Author Topic: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?  (Read 1976 times)

RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND!

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #50 on: March 26, 2009, 10:55:04 PM »


In a court of law, objective evidence and enough subjective personal testimony will usually allow you a verdict on the existence and facts of an event. A really strong arguement needs a combination of both types of supporting evidence.


With this ufo and alien shit, if you look into it; the documented personal and historical cultural testimony is huge, its undeniable.




Just like the existence of Satan, so i can go shootup my school and claim that satan possessed me and made me do it. The court of law would have to believe me and find me innocent as there are huge amounts of objective/subjective/documented historical/cultural evidence on demonic possessions to acquit me.



LOL you angry angry young man. Well if you wanted to get away with that, it would still be ideal to have a combination of both forms of supporting evidence for a strong arguement in your case. Even if you had normative  subjective evidence of demonic possession there is not really any objective, scientific evidence of demonic possession to support it. With the aliens, the subjective evidence is huge, its undeniable that there is subjective evidence there. Whats lacking is the objective evidence to support it. People seen aliens, but they don't have the alien with them to prove it. Thats why its real for them subjectively, for other people to believe them they need objective evidence to support the subjective testimony.






 

« Last Edit: March 27, 2009, 12:14:28 AM by RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND »
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #51 on: March 26, 2009, 11:51:02 PM »


In a court of law, objective evidence and enough subjective personal testimony will usually allow you a verdict on the existence and facts of an event. A really strong arguement needs a combination of both types of supporting evidence.


With this ufo and alien shit, if you look into it; the documented personal and historical cultural testimony is huge, its undeniable.




Just like the existence of Satan, so i can go shootup my school and claim that satan possessed me and made me do it. The court of law would have to believe me and find me innocent as there are huge amounts of objective/subjective/documented historical/cultural evidence on demonic possessions to acquit me.



LOL you angry angry young man. Well if you wanted to get away with that, it would still be ideal to have a combination of both forms of supporting evidence for a strong arguement in your case. Even if you had normative and subjective evidence of demonic possession there is not really any objective, scientific evidence of demonic possession to support it. With the aliens, the subjective evidence is huge, its undeniable that there is subjective evidence there. Whats lacking is the objective evidence to support it. People seen aliens, but they don't have the alien with them to prove it. Thats why its real for them subjectively, for other people to believe them they need objective evidence to support the subjective testimony.






 



Same with Satan and demonic shit. You look at most religions, the subjective evidence in holy books and just plain subjective evidence itself is huge. Theres a church by my old house where people saw a demonic possesion every Sunday. I think it was all some kind of hooax/money making scheme but some of my friends/neighbours really believed in satan and demonic possesion. When it comes to subjective evidence, geographically, people in my location would rather believe in Satan and demonic possessions rather than aliens. Youre saying people seen aliens and theres huge subjective evidence, well people before aliens became popular used to see ghosts/satan all the time so the subjective evidence for this is huge as well.

« Last Edit: March 26, 2009, 11:54:39 PM by ωεεźγ ғ »
 

RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND!

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #52 on: March 27, 2009, 12:29:44 AM »
^

yes but the difference between subjective evidence for demons and the subjective evidence for aliens is that the latter is much more credible, people from across a much wider demographic and from a huge range of professional occupations can provide subjective evidence for UFOs and aliens.


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFsSKCax2CY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/RFsSKCax2CY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1</a>


Presidents, personnel from all across the defence force and government, commerical and government pilots, air traffic controllers, NASA staff, etc.


 


In comparison, the subjective evidence for demons is not so credible and is much more isloated to a smaller specific demographic group, thats is; overtly religious individuals of usually low educational background.



« Last Edit: March 27, 2009, 12:35:51 AM by RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND »
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #53 on: March 27, 2009, 12:40:48 AM »
Which President had had a subjective experience with aliens? But just because one amount of subjective evidence is huge does not make it credible as you claim. In Rome, during its peak, the wider demographical belief was in demons and shit just because they would see people acting schizo/or simply sick and connect it with satan. That made satan huge evidence subjecitively but just because that kind of subjective evidence was huge in Rome during 54 BC does not mean it is credible.

P.S Rome during its peak was huge, so I am also speaking of a wide demographic range
 

RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND!

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #54 on: March 27, 2009, 02:10:00 AM »
If you possessed the ability to comprehend the basic communicative language and reasoning of my previous post you would have understood the issue isn't that the subjective evidence is simply 'huge', the point is: compared to subjective claims of demonic possession, the subjective evidence of UFOs and aliens is of a higher quality spread over a larger and broader demographic of people from various occupations and is not confined to one particular time or place throughout history or the globe.


President Carter reported seeing a UFO, look furthure into it all yourself, or don't.


"One thing's for sure, I'll never make fun of people who say they've seen unidentified objects in the sky. If I become President, I'll make every piece of information this country has about UFO sightings available to the public and the scientists."
                                                -US President Carter (while running for election, after becoming President he distanced himself from his election promise citing security concerns).





« Last Edit: March 27, 2009, 02:28:25 AM by RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND »
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #55 on: March 27, 2009, 10:20:34 AM »
If you possessed the ability to comprehend the basic communicative language and reasoning of my previous post you would have understood  the issue isn't that the subjective evidence is simply 'huge', the point is: compared to subjective claims of demonic possession, the subjective evidence of UFOs and aliens is of a higher quality spread over a larger and broader demographic of people from various occupations and is not confined to one particular time or place throughout history or the globe.

President Carter reported seeing a UFO, look furthure into it all yourself, or don't.


"One thing's for sure, I'll never make fun of people who say they've seen unidentified objects in the sky. If I become President, I'll make every piece of information this country has about UFO sightings available to the public and the scientists."
                                                -US President Carter (while running for election, after becoming President he distanced himself from his election promise citing security concerns).







Theres lots of reports also stating that Carter never saw anything and this move on his part was a popularity one as he new lots of knuckleheads in the country were believing in UFO crap and in turn those knuckleheads voted in this knucklehead, who ended up not doing anything on the apparent info on UFO's. Plus there are tons of scholastic journals which have claimed that what Carter actually saw that day was Venus, same goes for your 'trained professionals'

"Mr. Carter is in good company in misidentifying Venus as a UFO. Many highly trained and responsible persons, including airplane pilots, scientists, policemen, and military personnel, have made the same mistake. During World War II, U.S. aircraft tried to shoot down Venus on numerous occasions, believing it to be an enemy aircraft. In October of 1973, Ohio Governor John Gilligan made headlines by reportedly sighting a UFO. Governor Gilligan's "UFO" turned out to be a misidentification of the planet Mars." Robert Shaeffer, Humanist 77 pp. 46

P.s. You did not specify the bolded portion in your eariler post that is why I threw in the Rome example. So theres no need to get frustrated and claim that I don't understand basic communication or logic when you are not making yourself clear.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2009, 10:25:56 AM by ωεεźγ ғ »
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #56 on: March 27, 2009, 04:43:31 PM »
I like

Let me know if you check out those vids.