Author Topic: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan?  (Read 489 times)

infinite59

  • Guest
Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan?
« on: September 24, 2002, 10:05:26 PM »
Engle-rock and Jacob say George Bush.

I say Farakkan.

What do ya'll think.

LOL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4329
  • Karma: 158
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2002, 10:14:00 PM »
Quote


LOL

First I don't find anything funny about poverty.

Second:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020322-1.html

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. We meet at a moment of new hope and age-old struggle, the battle against world poverty. I'm honored to be with so many distinguished leaders who are committed to this cause. I'm here today to reaffirm the commitment of the United States to bring hope and opportunity to the world's poorest people, and to call for a new compact for development defined by greater accountability for rich and poor nations, alike.

I want to thank Vicente Fox, el Presidente de Mexico, and the people of Monterrey for such grand hospitality. I want to thank Kofi Annan for his steadfast leadership. And I want to thank the distinguished leaders who are here for your hospitality, as well.

Many here today have devoted their lives to the fight against global poverty, and you know the stakes. We fight against poverty because hope is an answer to terror. We fight against poverty because opportunity is a fundamental right to human dignity. We fight against poverty because faith requires it and conscience demands it. And we fight against poverty with a growing conviction that major progress is within our reach.

Yet, this progress will require change. For decades, the success of development aid was measured only in the resources spent, not the results achieved. Yet, pouring money into a failed status quo does little to help the poor, and can actually delay the progress of reform. We must accept a higher, more difficult, more promising call. Developed nations have a duty not only to share our wealth, but also to encourage sources that produce wealth: economic freedom, political liberty, the rule of law and human rights.

The lesson of our time is clear: When nations close their markets and opportunity is horded by a privileged few, no amount -- no amount -- of development aid is ever enough. When nations respect their people, open markets, invest in better health and education, every dollar of aid, every dollar of trade revenue and domestic capital is used more effectively.

We must tie greater aid to political and legal and economic reforms. And by insisting on reform, we do the work of compassion. The United States will lead by example. I have proposed a 50-percent increase in our core development assistance over the next three budget years. Eventually, this will mean a $5-billion annual increase over current levels.

These new funds will go into a new Millennium Challenge Account, devoted to projects in nations that govern justly, invest in their people and encourage economic freedom. We will promote development from the bottom up, helping citizens find the tools and training and technologies to seize the opportunities of the global economy.

I've asked Secretary of State Powell, Secretary of Treasury O'Neill to reach out to the world community to develop clear and concrete objective criterion for the Millennium Challenge Account. We'll apply these criterion fairly and rigorously.

And to jump-start this initiative, I'll work with the United States Congress to make resources available over the 12 months for qualifying countries. Many developing nations are already working hard on the road -- and they're on the road of reform and bringing benefits to their people. The new Compact for Development will reward these nations and encourage others to follow their example.

The goal of our development aid will be for nations to grow and prosper beyond the need for any aid. When nations adopt reforms, each dollar of aid attracts two dollars of private investments. When aid is linked to good policy, four times as many people are lifted out of poverty compared to old aid practices.

All of us here must focus on real benefits to the poor, instead of debating arbitrary levels of inputs from the rich. We should invest in better health and build on our efforts to fight AIDS, which threatens to undermine whole societies. We should give more of our aid in the form of grants, rather than loans that can never be repaid.

The work of development is much broader than development aid. The vast majority of financing for development comes not from aid, but from trade and domestic capital and foreign investment. Developing countries receive approximately $50 billion every year in aid. That is compared to foreign investment of almost $200 billion in annual earnings from exports of $2.4 trillion. So, to be serious about fighting poverty, we must be serious about expanding trade.

Trade helped nations as diverse as South Korea and Chile and China to replace despair with opportunity for millions of their citizens. Trade brings new technology, new ideas and new habits, and trade brings expectations of freedom. And greater access to the markets of wealthy countries has a direct and immediate impact on the economies of developing nations.

As one example, in a single year, the African Growth and Opportunity Act has increased African exports to the United States by more than 1,000 percent, generated nearly $1 billion in investment, and created thousands of jobs.

Yet we have much more to do. Developing nations need greater access to markets of wealthy nations. And we must bring down the high trade barriers between developing nations, themselves. The global trade negotiations launched in Doha confront these challenges.

The success of these negotiations will bring greater prosperity to rich and middle-income and poor nations alike. By one estimate, a new global trade pact could lift 300 million lives out of poverty. When trade advances, there's no question but the fact that poverty retreats.

The task of development is urgent and difficult, yet the way is clear. As we plan and act, we must remember the true source of economic progress is the creativity of human beings. Nations' most vital natural resources are found in the minds and skills and enterprise of their citizens. The greatness of a society is achieved by unleashing the greatness of its people. The poor of the world need resources to meet their needs, and like all people, they deserve institutions that encourage their dreams.

All people deserve governments instituted by their own consent; legal systems that spread opportunity, instead of protecting the narrow interests of a few; and the economic systems that respect their ambition and reward efforts of the people. Liberty and law and opportunity are the conditions for development, and they are the common hopes of mankind.

The spirit of enterprise is not limited by geography or religion or history. Men and women were made for freedom, and prosperity comes as freedom triumphs. And that is why the United States of America is leading the fight for freedom from terror.

We thank our friends and neighbors throughout the world for helping in this great cause. History has called us to a titanic struggle, whose stakes could not be higher because we're fighting for freedom, itself. We're pursuing great and worthy goals to make the world safer, and as we do, to make it better. We will challenge the poverty and hopelessness and lack of education and failed governments that too often allow conditions that terrorists can seize and try to turn to their advantage.

Our new approach for development places responsibility on developing nations and on all nations. We must build the institutions of freedom, not subsidize the failures of the past. We must do more than just feel good about what we are doing, we must do good. By taking the side of liberty and good government, we will liberate millions from poverty's prison. We'll help defeat despair and resentment. We'll draw whole nations into an expanding circle of opportunity and enterprise. We'll gain true partners in development and add a hopeful new chapter to the history of our times.

May God bless you all. (Applause.)

END 9:48 A.M. (Local)

Third: I admit I don't know much about what Farakkan does for the poor. Could you tell me more?
 

Don Jacob

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13842
  • Karma: -136
  • don status, bitch
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2002, 10:19:10 PM »
farrakan only works for the poor becuase he gains from them financially with his  propaganda


infinates argument against bush is that he's only helping the poor becuase that's his job.......all igot to say to that is , at least he's doing his job then, and what a possitive job at that
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »


R.I.P.  To my Queen and Princess 07-05-09
 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2002, 03:07:22 AM »
50% of my parents tax paying money goes to War, so the rich man can get richer.  Only 5 percent goes to education.  Thats absurd. I have to be in a class where there is 50 people in one small classroom on a hot and sticky september day in L.A.  Instead of wasting money on war, give it to the schools.  The schools that are overcrowded.  Some students have to sit on the floor if they want to do their work.  lets fight for education.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

DJ_Jay_Deee

  • Guest
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2002, 04:59:42 AM »
Poverty is always going to be a problem. If the governments really wanted to get rid of poverty they could. But they don't really care. I mean how can you have one guy taking coke, banging bitches, wasting money, etc(a drug dealer), and on the other side of the world you have an african starving ever since he was born(an innocent boy). The world is a fucked up place. Poverty is always goign to be a problem.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

King Tech Quadafi

  • His Royal Highness
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7323
  • Karma: -221
  • i think you betta recognize...
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2002, 05:00:45 AM »
LMFAO @ Bush helping the poor!

holy fuck!

LMFAO!!!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
"One day Alice came to a fork in the road and saw a Cheshire cat in a tree. "Which road do I take?" she asked. "Where do you want to go?" was his response. "I don't know," Alice answered. "Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."

- Lewis Carroll
 

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Made
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12111
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2002, 05:19:26 AM »
In California, we had the best education system. Then ever Mexican's best friend Pete Wilson cut spending in half well our population claimed like a muthaphukka. Oh, and higher class education didn't get cut, bu intercity education did.

Bush in the same light is pushing the no child left behind act, which mean if you child is in a failing school, then the government will give you money to go to priviet school. Sounds goodm except there are 4,000 students in Rialto Eisenhower High School, it's a failing school, so are you going to pay for 4,000 students to transfer schools and over crowd a priviet school well you could have just fixed the pulic school situation. This takes away money from intercity schools that should be fix, but instead are going to keep failing, and the dumping down od the intercity continues. Bush does not care for the poor, as only the poor care about the poor. I can't say too much on Farakkan, cause he ain't going into the barrio anytime, and if your for the poor, your for poor white people, black people, latin people, asian people, and all other poor people. not just one group of people.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4329
  • Karma: 158
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2002, 08:24:03 AM »
Quote
50% of my parents tax paying money goes to War, so the rich man can get richer.  Only 5 percent goes to education.  Thats absurd. I have to be in a class where there is 50 people in one small classroom on a hot and sticky september day in L.A.  Instead of wasting money on war, give it to the schools.  The schools that are overcrowded.  Some students have to sit on the floor if they want to do their work.  lets fight for education.


Could you show me a statistics of a breakdown of your tax dollar?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

HBKid_Jr

  • Guest
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2002, 08:36:05 AM »
whats tha Farakkan done for tha poor white man ???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

King Tech Quadafi

  • His Royal Highness
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7323
  • Karma: -221
  • i think you betta recognize...
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2002, 08:50:27 AM »
Quote


Could you show me a statistics of a breakdown of your tax dollar?


lol this is gettin ridicolous
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
"One day Alice came to a fork in the road and saw a Cheshire cat in a tree. "Which road do I take?" she asked. "Where do you want to go?" was his response. "I don't know," Alice answered. "Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."

- Lewis Carroll
 

Woodrow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4329
  • Karma: 158
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2002, 08:57:22 AM »
Quote


lol this is gettin ridicolous


Why? because I won't blindly accept facts that people put out there?

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Pillow

  • Guest
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2002, 07:47:30 PM »
bush....i ll explain later tho
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

HBKid_Jr

  • Guest
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2002, 08:14:29 PM »
Quote
whats tha Farakkan done for tha poor white man ???

yea,  what has he done for tha poor white man
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Don Jacob

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13842
  • Karma: -136
  • don status, bitch
Re: Who works harder for the poor Bush or Farakkan
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2002, 05:48:14 PM »
here is a factual information


now i'm not making bush to be man of the century like certain muslums here want to do with farrakan but.....



it's a fact that farrakan BENIFITS financially (farrakan is a RICH man) from the poor


Bush was rich before his 'job'  as gov and ten  president took place. Bush as our president makes 300,000 bucks a year ......the most powerful man in the world makes less than what he COULD be making to serve the people of the U.S.


also a good point that was broght up is farrakan only helps blacks what has he done for the poor whites who live in as much poverty in oildale here in california  as blacks in harlem do?

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »


R.I.P.  To my Queen and Princess 07-05-09