It's April 19, 2024, 10:12:44 AM
TOTAL BITCH MOVE...At least throw him a shout out or a pic or something. The West Coast Lost Alot Of Flavour When Nate Had Those Strokes....
Quote from: Jrome The Don Killuminati on March 17, 2011, 02:49:06 PMNo offense to anyone in here, but you're an idiot if you don't see it as disrespect. And some of yall making excuses "it was a tribute" make you look like a Dre groupie. There was no tribute whatsoever. Dre knew Nate was not available, so he purposely got someone (who the fuck was it anyway?) and tried to duplicate Nate's voice. If you don't see that, you need to pull your head out of your ass.And really, Snoop is just as big a bitch if not more for going along with it too. That's supposed to be his childhood friend. I promise if Dre and Nate would have done a lead single with Top Dogg for Detox, people would be like "wtf" and wouldn't be looking at it as a tribute lmao.Some of yall are in serious denial trying to defend this.Disrespectful to who? Maybe you have some inside info that nobody else has, but I would think it would be odd to catch feelings over something like whether another artist on a Dre song sounded like someone else (that wasn't available and couldn't have done the song anyways).Based on Dre's previous dealings with Nate Dogg, it didn't appear that the two had any reason to beef with each other. Nate remained cool with Dre throughout the years and even appeared on albums after Dre left Death Row. Dre produced songs for Nate's solo albums and even appeared on songs (which he doesn't do very often).Because you claim not to be an idiot regarding the situation, please enlighten us as to the situation between Dre, Snoop and Nate at the time Kush was recorded and why Dre was trying to be disrespectful to Nate.
No offense to anyone in here, but you're an idiot if you don't see it as disrespect. And some of yall making excuses "it was a tribute" make you look like a Dre groupie. There was no tribute whatsoever. Dre knew Nate was not available, so he purposely got someone (who the fuck was it anyway?) and tried to duplicate Nate's voice. If you don't see that, you need to pull your head out of your ass.And really, Snoop is just as big a bitch if not more for going along with it too. That's supposed to be his childhood friend. I promise if Dre and Nate would have done a lead single with Top Dogg for Detox, people would be like "wtf" and wouldn't be looking at it as a tribute lmao.Some of yall are in serious denial trying to defend this.
Quote from: MY FIRST LOVE WAS HIP HOP on December 28, 2010, 03:52:26 AMin my opinion, yes, it was disrespectful. At least give the man a shout out..
in my opinion, yes, it was disrespectful. At least give the man a shout out..
I see a bunch of hypocritical opinions here.People be shitting on dudes like Tha Realest, Top Dogg and others for sounding like 2Pac, Snoop etc. Yet, when Dre brings a "Nate Dogg sound-alike" on his new track it is ok and none of them cats seems to have a problem with it, lol
Disrespectful to who? Maybe you have some inside info that nobody else has, but I would think it would be odd to catch feelings over something like whether another artist on a Dre song sounded like someone else (that wasn't available and couldn't have done the song anyways).Based on Dre's previous dealings with Nate Dogg, it didn't appear that the two had any reason to beef with each other. Nate remained cool with Dre throughout the years and even appeared on albums after Dre left Death Row. Dre produced songs for Nate's solo albums and even appeared on songs (which he doesn't do very often).Because you claim not to be an idiot regarding the situation, please enlighten us as to the situation between Dre, Snoop and Nate at the time Kush was recorded and why Dre was trying to be disrespectful to Nate.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Poll
Print
