Author Topic: Iraq Is A Threat To All Civilization (Read 614 times)

M Dogg™ · « **Reply #25 on:** September 23, 2002, 08:09:54 AM »

The nation with the most weapons of mass distruction, more than all other nations put together, a nation that has uprooted a whole government within the last year, and a nation that has a leader that was not elected by the majority of the people, but rather was appointed to by corrupt ways though family ties is the United States. Personally, I love my nation, I love being in the U.S., and I love my freedoms, and my right to live. But right now we have the wrong people in office, checking others when we should check ourselves. When Clintion was in office, other nations weren't as threated, 'cause they figured that he was a rational person, and as long he was defending himself from sex scandles, he was. Though he too used Iraq as a political distraction to cover up for Monica. Bush is using this as a way to make a legacy, though no one trust him, not even most of the U.S. people. Iraq is not a threat to us, they are a threat to the Middle East, but to us directly, no. Now if we were to say that in fact we were protecting others in the Middle East, then I see this, but Bushes foreign policies are very questionable. Thank God for Powell, 'cause he has helped us avoid too many problems thanks to Bush.

King Tech Quadafi · « **Reply #26 on:** September 23, 2002, 08:31:27 AM »

Quote

The nation with the most weapons of mass distruction, more than all other nations put together, a nation that has uprooted a whole government within the last year, and a nation that has a leader that was not elected by the majority of the people, but rather was appointed to by corrupt ways though family ties is the United States. Personally, I love my nation, I love being in the U.S., and I love my freedoms, and my right to live. But right now we have the wrong people in office, checking others when we should check ourselves. When Clintion was in office, other nations weren't as threated, 'cause they figured that he was a rational person, and as long he was defending himself from sex scandles, he was. Though he too used Iraq as a political distraction to cover up for Monica. Bush is using this as a way to make a legacy, though no one trust him, not even most of the U.S. people. Iraq is not a threat to us, they are a threat to the Middle East, but to us directly, no. Now if we were to say that in fact we were protecting others in the Middle East, then I see this, but Bushes foreign policies are very questionable. Thank God for Powell, 'cause he has helped us avoid too many problems thanks to Bush.

i can always count on you to come thru homie

Sikotic™ · « **Reply #27 on:** September 23, 2002, 08:35:57 AM »

Quote

The nation with the most weapons of mass distruction, more than all other nations put together, a nation that has uprooted a whole government within the last year, and a nation that has a leader that was not elected by the majority of the people, but rather was appointed to by corrupt ways though family ties is the United States. Personally, I love my nation, I love being in the U.S., and I love my freedoms, and my right to live. But right now we have the wrong people in office, checking others when we should check ourselves. When Clintion was in office, other nations weren't as threated, 'cause they figured that he was a rational person, and as long he was defending himself from sex scandles, he was. Though he too used Iraq as a political distraction to cover up for Monica. Bush is using this as a way to make a legacy, though no one trust him, not even most of the U.S. people. Iraq is not a threat to us, they are a threat to the Middle East, but to us directly, no. Now if we were to say that in fact we were protecting others in the Middle East, then I see this, but Bushes foreign policies are very questionable. Thank God for Powell, 'cause he has helped us avoid too many problems thanks to Bush.

The most sensible post in this thread. I completely agree.

Don Seer · « **Reply #28 on:** September 23, 2002, 09:06:20 AM »

m dogg for president!

Pillow · « **Reply #29 on:** September 23, 2002, 01:45:05 PM »

Quote

It hasno connections with either 9/11, or any other terrorist organization (maybe u dont realize how much Muslims hate that man), so this hypothetical scenerio of Saddam giving terrorists weapons is baseless,

lol, dude saddem pays the famlies of sucide bombers for those that go to israel and commit sucide bombings. now thats not america but that is terroism..

King Tech Quadafi · « **Reply #30 on:** September 23, 2002, 03:19:54 PM »

Quote

lol, dude saddem pays the famlies of sucide bombers for those that go to israel and commit sucide bombings. now thats not america but that is terroism..

whats next? the IRA? Kashmiri militants? Palestinian militants?
Phillipine militants? Terrorists in the Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone? Chechen rebels? Muslims fighting for autonomy in China? Tamil Tigers? The Mujahedin eh Khalq? Hezbollah?
Basque separatist rebels? The Muslim Brotherhood? Algerian Islamists?

if youre implying the US should go after every terrorist in the world, youre sayin America has the right to flaunt international law and the sovereignity of nations.....

Sikotic™ · « **Reply #31 on:** September 23, 2002, 04:13:03 PM »

Man we should be after Korea in the first place.

ITW [the irish boy] · « **Reply #32 on:** September 24, 2002, 02:11:24 AM »

You say saddam pays families of suicide bombers?
US Equivilent:
Providing Israeli troops with armour to bulldoze the houses and livelyhoods of the bombers immediate family
Similaritys : Terrorism
Differences : Saddam owns oil

Acts of Horror:

3,000 dead in the WTC - worthy of world war?
200,000 dead in Hirsohima + Nagasaki - not a war crime

democracy of hypocrisy.