« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
  
Go Down

Author Topic: church to the palace vs laylow  (Read 934 times)

kalliweed

  • Guest
church to the palace vs laylow
« on: September 22, 2002, 04:07:14 PM »
church to the palace is growin on me......i think neptunes did a good job....especially the scratch..it will difinately blow trust me..better single than laylow and snoop dogg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Suga Foot

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2002, 04:09:24 PM »
ok
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2002, 04:12:51 PM »
ya i prefer the new shit instead of lay low, don't ask me why, i don'T kn0w. more bumpin , don'T know
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
snoop dogg - "i don't fuck with the pocus everybody
knows this , i fuck with the chronic cause the chronic
gives me dopeness"                                   

- Look here bitch you're fine and i dig your style...-
 

E. J. Rizo

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2002, 04:18:20 PM »
well i respect your decisions but im laughing at the same time cause lay low was straight westcoast gangsta beat with a tight as flow and just a bad ass song in general im not saying this new shit sucks or anything its aight but not as good as lay low... maybe about the same as snoop dogg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

.:Hercy Buggz:.

  • The Soul Brotha
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7329
  • Thanked: 10 times
  • Karma: 285
  • Time For Sumthin New
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2002, 04:21:58 PM »
Quote
well i respect your decisions but im laughing at the same time cause lay low was straight westcoast gangsta beat with a tight as flow and just a bad ass song in general im not saying this new shit sucks or anything its aight but not as good as lay low... maybe about the same as snoop dogg


thats right!!!

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

LIL GUY

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 350
  • Karma: 2
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2002, 04:23:11 PM »
I think from the chuuch to the palace too.  this shit grows on you fast. you got a lot of fans who love dre so since neptunes are hotter than dre right now they kinda hatin'.  but the shit is diffrent I always like new shit.  Im tired of hearing the same ol dre beat.  same ol base like same snare same sound.  Neptunes tried some different shit with snoop.  that second and third verse is some cool shit.  plus law low had master p rappin on it and goldie had a bad verse.  whoever says this song will not blow up i crazy.  Snoop pays bet and mtv to play his video's.  he pays the radio stations.  do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

.:Hercy Buggz:.

  • The Soul Brotha
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7329
  • Thanked: 10 times
  • Karma: 285
  • Time For Sumthin New
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2002, 04:25:35 PM »
Quote
I think from the chuuch to the palace too.  this shit grows on you fast. you got a lot of fans who love dre so since neptunes are hotter than dre right now they kinda hatin'.  but the shit is diffrent I always like new shit.  Im tired of hearing the same ol dre beat.  same ol base like same snare same sound.  Neptunes tried some different shit with snoop.  that second and third verse is some cool shit.  plus law low had master p rappin on it and goldie had a bad verse.  whoever says this song will not blow up i crazy.  Snoop pays bet and mtv to play his video's.  he pays the radio stations.  do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.


thats right!!!

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

TOOTHBRUSH

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1925
  • Karma: 11
  • dpg production
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2002, 04:43:40 PM »
people are forgetting they are hearing bad quality.........the beat is nice and in good quality it'll be nice it's got a real eastcoast feel to it.............it and actually got that upbeat shit that kinda makes you wanna dance too and nobody is gonna hate on the flow.................remember "snoop dogg" got mad radio play so you know this shit will it reminds me of "snoop dogg" on steroids or somethin
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
"its tha pimp of tha crew soopafly comin through wit a dick and a couple balls just to name a few"-soopafly
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2002, 04:43:56 PM »
Quote
 do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.

thats right lol at first i tought snoop was doin a collabo, and a wack one, than i saw it was his video and shit. i said dawm ... but it grew on me but this new one betta
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
snoop dogg - "i don't fuck with the pocus everybody
knows this , i fuck with the chronic cause the chronic
gives me dopeness"                                   

- Look here bitch you're fine and i dig your style...-
 

Jome

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2002, 04:46:50 PM »
Lay Low is about 1000 times better than the new one.
Yall gotta be joking if you like this better than Lay Low.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

teecee

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2002, 04:49:26 PM »
Lay Low was pretty basic, whereas this new song is some next shit man..although i still can't say i like it completely.  At least it ain't that tired old gangsta shit....Plus, Snoop sounds awesome on his new song, despite te odd beat.....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

E. J. Rizo

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2002, 04:55:13 PM »
"for the nigga who be  talkin loud and holdin his dick talkin shit.....he better lllaaaaay llloooooowwww"

-Nate Dogg-

man lay low is just a classic track i dont care if P was on it you guys act like if he was in it no matter what it sucks and he sounded best there flow wise then any other songs he is in.......no doubt that lay low is better than this new stuff....but like i said like both just cant compare from chuuch to the palace with lay low
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2002, 05:06:50 PM »
Quote
church to the palace is growin on me......i think neptunes did a good job....especially the scratch..it will difinately blow trust me..better single than laylow and snoop dogg


Eww. Tha new single iz ass!
Logged
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

AFTERMATH_FAN

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Karma: 0
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2002, 06:01:44 PM »
I have to agree with you ejrizo.The new single is horrible and not even in the same league as Lay Low!!Just listen to lay low how its mixed and how it flows,its just a classic.Like I said earlier Snoop shouldn't stray away from what works but in the long run he will learn the hard way.Im a firm believer in if its not broke then dont fix it!!Comparing the two is like comparing a lexus to a kia,theres just no comparison.Basically the neptunes style doesnt fit Snoop dog,thats just my opinion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Lil Jay

  • Solution Of Prostitution
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10951
  • Karma: 717
Re: church to the palace vs laylow
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2002, 10:08:26 PM »
Quote
man lay low is just a classic track i dont care if P was on it you guys act like if he was in it no matter what it sucks and he sounded best there flow wise then any other songs he is in.......no doubt that lay low is better than this new stuff....but like i said like both just cant compare from chuuch to the palace with lay low

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
www.dubcnn.com - west coast news network  |  www.westcoast2k.net - independent west coast hip hop network
 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  
Go Up
« previous next »