Israel claims Iran will have nukes in 12 months

[Woodrow]

The Israeli defence minister, Shaul Mofaz, warned yesterday that Iran will reach "the point of no return" within the next 12 months in its covert attempt to secure a nuclear weapons capability.
Tehran denies pursuing a nuclear weapons programme.

Speaking in London before a meeting today with Tony Blair, Lieutenant General Mofaz said Iran was the main long-term threat to the world and stressed that it will not be permitted to build a nuclear bomb. "None of the western countries can live with Iran having a nuclear capability," he told reporters.

Gen Mofaz, a hawk in the Israeli cabinet, who has said in the past that Israel has operational plans in place for a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, refused to rule out military action.

Mr Blair, speaking in the Commons yesterday, said the Iranian issue was serious. Asked by a former Labour minister, Michael Meacher, to give an "unequivocal and categorical assurance" that Britain would not take part in any attack on Iran, Mr Blair said: "I know of no such contemplation by the United States of America."

In an interview with the Financial Times yesterday, Mr Blair refused to rule out the option of using military force.

With the US bogged down in the Iraq conflict, opening another front in Iran would be risky. Iran's Shebab-3 rockets are theoretically capable of hitting Israel.

The Israeli and US rhetoric has grown more strident in the last week and could be aimed at pushing Britain, France and Germany into taking a tougher diplomatic approach towards Iran.

The US vice-president, Dick Cheney, said last week that Israel might launch a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, as it did against Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.

Gen Mofaz indicated yesterday that he thought the US rather than Israel should do it: "It is the strongest power that can stop any nuclear power, especially in the hands of an extreme regime."

US officials have confirmed privately a report by the US reporter Seymour Hersh, in the New Yorker, that US special forces have already been in Iran scouting out its nuclear facilities.

Gen Mofaz, who was born in Iran but left for Israel while a child, said: "Iran is very close to the point of no return, which means the enrichment of uranium, and we believe that the leadership of the US, together with the European countries, should stop as soon as possible this military nuclear programme in Iran."

He added that this point of no return would be reached "in less than a year" and that it would only be "a matter of years" after that that it would assemble the bomb .

The Israeli intelligence assessment, shared by the US and Britain, is that Iran could have a bomb by 2007.

The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, flew with his German and French counterparts to Tehran late in 2003 to broker a deal with Iran to suspend its enrichment programme. The deal broke down last year when the troika accused Iran of reneging on the deal. A new round of negotiations is under way and expected to drag on for at least a few months.

Like the US, which is equally sceptical, Israel is pushing for the issue to be referred to the United Nations for the imposition of sanctions and deep inspections by UN staff of Iran's nuclear facilities.

Gen Mofaz's comment about "point of no return" echoed a private briefing by Meir Dagan, the head of the Israeli overseas intelligence service, Mossad, to members of the Knesset on Monday. Mr Dagan said Mr Cheney's remark that Israel might make a pre-emptive strike was aimed at pressing Europe to adopt the tougher US approach towards Iran.

Britain, France and Germany have switched to a harder approach towards Iran. A confidential EU document leaked to Reuters and confirmed independently said the troika had told Iran it would be "unacceptable" for Tehran to keep its uranium enrichment programme, even if, as it claims, it is solely for civil purposes.

The commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard ground forces, Brigadier General Mohammad Ali Jafari, said yesterday: "Iran will retaliate against any stupid moves by Israel."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,12858,1399378,00.html

[Matrix Heart]

lmao "the point of no return" <--- that means we(israel) can't bully them any more 



When DOES the US invade iran?

israel will attack Iran first.

[*Jamal*]

LOL. There's so much I could say about this, but I'll just drop a "Good for them"

[Woodrow]

LOL. There's so much I could say about this, but I'll just drop a "Good for them"

Good for who?

[7even]

Sounds familiar.

[Sikotic™]

Bush better send them some flowers and a Hallmark card.

[Doggystylin]

lol @ israeli intelligence, i didnt know that existed, i thought they just listened to whatever the CIA told them

[Don Rizzle]

lol @ israeli intelligence, i didnt know that existed, i thought they just listened to whatever the CIA told them

read up about mossad fool

[white Boy]

i thought iran already had nukes.. now im confused.. i should really keep out of tot   

[King Tech Quadafi]

Irans been jonesing for a nuke for a long time.


My whole response to this englewood, is so what?

What is the point here. Are you advocating military response in this situation? Doesnt it seem rather hypocritical, you dunce,
for three nuclear powers to tell Iran it cant have any? Considering that Israel is sitting on 100-200 nuclear warheads in the same region as Iran? (And as bad as Irans sins have been, they HAVENT been occupying an entire ethnic population for the last 60 years.

[Woodrow]

Irans been jonesing for a nuke for a long time.


My whole response to this englewood, is so what?

What is the point here. Are you advocating military response in this situation? Doesnt it seem rather hypocritical, you dunce,
for three nuclear powers to tell Iran it cant have any? Considering that Israel is sitting on 100-200 nuclear warheads in the same region as Iran? (And as bad as Irans sins have been, they HAVENT been occupying an entire ethnic population for the last 60 years.

LOL at you comparing Israel having Nukes with Iran having nukes.

Israel having nukes is not a threat to our security. Iran having nukes is a threat to our security.

[7even]

^I'd rather have a country that hasnt started a war recently having nukes than a country that has started 2 wars during the past 4 years (and is about to start a 3rd one) having nukes.

[Woodrow]

^I'd rather have a country that hasnt started a war recently having nukes than a country that has started 2 wars during the past 4 years (and is about to start a 3rd one) having nukes.

Right. Because the US is threat to stable democracies.

[Ant]

Irans been jonesing for a nuke for a long time.


My whole response to this englewood, is so what?

What is the point here. Are you advocating military response in this situation? Doesnt it seem rather hypocritical, you dunce,
for three nuclear powers to tell Iran it cant have any? Considering that Israel is sitting on 100-200 nuclear warheads in the same region as Iran? (And as bad as Irans sins have been, they HAVENT been occupying an entire ethnic population for the last 60 years.

LOL at you comparing Israel having Nukes with Iran having nukes.

Israel having nukes is not a threat to our security. Iran having nukes is a threat to our security.

Bigotted republicans that start and support foolish wars with embarassing consquences are a threat to american security. 

[Woodrow]

Bigotted republicans that start and support foolish wars with embarassing consquences are a threat to american security. 

Sorry, I don't know what that has to do with Iran having nukes in 12 months.