Author Topic: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?  (Read 2920 times)

the ghost

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #30 on: March 25, 2009, 10:04:04 AM »
I don't know if they will let us die or not, but I agree with alot of what you just said.  I think that any alien species that could visit us would have, hopefully atleast,  advanced much past our current emotional level.  But I also worry that they may view us as we view a ant.  How much regard do we have for their lives.  True we may be the dominate species on this planet but that may be a joke to a form of aliens.  I mean we visited another celestial body a few years back and the first god damn thing we did was plant a flag!
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #31 on: March 25, 2009, 10:11:53 AM »
. Fuck up Earth too bad? From what I can tell you, we've fucked Earth up enough already starting from natural resources all the way to stock emissions up in our ozones. If anyone/anything was going to intervene, it would have done so by now. I like many peoples logic on here, but they are making such strong statements about the existence of 'god' and 'aliens' without any concrete evidence that it turns into a self defeating argument.
 

Primo

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2615
  • Karma: 46
  • I just want to fit in!
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #32 on: March 25, 2009, 10:38:05 AM »

I think those of you who do think they are thinking outside of the box, aren't looking at this logically. Now let's suppose that there were aliens or what have you and it was oh so apparent to us, why would the government cover up something like that? the answer clearly can not be because they don't want to alarm the public, after all, the method of whipping the general public into a frenzy, into a state of fear, alerted paranoia that terrorists are going to strike has now become such a common place, that we don't even talk about it anymore it's become a normality.

So what is clear to me is that this strikes much closer to home, I watched an interesting Bill Cooper youtube video in which he raises this very subject and focuses in on the fact that for over 50 years we have been conditioned to accept that aliens are roaming around the earths sky's. We have been conditioned to react with the notion"that's not human" but the idea that something isn't human particularly in relation to it's looks, does not mean it was not created by humans. However the very letters UFO immediately create images of something out of this world.

Now we know the elite of the world are pure evil, we also know that to a large degree even those that rubbish the notion of manufactured terrorism know all about it. So therefore this greatly limits the ability of that cabal government to not necessarily pull it off although the police state does make that harder to sell to the public, but increasingly it's no longer having the same impact. To put this into context, there are some who would love mass death, it hasn't stopped them in the past and the way they see it is they are doing their best for humanity and therfore mass murder is a necessary evil to achieve their aims.

Therefore if these aren't UFOS and in fact they are a product of many years of secret testing and research which has created aircraft drones which do indeed look like nothing else we have witnessed and behave like nothing we have experienced before, then we need to quickly rethink the paradigms. This is clearly at the very least feasible, after all the whole point of secret testing is to keep the wraps on any given study, then don't think for a moment that those bastards would not and have not entertained the idea of using these "UFOS" as a means of creating the visions created by H G Wells/ If you recall war of the worlds for instance, in which eventually the earth would would be saved and the threat wiped out, then the aftershock would be so great and the scars so deep that it would leave the world in such a turbulent monumental mess, that all of their plans could take shape.

I hasten to add, I am not saying this is going to happen, more so it's what could happen. I also think that it's yet another example of the misunderstanding gap that exists from not reading books because it's not surprising to say that so much of what was mentioned in science fiction books some 70 plus years ago, is now unfolding, or in the midst of unfolding. None of that has happened by accident, in the same vein that George Orwell was not some magical prophet, he wasn't a visionary, he was a guy that had worked within the bowels of the intelligence services and was privy to the blueprint which had been designed for the world.

My best guess if this is the case, would lead to think that the reason why the mainstream media have now been given the green light to document this, to report it a conventional manner, is because they feel the public has now bought into this. There are lots of empirical pieces which hold up that this might be the case, but none as bizarre and creepy as to when Regan suddenly went completely outside of the theme of his speech and suddenly starting talking about if there was a threat from outside this world, then it would bring the people of the world together.

Here is another telling quote

Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."
- Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992.



They don't admit their existence because once the cat's outta the bag, the powers that be lose their power.  Think about this - Mainstream science looks at only four fields of energy. You have electrical, magnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear force. Those four forces are believed to comprise the entire universe in terms of its energy — more when you get into Russia and a lot of alternative Western research as well.

But mainstream science in Russia has identified another field that they call the torsion field. Now, in Western science you do have a torsion field. In the Western model, it is just essentially some of the spinning movement that happens within an atom.

But the Russians have decided that this spinning movement [also] travels between atoms — it doesn’t just stay in the atom. And that’s actually this whole new field, which seems to be more coupled up with gravity than it is with electromagnetic energy.

There’s been a lot of scientific studies that have shown some really compelling stuff to prove that this energy not only exists, [but we can build working technologies out of it.] In fact, there’s a guy in Germany named Dr. Hartmut Müller who has invented a cell-phone that runs on torsion fields rather than electromagnetic energy.

That means you could be in concrete bunkers miles underground and get a cell-phone call just as clear as if you’re on the surface. And because these fields don’t travel at light speed — they travel effectively instantaneously — you could be hanging out at the edge of the solar system and talk to somebody in real time with no delay.   

If this energy is tapped, it's free and limitless.  All the sudden you have little to no need for the traditional sources of energy on our planet.  So think what this means for corporations, take pharmaceuticals.  They don't cure anything - there's no money in that.  They come up with a pill you have to take everyday so you are a life long customer.  They don't want to admit that there is limitless energy supply because once they do, they don't have the $ and without that they have no control. 

Of course, TV & Hollywood have shown us actual real ET stuff mixed in with extremely crazy cooky shit to make you think that if there are indeed aliens, they are scary and evil.  There are evil ones, but there are also benevolent ones.  And all are similar looking to us on Earth, not mutated crazy monsters. 

So while you're arguing that if there were ET's the govt would acknowledge them and use that as a control mechanism.  The problem with that is this - once the general public acknowledges the existance of ET's, we will certainly have much more encounters w/ them.  The reason we don't have more now is because they don't impose on our free will.  It's kind of universal law - love for self, for others, for everything.  No manipulation, no negativity.  And as a society, we haven't yet showed that we are ready.  They watch us from far away and see that we can't even get along with ourselves, how in the hell are we going to mesh with the inter-galactic community.  They view us as little children at this point, and I don't blame them.  And after we start having standard contact, people will realize that many are very loving and sympathetic, and want to help us.  They are vastly technologically superior to us.  Once the cat's outta the bag, the establishment's power is gone.
I agree with pretty much everything you just said. I have been studying nanotechnology and in the area of new physics just out of interest. There is an interesting theory called "Zero Point Energy". The theory is that you give a superconductive material a certain vibrational frequency. The higher the vibrational frequency goes the less mass the superconductor becomes. If the vibration becomes great enough it will eventually hit a zero mass point (and becomes only visible in infared spectrum). At the zero mass point it literally takes very little energy to go speeds faster than the speed of light. As for physical bodies not being able to take the g-forces of that type of travel. There has been experiments that inside a electromagnetic field alot of the gravitational effects are not felt.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #33 on: March 25, 2009, 12:59:00 PM »
. Fuck up Earth too bad? From what I can tell you, we've fucked Earth up enough already starting from natural resources all the way to stock emissions up in our ozones. If anyone/anything was going to intervene, it would have done so by now. I like many peoples logic on here, but they are making such strong statements about the existence of 'god' and 'aliens' without any concrete evidence that it turns into a self defeating argument.

Read up on the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk.  We've reverse engineered tech from Roswell and did some pretty amazing stuff. 
 

3rd Coast

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 490
  • Showin naked ass in the great state of Texas
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #34 on: March 25, 2009, 01:09:43 PM »
the bermuda triangle is the entrance to the centre of the earth 8)

nall the 5th dimension ...i know this old dude who is always talkin bout the bermuda triangle and was in the navy...said they were trained off the eastern coast of florida...its certain spots they couldnt go....the area the bermuda triangle covers was one of the spots...

that told him right that the shit is real...
 

the ghost

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #35 on: March 25, 2009, 04:32:56 PM »
Watched part of the Abyss  on TV this weekend.  That's some trippy but corny stuff right there.
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #36 on: March 25, 2009, 06:04:33 PM »
. Fuck up Earth too bad? From what I can tell you, we've fucked Earth up enough already starting from natural resources all the way to stock emissions up in our ozones. If anyone/anything was going to intervene, it would have done so by now. I like many peoples logic on here, but they are making such strong statements about the existence of 'god' and 'aliens' without any concrete evidence that it turns into a self defeating argument.

Read up on the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk.  We've reverse engineered tech from Roswell and did some pretty amazing stuff. 

Roswell happened in 1947 while the Philidelphia Experiment happened in 1943. So there is no way the Roswell stuff was reverse engineered to be used in the Philidelphia project. Can not take all of these events for any face value except Roswell, as it is the one event with several witnesses, whose reports were consistent and everything to do with other experiments/events, the reports from those involved were fairly incosistent. Still these things do not prove God or even Aliens really.
 

RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND!

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2009, 12:44:09 AM »


In a court of law, objective evidence and enough subjective personal testimony will usually allow you a verdict on the existence and facts of an event. A really strong arguement needs a combination of both types of supporting evidence.


With this ufo and alien shit, if you look into it; the documented personal and historical cultural testimony is huge, its undeniable.


« Last Edit: March 26, 2009, 02:55:22 AM by RETURN OF THE OVERFIEND »
 

alcoolholic

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2009, 06:29:17 AM »
man lets say there are UFO's on earth now... imagine if the world found out we're being studied just like we study fucking baboons...

people would go nuts, everything we have ever known would be flipped upside down. the effects would be cataclismic.

and scrolling up the page, some of you post some big ass essays  :o
« Last Edit: March 26, 2009, 06:31:56 AM by alcoolholic »
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #39 on: March 26, 2009, 08:47:08 AM »
. Fuck up Earth too bad? From what I can tell you, we've fucked Earth up enough already starting from natural resources all the way to stock emissions up in our ozones. If anyone/anything was going to intervene, it would have done so by now. I like many peoples logic on here, but they are making such strong statements about the existence of 'god' and 'aliens' without any concrete evidence that it turns into a self defeating argument.

Read up on the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk.  We've reverse engineered tech from Roswell and did some pretty amazing stuff. 

Roswell happened in 1947 while the Philidelphia Experiment happened in 1943. So there is no way the Roswell stuff was reverse engineered to be used in the Philidelphia project. Can not take all of these events for any face value except Roswell, as it is the one event with several witnesses, whose reports were consistent and everything to do with other experiments/events, the reports from those involved were fairly incosistent. Still these things do not prove God or even Aliens really.

The PE obviously wasn't, but we have indeed reverse engineered lots of tech from Roswell...Do you believe crop circles are man made?

Here's a story about a 90 year old man who just recently answered some questions about Roswell and said there were indeed aliens:

Roswell Fireman Confesses-It WAS a Flying Saucer by Anthony Bragalia

 
Friday, March 06, 2009

A firefighter who was with the Roswell Fire Department in 1947 has confirmed that the mysterious crash in the New Mexico desert that Summer was in fact of an unearthly craft!

The firefighter, now age 90, related stunning information to this author in a lengthy interview conducted recently. Respected Roswell author Kevin Randle also talked with the involved fireman to confirm the details of his story.

Some time ago I located the son of Rue Chrisman. Rue was the Fire Chief for the Roswell Fire Department in 1947, passing in 1981 at age 98. Chrisman's son explained to me that he knew that the town's Fire Department was somehow involved in the crash event. But the son was sparse in his conversation, not really wishing to elaborate. When pressed, the son said, "It did happen. There was a big coverup. The crash was real." I asked him how he knew of this, he paused and said, "I knew too many who knew."

I then asked him if any Roswell Firemen from 1947 are still alive. He replied that there was still "one left." He only mentioned the surviving fireman's surname as "Smith" and that one of his family members attends the same church as the involved fireman. Working with Kevin Randle, we identified and located the elderly gentleman and sought his testimony.

When reached, the Fireman was somewhat hesitant to discuss the matter. But after some "small talk" he warmed up to discussion. In a far-ranging conversation, the Fireman related these incredible details:

- An intimidating Colonel from Roswell Army Air Field visited the Roswell Fire Department immediately after the crash. The Colonel explained to the fireman who were at the department that day that an "unknown object from someplace else" had crashed in the desert outside Roswell.

The Colonel warned that no one was to speak about the event to anyone ever. He also commanded them that nobody was to go out to the site or respond to any inquiries about the event. He explained that "everything was being handled by the military."

- Dan Dwyer, another Roswell Fire Department firefighter, did manage to go out to see the crash site, defying the Colonels orders. He confirms some of the details that Dan Dwyer's daughter, Frankie Rowe, has related in numerous interviews over the years. Frankie maintains that her father was able to view the craft and its occupants.

- Dan related to him that the area surrounding the crash was secured and cordoned by armed guards. Firemen went out there on their own volition, not as a "department." The Fireman did not want to talk too much about Dan Dwyer and Frankie Rowe though.

- The crash was of a craft not from Earth. The Fireman explained that it was not a balloon or any type of military experiment. He said that it was a "UFO."

When I said to him that the term "UFO" was not used back then... he said it was "unidentified- a flying saucer."

I asked him how he knew this and he stated that he was certain it was because of "what I was told at the time it happened." He explained that the Colonel did not know what the craft was or from where it came... and that there was great concern over the situation.

- The Roswell City Manager knew about the event and came into the Fire Department to personally and forcefully order the department to say nothing of the crash. Although the Fireman could not recall the City Manager's name at the time, I knew who it was.

When I mentioned the name "C.M. Woodbury" to him, he said that did seem to be the name. As it happens, C.M. Woodbury would have been a very intimidating individual with whom to reckon. This is because C.M. Woodbury was known as the "Iron Major" - a decorated War vet of the notoriously effective 752nd Tank Battallion. Woodbury was also very close friends with Butch Blanchard, the Roswell Army Air Field base Commander.

- The Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) base Fire Department was heavily involved in the crash recovery. The Fireman explained that "this is where the confusion comes from." The Fire Department that was most heavily involved in the crash retrieval was not so much the city fire department but the base's own Fire Department. He asserted that the RAAF firemen "knew the most" about the event. He was unfortunately unable to recall the names of these firemen.

- The Roswell Sheriff's Department was engaged in the coverup of the crash. The Fireman confirmed that Deputy Tommy Thompson was someone he knew at the Sherrif's office who was told to "keep the quiet."

- When asked how he "dealt with the fact that a craft from another world had crashed near Roswell," the Fireman replied that they had no idea what the implications were, "we just didn't really ever think about those kind of things at that time, but I do now."

The Fireman's testimony is nothing short of amazing. It confirms the unknown nature of the Roswell crash in 1947. It is, however, testimony. I appreciate the difficulties with "testimony." Testimony includes utterances that are presented as evidence for the claims they express. There is an inherent problem with all testimony. The speaker's reliability and sincerity are supported only by words rather than documents, photographs or other physical evidence. I appreciate that the Fireman's words are not sufficient to justify the belief that the crash at Roswell was extraterrestrial.

However, when testimony is given by an individual who is in fact who he says he is and who did not come forward but instead was "found," we should pay attention to that testimony. And the truth of the event does not depend on taking the speaker's word alone as evidence of truth.

But the Fireman's testimony is of special importance because he has never come forward publicly before with his story and he has no apparent reason or motivation to lie.

The Fireman's full name will not be released until his death. He is in the last years of life, living out his days peacefully with close family. Author Kevin Randle also talked with the Fireman after I did, and agrees that a barrage of calls and contacts to the elderly man by skeptics and others would be a disservice to an old man.

It is said that when a man becomes a Fireman, his greatest act of bravery has been accomplished. In this case though, the old Fireman's greatest act of bravery was to tell what he knew about the Roswell event for the sake of history and truth.

permanent link: http://www.ufocasebook.com/2009/firemanconfesses.html
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #40 on: March 26, 2009, 03:20:27 PM »
I have a hard time believing the source from which you got the article from as 'ufocasebook' when i explored through it seemed like a site that strongly advocates the existence of UFO's. This is just like me pulling out an article from 'whitepower.com' about how skin color determines intelligence level. And that article also got 'witnesses (from experiments)' and 'scientists' claiming that the darker your skin pigmentation, the lower your intelligence.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2009, 03:25:14 PM by ωεεźγ ғ »
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #41 on: March 26, 2009, 03:24:08 PM »


In a court of law, objective evidence and enough subjective personal testimony will usually allow you a verdict on the existence and facts of an event. A really strong arguement needs a combination of both types of supporting evidence.


With this ufo and alien shit, if you look into it; the documented personal and historical cultural testimony is huge, its undeniable.




Just like the existence of Satan, so i can go shootup my school and claim that satan possessed me and made me do it. The court of law would have to believe me and find me innocent as there are huge amounts of objective/subjective/documented historical/cultural evidence on demonic possessions to acquit me.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #42 on: March 26, 2009, 03:43:41 PM »
I have a hard time believing the source from which you got the article from as 'ufocasebook' when i explored through it seemed like a site that strongly advocates the existence of UFO's. This is just like me pulling out an article from 'whitepower.com' about how skin color determines intelligence level. And that article also got 'witnesses (from experiments)' and 'scientists' claiming that the darker your skin pigmentation, the lower your intelligence.

lol, do you even know who Kevin Randle is?  He's arguably the greatest expert on Roswell, has done endless amounts of research.  He interviewed this man as well and verified the story. 

And where do you recommend looking for UFO information...foxnews.com? 

Do you believe crop circles are man made?
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #43 on: March 26, 2009, 03:49:55 PM »


In a court of law, objective evidence and enough subjective personal testimony will usually allow you a verdict on the existence and facts of an event. A really strong arguement needs a combination of both types of supporting evidence.


With this ufo and alien shit, if you look into it; the documented personal and historical cultural testimony is huge, its undeniable.




Just like the existence of Satan, so i can go shootup my school and claim that satan possessed me and made me do it. The court of law would have to believe me and find me innocent as there are huge amounts of objective/subjective/documented historical/cultural evidence on demonic possessions to acquit me.

Satan can't posses you unless you allow him to.  So therefore, it's still you that did it even if you were possessed.  Besides, you'd have to have everyone in your school witness that you were indeed possessed by the devil in order to get not guilty.  Only under those circumstances would the parallel that you drew actually hold merit.
 

ωεεźγ ғ

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2494
  • Karma: -202
Re: Fuck a UFO, whos heard of an USO?
« Reply #44 on: March 26, 2009, 03:57:16 PM »
I have a hard time believing the source from which you got the article from as 'ufocasebook' when i explored through it seemed like a site that strongly advocates the existence of UFO's. This is just like me pulling out an article from 'whitepower.com' about how skin color determines intelligence level. And that article also got 'witnesses (from experiments)' and 'scientists' claiming that the darker your skin pigmentation, the lower your intelligence.

lol, do you even know who Kevin Randle is?  He's arguably the greatest expert on Roswell, has done endless amounts of research.  He interviewed this man as well and verified the story. 

And where do you recommend looking for UFO information...foxnews.com? 

Do you believe crop circles are man made?

Where did I mention foxnews.com? Although foxnews.com is one news source that I personally recommend you should not look at for accurate non-bias information on anything. I've read some things on crop circles but my knowledge on them is not as extensive enough for me to comment on.