Author Topic: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop  (Read 2342 times)

King of tha Cripz 661

  • Guest
New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« on: November 11, 2016, 07:12:16 AM »
No factual information here. Snoop is trash now and 213 without Snoop was rumored previously. Tray and Loc Eastsidazzzzz album would b tha chief.
 

b-PlEaSE

  • Muthafuckin' Double OG
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • Karma: 17
Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2016, 09:08:07 AM »
No factual information here. Snoop is trash now and 213 without Snoop was rumored previously. Tray and Loc Eastsidazzzzz album would b tha chief.

213 without Snoop is uhhh, Warren G? LOL.... ::)
 

On tha blocc 661

  • Guest
Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2016, 11:35:33 AM »
No factual information here. Snoop is trash now and 213 without Snoop was rumored previously. Tray and Loc Eastsidazzzzz album would b tha chief.

213 without Snoop is uhhh, Warren G? LOL.... ::)

This was rumored obviously when Nate was alive. Not since.
 

dexter

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2016, 12:43:42 PM »
snoop is not trash
 

doggfather

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2016, 01:05:40 AM »
could be, but goldie aint want it.
https://twitter.com/dggfthr

HELP

I'm an ol' school collecta from the 90's SO F.CK DIGITAL, RELEASE A CD!

RIP GANXSTA RIDD
RIP GODFATHER
RIP MONSTA O
RIP NATE DOGG
RIP BAD AZZ
 

heisenberg

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2016, 03:08:36 AM »
No factual information here. Snoop is trash now and 213 without Snoop was rumored previously. Tray and Loc Eastsidazzzzz album would b tha chief.

213 without Snoop is uhhh, Warren G? LOL.... ::)

This was rumored obviously when Nate was alive. Not since.

It was not about 213 but regulate.
 

SuperSpider

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2016, 06:05:42 AM »
If this was any year pre-2007 this would've been a terrible loss, but nowadays?... who's trying to listen to what Snoop has to say in 2016 anyway
 

On tha blocc 661

  • Guest
Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2016, 09:32:18 AM »
could be, but goldie aint want it.

Track 14 sayz he will but not if Snup is involving.
 

On tha blocc 661

  • Guest
Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2016, 09:32:59 AM »
No factual information here. Snoop is trash now and 213 without Snoop was rumored previously. Tray and Loc Eastsidazzzzz album would b tha chief.

213 without Snoop is uhhh, Warren G? LOL.... ::)

This was rumored obviously when Nate was alive. Not since.

It was not about 213 but regulate.

It was 213 also after the album dropped.
 

Okka

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2016, 05:29:20 PM »
Tray Deee said that the album ain't happenin'.
 

Okka

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2016, 07:40:58 AM »
Tray Deee said that the album ain't happenin'.

Link? Money changes everything.

Well, Goldie Loc is making money in the weed business and that's what he's focusing on, so they're not workin' on the album, even though they are still performing together. That's what Tray Deee said in some interview.
 

Sccit

Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2019, 11:22:53 AM »
wassup wit a new eastsidaz?

On tha blocc 661

  • Guest
Re: New Eastsidaz could be minus Snoop
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2019, 02:17:05 PM »
wassup wit a new eastsidaz?

Sccif no's nuttin