Author Topic: Krazysumwhat  (Read 562 times)

MUHFUKKA

Krazysumwhat
« on: January 14, 2015, 05:38:08 PM »
i heard someone talking about how it was illegal to draw certain things and looked it up. its pretty crazy regarding our favorite australian pedo and the cartoons he posted here
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A



(a) In General.— Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A (b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(b) Additional Offenses.— Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and

(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A (b)(2), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(c) Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.
(d) Circumstances.— The circumstance referred to in subsections (a) and (b) is that—
(1) any communication involved in or made in furtherance of the offense is communicated or transported by the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or any means or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce is otherwise used in committing or in furtherance of the commission of the offense;
(2) any communication involved in or made in furtherance of the offense contemplates the transmission or transportation of a visual depiction by the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
(3) any person travels or is transported in interstate or foreign commerce in the course of the commission or in furtherance of the commission of the offense;
(4) any visual depiction involved in the offense has been mailed, or has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or was produced using materials that have been mailed, or that have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
(5) the offense is committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in any territory or possession of the United States.
(e) Affirmative Defense.— It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (b) that the defendant—
(1) possessed less than 3 such visual depictions; and
(2) promptly and in good faith, and without retaining or allowing any person, other than a law enforcement agency, to access any such visual depiction—
(A) took reasonable steps to destroy each such visual depiction; or
(B) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such visual depiction.
(f) Definitions.— For purposes of this section—
(1) the term “visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, and data stored on a computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image, and also includes any photograph, film, video, picture, digital image or picture, computer image or picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means;
(2) the term “sexually explicit conduct” has the meaning given the term in section 2256 (2)(A) or 2256 (2)(B); and
(3) the term “graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted.


i dont think mdogg is the only one of us who has looked at child porn cuz of krazy  :-X :o

The blood gang embraces Tupac as a member even if YOU dont.
 

Sccit

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2015, 08:16:18 PM »
mdogg would make a good detective tho .. would probably suck someone off to prove they're gay. true soldier.

Jack Trippa 3z company ho

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2015, 12:10:41 PM »
mdogg would make a good detective tho .. would probably suck someone off to prove they're gay. true soldier.

Lol damn sneak diss outta no where.

Although he did say michelle O was hot when she's a known tranny.
 

Sccit

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2015, 12:13:58 PM »
JUST FUCKIN AROUND....MDOGG'S MY FICCA

O.G A.Geesta'z

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2015, 01:59:15 AM »
Krazysumwhat and Bez are actually cousins; Krazy likes to be pedo towards little girls and Bez likes little boys, I've already accepted who they are even if i dont agree with it
but Krazy shouldnt be banned for life
The West is Back

 

Sccit

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2015, 12:31:19 PM »
Krazysumwhat and Bez are actually cousins; Krazy likes to be pedo towards little girls and Bez likes little boys, I've already accepted who they are even if i dont agree with it
but Krazy shouldnt be banned for life


he wasnt banned, petey and heinz ran him off the site

Jack Trippa 3z company ho

Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2015, 12:35:03 PM »
That guy had issues. He played the victim for being called out on his sick crap.

I hope he has improved himself and not delved any deeper into his perversions.

God bless him.
 

Remedy360

  • Guest
Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2015, 10:04:07 PM »
That guy had issues. He played the victim for being called out on his sick crap.

I hope he has improved himself and not delved any deeper into his perversions.

God bless him.

Yeah, nothing's more annoying than someone who clearly has issues acting like it's everyone elses fault.
 

Heinz

  • Guest
Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2015, 12:16:22 PM »

he wasnt banned, petey and heinz ran him off the site

Life as an untermensch shouldn't be so rough...

 

Sir Petey

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7634
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Karma: 714
  • ♛ bitch I'm flawless ♛
Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2015, 09:08:46 PM »

he wasnt banned, petey and heinz ran him off the site

Life as an untermensch shouldn't be so rough...




fuck that guy. hes a bad look for humanity.

Rick Venom

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 209
  • Karma: 19
  • WuTz GoOd NiGgA?
Re: Krazysumwhat
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2015, 08:28:20 PM »
kraxy n m fraud should share a cell togetha once somebody bust they asses for all the pedo shit they done. not surprised about marty bein a perv since he be teachin kids n shit. how many of them poor kids you diddle on the side? we know nobody wanna stick anyhting in yo fat wife except maybe a knife.
show me where did i said i live in Poland
want me to show u? ok.....

ICHI, WHAT COUNTRY U FROM?
im from Poland
LOL!