Author Topic: Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source  (Read 427 times)

mauzip

  • Guest
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2003, 11:29:18 AM »
i'm surprised it's that high. that album is worth shit. :-X
 

Gotti......Xl

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2012
  • Karma: 160
  • Thug Life
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2003, 05:16:17 PM »
fuck the source

 

BigCain

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 93
  • Karma: 10
  • Dr. Stank & Dirdy Birdy
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2003, 09:59:56 PM »
I agree on the score.. but by The Sources standard, Roscoe would have gotten 4.5 if he was from N.Y.

Couldn't of said it better myself....
"Sittin thinkin how bein poor sucks,
drivin around lookin for a fasho fuck,
only workin wit 4 bucs,
all my babies older than each other by 4 months"
By Dirdy Birdy on the Black Spooks song "Understand My Plight"  Black Spooks are Sly Boogy & Dirty Birdy


"It is sort of fascinating that you can have 100 percent certainty about weapons of mass destruction and zero certainty of about where they are" Head United Nations Inspector Hans Blix
 

OpTiCaL

  • Cool As Ice Cube
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3041
  • Karma: 660
  • The DoN MeGa
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2003, 01:24:06 AM »
the source sucks. they hate too much.
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2003, 01:47:12 AM »
The Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating. What's funny is that some of these people will be bitching at The Source no matter what, I bet if Roscoe got 5 mics people would still complain, LOL.
 

Halu Sination

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
  • Karma: -35
  • Halu Sination
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2003, 02:00:22 AM »
i'm not saying it deserved 5 mics or anything, but on the source's standards, it most definitely deserves a higher score.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2003, 02:00:36 AM by Krayzie Mofo Guy »
 

The Big Bad Ass

Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2003, 02:37:44 AM »
Man, thats fucking bullshit. I felt this album was solid from start to finish. The fact that he got less than 4 mics even further solidifies my hate of the source.
 

Lord Funk

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2710
  • Karma: 462
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2003, 02:46:30 AM »
The Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating.

Agreed. It's a good, solid album, but it's nothing groundbreaking whatsoever. There's not a song on there I don't like, but at the same time there's not a song on there that I couldn't find elsewhere. 3.5 is just right.
"I fornicate with porn stars, sluts and strippers.
 Well - only on the Internet but what's the difference?"

 - Mad Child from Swollen Members, 'Adrenaline'
 

Halu Sination

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
  • Karma: -35
  • Halu Sination
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2003, 02:49:51 AM »
The Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating.

Agreed. It's a good, solid album, but it's nothing groundbreaking whatsoever. There's not a song on there I don't like, but at the same time there's not a song on there that I couldn't find elsewhere. 3.5 is just right.

i think you're missing the point of our argument. everybody and their mamas know that the source would've had a much more generous review had roscoe been from ny. a solid album doesn't receive a 3.5 from the source. like eminem said "3 and half which means you a piece of shit"
 

Lord Funk

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2710
  • Karma: 462
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2003, 02:54:47 AM »
The Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating.

Agreed. It's a good, solid album, but it's nothing groundbreaking whatsoever. There's not a song on there I don't like, but at the same time there's not a song on there that I couldn't find elsewhere. 3.5 is just right.

i think you're missing the point of our argument. everybody and their mamas know that the source would've had a much more generous review had roscoe been from ny. a solid album doesn't receive a 3.5 from the source. like eminem said "3 and half which means you a piece of shit"

I see what you're sayin', but I'm not sure I agree. Besides, as much as I side with Em in the Aftermath vs The Sauce shit, I'm not sure you can take Em's highly subjective take on the magazine's rating system to be representative of every album they feature.
"I fornicate with porn stars, sluts and strippers.
 Well - only on the Internet but what's the difference?"

 - Mad Child from Swollen Members, 'Adrenaline'
 

R-Tistic

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4466
  • Karma: 451
  • DJ R-Tistic....L.A.'s Favorite
Re:Young Roscoe Gets A 3.5 From The Source
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2003, 06:44:29 PM »
I woulda gave it a 3.5....nothin higher than 4 nothin lower than 3. It ain't anything special, it has some coo summer tracks but like 5 songs on there were already played out on radio or either released on the net a year or two ago. They are on point with the review, but if the ONLY reason they gave it that "low" is because he sounds like Kurupt then they are dumb.
Some of their reviews are on point...but some are waaaaaay off, and it's usually the best ones that are way off.