Poll

Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?

Yes
No
Undecided
I Hate Dre
I Hate Nate Dogg
  

Author Topic: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?  (Read 4619 times)

MOON KNIGHT

Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« on: December 27, 2010, 10:50:59 PM »
Serious question...

The poor mans in a coma & Dre thinks it's a good look to emulate Nate Dogg on his new song  ???
I mean... at least Dre should make some contribution to The Nate Dogg Fund. Which is doubtful, as Warren G has to make Youtube videos asking for moolah. If Snoop was out of commission would it have been accepted to have some "fugazi Snoop" such as Top Dogg appear on his track ? If you use someone else's style don't they deserve a shoutout or "Get Well" ?
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25867
  • Thanked: 29 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2010, 10:55:51 PM »
Not disrespectful.

Dre is trying to make an album, has a lead single, he can't be shouting out people on it.

If anything, it was in honor of Nate.

& you wouldn't see a fake Snoop do an entire verse like Snoop, unless it was Dre doing one of those imitation verses like Game on "Never Say Goodbye".
 

MOON KNIGHT

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2010, 10:58:14 PM »

Surely his name could have been dropped in one of the verses.  ;)
If indeed it was in honor of Nate.
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25867
  • Thanked: 29 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2010, 11:02:33 PM »

Surely his name could have been dropped in one of the verses.  ;)
If indeed it was in honor of Nate.

I meant it in a more subliminal way. Knowing todays group of kids, they probably don't even know who Nate Dogg is lol.

I wouldn't be surprised if he gives Nate love on at least one bar on all of Detox. :P
 

MOON KNIGHT

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2010, 11:04:54 PM »

Surely his name could have been dropped in one of the verses.  ;)
If indeed it was in honor of Nate.

I meant it in a more subliminal way. Knowing todays group of kids, they probably don't even know who Nate Dogg is lol.

I wouldn't be surprised if he gives Nate love on at least one bar on all of Detox. :P

I hope so... or cut him a check  :laugh:
 

Nooc210

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1023
  • Karma: 65
  • The Planets
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2010, 11:31:33 PM »
if ANYTHING it's a HUGE honor & a respectful way of paying homage to a west-coast icon that otherwise couldn't perform himself.
anyone thinking of or pandering to the contrary is a "Bitch Nigga"... 8)

BIGWORM

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1554
  • Thanked: 22 times
  • Karma: 45
  • YOU SMOKIN MY SHIT SMOKEY
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2010, 12:15:19 AM »
TOTAL BITCH MOVE...

At least throw him a shout out or a pic or something.


The West Coast Lost Alot Of Flavour When Nate Had Those Strokes....
 

love33

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: -82
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2010, 12:18:23 AM »
Not disrespectful. Rap is all about imitation and duplication, taking someone else's idea and expanding on it -- that's how slang gets spread around and rap is full of sampling tracks from the past.

First comes Nate Dogg then Akon, Trey Songz, T-Pain, and now Drake has the throne and before Nate it was Marvin Gaye.  One thing about rap is it's funny how people think they can't be replaced just go drive by the cemetary.
 

dameons

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2010, 12:22:27 AM »
It's a compliment to Nate's signature sound . He is one of Dre's usual suspects . Dre needs Nate or he is not doing Dre music . I bet Nate knows what's up .
 

MrJas

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1119
  • Karma: -138
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2010, 01:02:04 AM »
Do you want to wait longer for Detox to come out? I'm sure dre could have waited for Nate to get better.

Smh at people thinking it's disrespect, Dre was basically paying homage
You expect me to download an album that isn't real?  Sorry, but I can't sign this.
 

ruthless95rip

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 416
  • Karma: 42
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2010, 01:06:41 AM »
Im not a big fan of Nate Dogg but i do think its kinda messed up they had that guy imitating him.

 

Portugoal

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2010, 01:24:41 AM »
Of course it's not disrespectful... If Dre wanted to disrespect Nate Dogg he would've dissed him, lol.

What would be the point of raising funds for Nate Dogg? The man's living like a plant, not a dime is gonna change that.
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10961
  • Karma: 2195
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2010, 03:15:05 AM »
yeah i think it's disrespectful.

you can't diss ja rule for imitating 2pac, when you put a nate dogg imitator on your single.
not to mention that sly didn't give props to nate dogg

Mista Rosa

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2010, 04:05:21 AM »
Do you want to wait longer for Detox to come out? I'm sure dre could have waited for Nate to get better.

Smh at people thinking it's disrespect, Dre was basically paying homage

Nate had 2 strokes, it's sad to say but he probably would never sing, live a normal life again. I mean let's be realistic, he had his last stroke 2 years ago and he still can't talk, move his arms and legs.
A Dre album without Nate is gonna be weird. But Dre could have used old vocals, but i don't think that's Dre's method.

I don't think it's disrespectful, but i hope they'll give him a shout out in another song or in the booklet..

What was really FUCKED UP was the "underdog" song, labeled and promoted as a Nate Dogg one, when it was obvious that fans would recognize that it wasn't Nate! That was DISRESPECTFUL!!
« Last Edit: December 28, 2010, 05:17:00 AM by mista rosa »
"There's one more thing I'd really like for you to do, never leave me alone..."
 

Davizz

  • Muthafuckin' Double OG
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 732
  • Karma: 5
  • Keep It Fonky
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2010, 04:20:29 AM »
It's like having Realest saying "Hennessey.... enemiesss", I think it was hella disrespectful but at the same time... THE BEST PART OF THE SONG.
 

MY FIRST LOVE WAS HIP HOP

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: 2
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2010, 04:52:26 AM »
in my opinion, yes, it was disrespectful. At least give the man a shout out..
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2010, 04:59:38 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
 

No Compute

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2251
  • Karma: 231
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2010, 05:09:53 AM »
Yeah it was and the album title should be changed to "Detox - An Album Dedicated to Nate Dogg". ::)
 

HighEyeCue

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2010, 05:11:15 AM »
in my opinion, yes, it was disrespectful. At least give the man a shout out..
 

awol22222

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 904
  • Karma: 70
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2010, 05:11:20 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.
 

Fonkarround

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1276
  • Karma: 61
  • https://soundcloud.com/fonkarround
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2010, 06:03:47 AM »
Thats just bitchin.. grow up

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2010, 06:32:04 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.

Doesn't change the fact that Dre is a homesexual devil worshipper.
 

MrJas

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1119
  • Karma: -138
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2010, 06:45:52 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.

Doesn't change the fact that Dre is a homesexual devil worshipper.

I want what you're smoking bro
You expect me to download an album that isn't real?  Sorry, but I can't sign this.
 

Nooc210

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1023
  • Karma: 65
  • The Planets
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2010, 09:00:46 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.

Doesn't change the fact that Dre is a homesexual :firedevil: worshipper.
  :loco:

it's amazing how lemming-people cling so ignorantly to hear-say & asinine horse-shit rumors when there's never any hard-proof or facts that would be necessary to enable the right or appropriate reasonable frame-of-mind or conviction to really say something like that & mean it genuinely w/o truly knowing for yourself, surely, first-hand to actually determine or discern weather or not shit like that could possibly be true. people like you just like to bring attention to themselves because life for you isn't interesting or creative enough on your own w/o lies & confusion. in essence The Illuminati has a better chance of existing in the way that most people want to believe it does, than Dre being an actual practicing homo-sexual Satanist is. first of all he has a wife & a LOT of kids w/ her not to mention all his MANY other children born out of wed-lock, so right there your claims of homo-sexuality immediately fall apart... ::)

and the only "god" or symbol that Dre would pray or worship to would be THE Almighty $ (DOLLAR)  sign.
after all he AIN'T TRYIN' TO STICK AROUND FOR ILLUMINATI  :monkey_dance2::raisetheroof: :monkey:

Portugoal

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2010, 09:28:43 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.

Doesn't change the fact that Dre is a homesexual :firedevil: worshipper.
  :loco:

it's amazing how lemming-people cling so ignorantly to hear-say & asinine horse-shit rumors when there's never any hard-proof or facts that would be necessary to enable the right or appropriate reasonable frame-of-mind or conviction to really say something like that & mean it genuinely w/o truly knowing for yourself, surely, first-hand to actually determine or discern weather or not shit like that could possibly be true. people like you just like to bring attention to themselves because life for you isn't interesting or creative enough on your own w/o lies & confusion. in essence The Illuminati has a better chance of existing in the way that most people want to believe it does, than Dre being an actual practicing homo-sexual Satanist is. first of all he has a wife & a LOT of kids w/ her not to mention all his MANY other children born out of wed-lock, so right there your claims of homo-sexuality immediately fall apart... ::)

and the only "god" or symbol that Dre would pray or worship to would be THE Almighty $ (DOLLAR)  sign.
after all he AIN'T TRYIN' TO STICK AROUND FOR ILLUMINATI  :monkey_dance2::raisetheroof: :monkey:

hahahahhahahahhaha