Author Topic: Charlie Sheen demands Obama investigate 9/11; says it was masterminded by Bu  (Read 223 times)

C-BLUE

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380
  • Karma: -359
  • evil don't die
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/09/11/2009-09-11_charlie_sheen_demands_obama_investigate_911_says_attack_was_masterminded_by_bush.html

Every two years or so this muthafucca goes on tv and shares his schizophrenic views with the world. Why would anyone give a fucc what Charlie Sheen thinks. Yet they put this shit in the papers and whats worse is...people listen and actually talk about it like he might have a fuccin point.
 

Cali Climate

  • Guest
I read that interview he snagged with Obama on infowars. I'm sure that was a huge waste of valuable time for the president.
 

C-BLUE

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380
  • Karma: -359
  • evil don't die
I read that interview he snagged with Obama on infowars. I'm sure that was a huge waste of valuable time for the president.

that wasnt an actual interview though. if the president actually did meet this idiot then i'd lose all respect for him. period.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/sheen-challenges-911-truth-debunkers-to-larry-king-live-debate.html

 

Matty

9/11 was blatantly an inside job. you don't need to be a genius or a conspiracy theorist to figure that one out. sorry guys, keep eating the media lies.

Blasphemy

  • Guest
9/11 was blatantly an inside job. you don't need to be a genius or a conspiracy theorist to figure that one out. sorry guys, keep eating the media lies.

I'm all for the REAL truth movement. See here is the sad thing the Truth Movement is infested with their ONE way view. When in reality its a combination of events. Though, there is still unknowns that won't ever be known as such speculation happens and false evidence garners support for BOTH sides.
 

C-BLUE

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380
  • Karma: -359
  • evil don't die
9/11 was blatantly an inside job. you don't need to be a genius or a conspiracy theorist to figure that one out. sorry guys, keep eating the media lies.

right...you know how many people you'd need to be in on that fuccin conspiracy?. if that is an inside job then that is possibly the biggest, the most complex and most successful inside job in the entire universe. they could not pull this shit off without anybody saying anything. honestly..do you really believe that shit???. And forget about it being the most spectacular conspiracy ever pulled off..You really think this makes sense?. You kill your own people so you can go to war with another country?. You got everybody in this country watching everybody. the republicans are watching the democrats and the democrats are watching the republicans. you got all these fuccin agencies. internal affairs. you got muthafuccas watching internal affairs. I mean come on man.
 

Matty

:laugh: turn off the tv man. its entirely possible and its fact that similar things have been done in the past by the US to initiate wars. charlie sheen goes into some of that in his letter if you bothered to read it.

and i dunno about it being fully successful, or there wouldn't be so many unanswered questions and spin by the media when it comes people questioning the 'official story'. most of the people who did the official investigation accept their report is pretty much lies. another thing he mentions in the letter.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 08:04:28 PM by Matty »
 

Cali Climate

  • Guest
I like how a majority of the hardcore conspiracy idiots claim that if you don't agree 100% with their idea of what happen, you are a slave to tv. Matty, stop being a slave to infowars, we don't have to believe either you or the 9/11 report. The fact is that the full back story is still an enigma and when you polarize yourself (like you have done in this thread), you set yourself on the same level as Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or whoever else wants you to swallow the official report. Get over yourself.
 

Teddy Roosevelt

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7537
  • Karma: 179
  • The Trust-Buster
I like how a majority of the hardcore conspiracy idiots claim that if you don't agree 100% with their idea of what happen, you are a slave to tv. Matty, stop being a slave to infowars, we don't have to believe either you or the 9/11 report. The fact is that the full back story is still an enigma and when you polarize yourself (like you have done in this thread), you set yourself on the same level as Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or whoever else wants you to swallow the official report. Get over yourself.
Truth.
 

Matty

I like how a majority of the hardcore conspiracy idiots claim that if you don't agree 100% with their idea of what happen, you are a slave to tv. Matty, stop being a slave to infowars, we don't have to believe either you or the 9/11 report. The fact is that the full back story is still an enigma and when you polarize yourself (like you have done in this thread), you set yourself on the same level as Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or whoever else wants you to swallow the official report. Get over yourself.

hardcore conspiracy idiot? all i did was state it was an inside job. you don't have to agree, but when people instantly disregard something that suggests otherwise and lump everyone on that side of the debate into the same category, its just as silly.

virtuoso

  • Shot Caller
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3048
  • Karma: 332
Re: Charlie Sheen demands Obama investigate 9/11; says it was masterminded by Bu
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2009, 03:51:42 AM »
History is littered with fake terrorist events, so we know that conspiracies have been pulled off before. How did they get away with it for so long? well you would have to ask them, we only know about it because of the declassification of internal documents. They only declassify when any impact the event might have had has now been nullified and so we dismiss it as not being relevant to the present. However of course a pattern of evens is relevant, since history repeats itself.

We know that on the day for instance a series of war games were going on, now as soon as we establish that some of those war games were not privy to the general public, then we can identify that that day was chosen because of the vulnerabilities of the air force to such a hijacking. This would have then totally thrown NORAD who wouldn't have been able to identify which was real world and which was not. As a result a mass of blimps, but the secrecy of the war games is key to this and it would be reasonable to assume that not all the war games were for public consumption.

We know for instance that the CIA were running war games that today for the scenario and exercise of jets flying into the world trade centre and yet condoleeza rice swore before the commission, that they could never have forseen that planes would be used as weapons. This is rather odd since during the G8 meeting held in Greece (i believe it was) anti aircraft guns were deployed by the building which would stage the meeting for that very threat.

It is reasonable to assume that the pentagon being a key part of americas infrastructure, would have air defences and yet curiously, not one was deployed, it would also be reasonable to assume that being such a key part of their military machine, that cameras would have clearly picked up the images of the impact, but yet they didn't

According to official sources, after the impact of the planes had brought down the towers, the towers were not just burning they were smouldering hot which is understandable and yet they managed to retrieve a passport which was only lightly caught and this passport just happened to be of one of the supposed hijackers.

We also see the collapse of building 7, which is now insisted that it came down as a result of fires caused by flying debris. However once again, this just happened to be a building which wasn't hit by any plane, and housed the key intelligence agencies. What we know about this building is it housed many damning documents on Enron and of course when you looked into the scale and corruption at Enron, and their close ties with the republicans, it clearly implicated them to.

We know that the the logistics and deployment of troops at such a large scale would have taken months to come to fruition and that would have been after the initial investigation. However when have you ever seen any large scale investigation which reaches a conclusion within 24 hours "it was bin laden", secondly the troops were already mounted on the Tajikistan and Uzbekhistan border, waiting to atttack.

We know that Rebuilding Americas Defences called for a pearl harbour type event of event which would galvanise the world into calling for action across the middle east.

We also know that trading options were rampant that day across the airlines who were at the centre of this day and yet,, the 911 commission report simply provided a small foot note which said words to the effect of we don't see anything suspicious here, so case closed. Does that sound to you like a real investigation? What we also know about the 911 comission is they were compromised of members of the very globalist bodies whose interest this "war on terrorism has served".

We also know that a month after September 11, a new fear gripped the nation after a spate of anthrax attacks across Washington. Initially the fear was that this was a new wave of "Al Queda attacks" and yet when the anthrax itself was analysed, they identified that because of the expertise needed to make anthrax into a genuinely dangerous weapon, each one has it's own signature. They traced this signature back to the military labs, in other words it was an inside job, yet the official response was this was the work of one scorned scientist.

We saw that in the immediate aftermath all flights were grounded, all except the Bin Laden family, who after a supposedly short questioning, were given special treatment and a plane was chartered, waving aside the fact that all commercial and private planes were grounded, and thus they were allowed to leave the country. Why was it so imperative that a special rule be in place for them? why was the questioning of his own family such a short one?

Bill Cooper warned in advance of September 11, that a huge manufactured terrorist event was going to be engineered and they were going to use Bin Laden as their scapegoat. He cited the fact that a CNN journalist had recently been to see Bin Laden, while officially the american intelligence services said they could not find Bin Laden anywhere, so a journalist can find him, but not the combined resource of the multi trillion dollar intelligence services? Then of course we have this Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.

The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.   http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/nov/01/afghanistan.terrorism

So lets get this straight Figaro reported that he got treated at a American Hospital, when this was a wanted man for his alleged actions in Kenia and Tanzania bombings, several other newspapers reported from doctors who had recently treated him prior to that, we have the naming of the CIA agent who it is said visited him and yet he was one of the most wanted men on the planet? Then of course since this has been repeated time and time again, that he needed dialysis and was in fact an extremely weakened man, how it is that since 911, they still can't find him. Clearly this would indicate that they know where he is and have done all along.

These are only a few of the points and yet they clearly cast extreme doubt on the official story and clearly any detective will recognise and accept only so many coincidences as independently existing, before questioning if these coincidences are interwoven. However in this case they have made the conclusion stick rigidly to the hypothesis and simply cast away any lingering doubts by calling this incompetency. However ask yourself how can it be that incompetency hasn't been followed with sackings and criminal action and has instead led to promotions for those whose departments were deemed so "incompetent".

I agree, that there are elements of interpretation and that you don't need to agree with everything and no doubt there are some manufactured crap which serves as a distraction and muddy's the waters, but I think most people realise by now, that this amounts to one of 3 things either criminal negligence, in which case why are so many being rewarded for it? which implies approval at their actions, accomplices to mass murder, or not just allowing it to happen but organising and orchestrating every aspect of this and using some arabs as their willing or unwilling patsies.

Therefore it doesn't matter if Charlie Sheen is a a lunatic, it wouldn't matter if this guy was a scitzophrenic, because the questions speak for themselves, the events of that day speak for themselves.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2009, 09:54:09 AM by virtuoso »
 

Primo

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2610
  • Karma: 46
  • I just want to fit in!
Re: Charlie Sheen demands Obama investigate 9/11; says it was masterminded by Bu
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2009, 01:56:32 PM »
Its called false flag terrorism.