Author Topic: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?  (Read 933 times)

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 12116
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2012, 02:28:50 PM »

I have never ventured into this before, but obviously one of the main reasons it hasn't been greatly explored is because unlike other events it has 2 things which diminish it's interest for people, firstly, unlike other conspiracy's like 911 it wasn't used as a catalyst for war and secondly, it prior to 1900. Therefore most people see no significance with it either but since I know nothing about this, then for now I really can't comment.

I agree that it's timing would make hard to look at for people, though it happened in 1912, not before 1900. But the thing is that even then we had conspiracy theories. People were very suspect on the overthrow of Hawaii for instance, which was 1894, The Tuskegee Experiment was a conspiracy theory as in the 1930's doctors gave African Americans syphilis to experiment for curses. These were all conspiracy theories that were proven right over time, and now are part of history, though back then they were only conspiracy theories. No one ever mentioned the Titanic as a conspiracy theory.
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2012, 03:37:05 PM »
If you could prove that these highly wealthy people, planning to try to put a stop to the creation of the Federal Reserve, I'd believe it. Otherwise, it's just some nonsense.
 

V2DHeart

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2012, 05:23:35 PM »
It's out there. Also, the author to that book (wreck of the Titan - which is almost identical to Titanic) was found dead in a hotel room with a drugs overdose a couple of years after the Titanic sank.

The whole thing is just fishy (no pun intended)
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/JWTNFUWa1PM" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/JWTNFUWa1PM</a> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/eE_ov9cPKxE" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/eE_ov9cPKxE</a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/53dftjKPTvU" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/53dftjKPTvU</a>
 

MistaNova

  • Guest
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2012, 05:45:34 PM »
Hmmm, I forgot that it's been 100 years since the Titanic sank.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2012, 06:14:33 PM »
First great false flag of the 20th century. Lots of extremely important people died on "the unsinkable ship", and yes they were opponents of the federal reserve. There was no other captain in the world better acquainted with the route the titanic took than it's captain. He knew the waters like the back of his hand. They used the wrong color signal flares which signaled they were ok, rather than SOS, not even remotely enough life boats, and the kicker being that it likely wasn't the titanic that sank, but a different boat all together.

Yeah and I know it sucks to think that this is a conspiracy...I got news for ya, these things go back hundreds of years earlier, hate to burst your bubble.
 

MUHFUKKA

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #20 on: April 19, 2012, 06:42:56 PM »
i knew the jews were behind it!! then the jewish media made a blockbuster movie about it to brainwash the public and generate money to fund their zionist organized government. im on to them

The blood gang embraces Tupac as a member even if YOU dont.
 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #21 on: April 19, 2012, 09:11:51 PM »
i knew the jews were behind it!! then the jewish media made a blockbuster movie about it to brainwash the public and generate money to fund their zionist organized government. im on to them

The blockbuster movie is an integral part of the brainwashing of the masses to the official story.
 

Darkwing Duck (The Reincarnation)

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2012, 09:34:07 PM »
John Jacob Astor VI, one of the 3 powerful passengers set to go against the Federal Reserve who died on the Titanic, was said to have an estate over $100 million, which in todays money would be worth over $2,461,367,055.00.. You also have to take into account that over 90% decline of the purchasing power of the dollar today as well so back in 1900, over $100 million was mammoth. His father also had numerous trust funds, and accounts with many millions as well.. The Astor family were very high up. These 3 below had to be stopped in order for the Federal Reserve to go ahead. All 3 were probably thee richest on board, yet all died despite plenty of other 1st class men surviving.




This other man also had to be stopped (or put out of power) The current US President at the time:



As soon as his presidency term was up, and Woodrow Wilson became president, a man who the three men above did not want into power - and was subsequently use their wealth and power to ensure he wouldn't, went on to pass the Federal Reserve act, and Federal Trade act. From there on out, only one man with enough power to change has attempted to oppose the Federal Reserve:



People think the Titanic theory of the Federal Reserve being behind it ludicrous, but it's the most believable and rational explanation than the official reason, or any other one out there




why did u type all this?

conspiracy theories etc
why do u care so much about somethin taht happend a 100 years ago..?
i dont understand
« Last Edit: April 19, 2012, 09:55:05 PM by Michael Madsen (Der Führer des Dritten Reichs) »


 

jeromechickenbone

  • Guest
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2012, 12:54:35 PM »
John Jacob Astor VI, one of the 3 powerful passengers set to go against the Federal Reserve who died on the Titanic, was said to have an estate over $100 million, which in todays money would be worth over $2,461,367,055.00.. You also have to take into account that over 90% decline of the purchasing power of the dollar today as well so back in 1900, over $100 million was mammoth. His father also had numerous trust funds, and accounts with many millions as well.. The Astor family were very high up. These 3 below had to be stopped in order for the Federal Reserve to go ahead. All 3 were probably thee richest on board, yet all died despite plenty of other 1st class men surviving.




This other man also had to be stopped (or put out of power) The current US President at the time:



As soon as his presidency term was up, and Woodrow Wilson became president, a man who the three men above did not want into power - and was subsequently use their wealth and power to ensure he wouldn't, went on to pass the Federal Reserve act, and Federal Trade act. From there on out, only one man with enough power to change has attempted to oppose the Federal Reserve:



People think the Titanic theory of the Federal Reserve being behind it ludicrous, but it's the most believable and rational explanation than the official reason, or any other one out there




why did u type all this?

conspiracy theories etc
why do u care so much about somethin taht happend a 100 years ago..?
i dont understand

You have much to learn grasshopper.
 

Darkwing Duck (The Reincarnation)

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2012, 01:03:08 PM »
"Titanic" was a good movie, i like teh scenes wit Leo & Kate, so romantic


 

V2DHeart

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #25 on: April 26, 2012, 12:06:14 PM »
"Titanic" was a good movie, i like teh scenes wit Leo & Kate, so romantic

Romantic indeed. Crying a lot at the end?  :D

Another interesting fact about the Titanic was that J.P Morgan owned the company that owned White Star Line IE: the company behind the Titanic, and he refused to set sail on the ship. It was built as a tomb for those 3 people

I don't know why they haven't rebuilt a similar ship in this day and age with the available blue prints and designs. It would make a killing
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/JWTNFUWa1PM" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/JWTNFUWa1PM</a> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/eE_ov9cPKxE" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/eE_ov9cPKxE</a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/53dftjKPTvU" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/53dftjKPTvU</a>
 

LIGHTS_444

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: -13
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2012, 05:44:32 PM »
very interesting post....

L.A.M.B!
 

Darkwing Duck (The Reincarnation)

Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2012, 10:17:13 PM »
"Titanic" was a good movie, i like teh scenes wit Leo & Kate, so romantic

Romantic indeed. Crying a lot at the end?  :D


first time i watched it, i think i did


 

LIGHTS_444

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: -13
Re: Titanic: sunk or bombed by banking cartel?
« Reply #28 on: June 18, 2012, 10:11:51 AM »
awww

L.A.M.B!