U.S. considers military attack on Iran, let the countdown begin..

[Jome]

This is why:



Parchin, Teheran

The possibilities for attack and dates are being discussed in Washington.
American nuclear expert David Albright says "Parchin could be a place where nuclear weapons are being developed, tested and researched".
Bush said on a earlier point that "We can not tolerate that Iran makes nuclear weapons"
Targets in Iran is already being scheduled and planned, and co-operation with Israel is being considered. (Israel is also a nuclear power)

U.S. came to agreements with U.K., France, Germany about a resolution about Iran's nuclear program.
31st of October is being mentioned as a deadline for Iran to co-operate, and allow even more inspections.

Source: VG/NTB

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This smells Iraq a mile away..
How many months left, I say.. co-operation or not. 

[mauzip]

Attacking Iran was one of the reasons for invading Iraq.

[white Boy]

ok lets take bets ... i say.. right before election.. and if hes president.. god help iran

[Montana00]

The thing is this. Invading iran wouldnt be as easy as invading iraq.

It sucks to be in the position of president nowadays. I would never be it. Nuclear and terrorism threats everywhere.

How long do you wait before you stop a country from becoming a nuclear threat?

wait too long and you are critized for letting the worst happen. Attack too soon and be critisized for attacking a defenseless country.

let's see how this one plays out. hopefully if this gets worse, countries back us up.

This is the world we live in....

[pappy]

LET the countdown to the draft begin

[mauzip]

you see... i don't think they will invade iran... not yet at least... they'll probably just attack some targets

[Montana00]

Well if Iran is only starting to build, then the US will just bomb the plants.

[M Dogg™]

China, France, England and the United States all have nukes. We should get rid of all of their weapons first, especially the U.S., since they have been showing a very agressive nature as of late. On the real, what are we afraid of. We viewed the Soviet Union as a greater threat than this little countries. If they lay on nuke, then we'll have them a black waste field in a matter of minutes. They know that. Iran well not attack the U.S. Bin Laden did because he knew we couldn't find him. It's like Saddam, he would have never attacked us because he had too much to lose, and he lost it. His sons, his mansions, his country. Now his in jail, aging very fast. Iran is the same way. And the political make up of Iran is not stable anyways. I mean, they have young college students protesting for democracy. They will fit themselves, why indanger more American lives just because we are scared of a threat that is not there.

[mauzip]

you really have fucking no clue what you're talking about. remember the last iranian elections??

[Sikotic™]

More billions towards useless warfare HORAAAAAAAAAY!!!

[Immortal]

i think Iran will really get involved in this with the US, possibly start involving neighbouring countries as well, this move would startle the Arab nations, and in time oil-rich nations would begin to invest their oil into Euros. America's casualties would increase dramatically...I don't like the sound of this....

THe only reason i dont want america to get involved in the war is since im in Canada and our economy is dependant on US...time to immigrate to Sweden or Switserland or Norway or Finland....

[Trauma-san]

This is a bullshit post, wherever you grabbed it from.  The quotes are obviously translated out of another language, and talks in Washington of invading Iran would be the first thing John Kerry would be talking about right now on the campaign trail, if they were true.  Conclusion: They must not be true, or they'd be talking about it everywhere. 

[King Tech Quadafi]

you really have fucking no clue what you're talking about. remember the last iranian elections??

M dogg just explained to you what the situation is and you respond with a useless question?

[Jome]

This is a bullshit post, wherever you grabbed it from.  The quotes are obviously translated out of another language, and talks in Washington of invading Iran would be the first thing John Kerry would be talking about right now on the campaign trail, if they were true.  Conclusion: They must not be true, or they'd be talking about it everywhere. 

Far from bullshit.

Yes, it's translated from Norwegian, from a very credible newspaper, and the information is brand new.
I cut out the yada yada babbling, and kept the important parts, obviously not in a journalistic language.

What strikes me, is that I almost never see a lot of this news on CNN, it's like they're holding certain news back on purpose.
The Iran resolution news ticked in 1 hour before the thread was made, so I can understand that they were late on that one though.

[Don Jacob]

i'd be against this war, no reason to war, strong arm them into submission like Libya , but not another war