn't tons and tons of evidence to show thats all they are about - theres a lot more non-profit activty and actual members of other religions despite all the disputes they bring etc etc. if you read the non-scientologists story on the guy who made it up (l ron hubbard) then you'd realise he's a serious serious crackhead.

i mean i'm not hating on the general scientologists (although a lot are stupid/gullible to get into it and give up so much money in the first place) because they obviously do get something out of it at some level/at some stage - but the very idea behind it was to con people and the organisation than runs it is openly corrupt in all areas of operation. to argue otherwise you'd probably have to be a scientologist...

other religions all being a con/illuminati theories is another argument that takes a lot more probing to get at 'the truth' but scientology is so easily exposed as fradulent it aint funny...

I fail to see the huge difference between that and any other "mainstream" religion. The only notable difference (judging strictly from your own explanation) that I can see is that Scientology doesn't try to hide the fact that they are there to take people's money and control them in some fashion.
In the same vein, does that not beg the question Why??..If it's so obvious why are peole follwoing it???
It ain't happenin, Bibles I'm still packin them
And jackin demons wit them 44 magnums" T-Bone

 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2008, 09:11:16 PM »
this argument could go on for a very long time. i'm just gonna shut up and finish by saying scientology is a LOT more dubious than any other 'religion' in terms of its practices, beliefs and focus on profit. its a cult in its purest form and will always lie in the face of criticism. i wouldn't mention it in the same breath as the other main religions of the world.

that is my opinion from what i've read and what i know to be true about it. if you think otherwise or want to put the other religions on the same level as scientology then fair enough, but i'd urge you to read everything out there on scientology first. its outrageous that it could even exist this long in the first place but its probably gonna be finished within the next few years...

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2008, 09:37:38 PM »
^^^^Not to continue hijacking the thread, but why do you think Scientology will be gone in a few years?
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2008, 09:50:13 PM »
a hell of a lot actually! but you really gotta read up on it. the main thing being that its very creation was to extort money from people, its openly a pyramid scheme - taking over the world in a nazi like fashion, illegally harassing all serious critics, breaking up families and forcing abortions are policies in areas of it. sure you could argue other religions do a lot of shady things too to but as they aren't 'new religions' there isn't tons and tons of evidence to show thats all they are about - theres a lot more non-profit activty and actual members of other religions despite all the disputes they bring etc etc. if you read the non-scientologists story on the guy who made it up (l ron hubbard) then you'd realise he's a serious serious crackhead.

i mean i'm not hating on the general scientologists (although a lot are stupid/gullible to get into it and give up so much money in the first place) because they obviously do get something out of it at some level/at some stage - but the very idea behind it was to con people and the organisation than runs it is openly corrupt in all areas of operation. to argue otherwise you'd probably have to be a scientologist...

other religions all being a con/illuminati theories is another argument that takes a lot more probing to get at 'the truth' but scientology is so easily exposed as fradulent it aint funny...

I fail to see the huge difference between that and any other "mainstream" religion. The only notable difference (judging strictly from your own explanation) that I can see is that Scientology doesn't try to hide the fact that they are there to take people's money and control them in some fashion.
In the same vein, does that not beg the question Why??..If it's so obvious why are peole follwoing it???

maybe they appreciate the honesty? lol I couldnt tell you. you'd have to ask a scientologist. anything i have to say about why people follow ANY religion is pure speculation.
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2008, 09:51:56 PM »
this argument could go on for a very long time. i'm just gonna shut up and finish by saying scientology is a LOT more dubious than any other 'religion' in terms of its practices, beliefs and focus on profit. its a cult in its purest form and will always lie in the face of criticism. i wouldn't mention it in the same breath as the other main religions of the world.

that is my opinion from what i've read and what i know to be true about it. if you think otherwise or want to put the other religions on the same level as scientology then fair enough, but i'd urge you to read everything out there on scientology first. its outrageous that it could even exist this long in the first place but its probably gonna be finished within the next few years...

Translation: "Scientology really isn't much different or less plausible than any other religion so I'm going to exit the discussion gracefully while I still can."
 

Matty

Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #35 on: May 12, 2008, 06:37:36 AM »
translation: whatever i say about scientology someone else is gonna say that other religions do the same/very similar things regardless

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #36 on: May 12, 2008, 02:28:56 PM »
LOL you haven't said anything about it that sets it apart from any other religion in any significant way. Every religion is a cult.
 

Eddie G.

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9708
  • Karma: 883
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #37 on: May 12, 2008, 04:38:06 PM »
New Kellz, club joint with the autotune again:

R Kelly - Bobble

http://www.zshare.net/audio/11917359443fb436/
 

smegma

  • Guest
Re: R. Kelly on Trial for Child Porn Charges
« Reply #38 on: May 12, 2008, 04:48:58 PM »

^ Terrible.