Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
The Official Professional Wrestling Thread (WWE, TNA, etc.)
UKnowWhatItIs: welcome to my traps....game over:
--- Quote from: AlerG on December 04, 2007, 01:17:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Step Ya Game Up on December 04, 2007, 01:09:30 AM ---
--- Quote from: AlerG on December 03, 2007, 02:29:53 PM ---
--- Quote from: Step Ya Game Up on December 03, 2007, 12:54:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: SGV on December 02, 2007, 11:22:00 PM ---I still like the Steiners. They suck in TNA cuz they're not getting the proper push, IMO. But yeah, Scott becoming an asshole wasn't the best move for his career. Steroids fucked with him big time.
--- End quote ---
Scott is one of my favorites of all time & becoming an asshole is one of the reasons why he's my favorite. Every time you watch an interview or a convo with him you know it's going to be good.
--- End quote ---
His wrestling skills are so limited now, he looks incredible stiff and off time in the ring. Go back to the early 90's and watch a Steiners match if you want to see them when they were in their prime. Scott's 'Frankensteiner' used to be fantastic,
chill
--- End quote ---
lol you think I haven't seen Scott Steiner before, that I only just started watching wrestling??? I've been watching wrestling ever since I was a little kid & I'm 20 now. You don't need to tell me how good he used to be because I've already seen his old matches. Of course he's not as good as he used to be but I think he's still good, people are making it seem like he's the worst wrestler ever. His matches at TNA are so much better than 90% of the matches at the current WWE. If we wanna talk about falling off, let's talk about Shawn Michaels, Triple H etc.
--- End quote ---
If you're gonna get cranky have mom put some johnson and johnson on you after changing your diaper. Take it easy. Now that you've proven yourself and put me in my place I'll speak on your Michaels comment. Comparing Michaels in his prime to today isn't a huge difference, he stills carries 90% of matches, get it right. Comparing Steiner in his prime to now is a difference, 90% of the time he looks as if he could be carried on a stretcher,
chill
--- End quote ---
What are you getting all emotional for??? lol did I diss you in my post or did my opinion just get you all butt hurt??? Telling me to take it easy ::) Fucking retard. Shawn Michaels ain't shit compared to what he used to be. Scott actually does wrestling moves/grabs while Michaels does ... well I don't even know what he does in the ring cause his matches bore me to death. End of story.
AlerG:
--- Quote from: Step Ya Game Up on December 05, 2007, 12:14:19 AM ---
--- Quote from: AlerG on December 04, 2007, 01:17:07 PM ---
--- Quote from: Step Ya Game Up on December 04, 2007, 01:09:30 AM ---
--- Quote from: AlerG on December 03, 2007, 02:29:53 PM ---
--- Quote from: Step Ya Game Up on December 03, 2007, 12:54:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: SGV on December 02, 2007, 11:22:00 PM ---I still like the Steiners. They suck in TNA cuz they're not getting the proper push, IMO. But yeah, Scott becoming an asshole wasn't the best move for his career. Steroids fucked with him big time.
--- End quote ---
Scott is one of my favorites of all time & becoming an asshole is one of the reasons why he's my favorite. Every time you watch an interview or a convo with him you know it's going to be good.
--- End quote ---
His wrestling skills are so limited now, he looks incredible stiff and off time in the ring. Go back to the early 90's and watch a Steiners match if you want to see them when they were in their prime. Scott's 'Frankensteiner' used to be fantastic,
chill
--- End quote ---
lol you think I haven't seen Scott Steiner before, that I only just started watching wrestling??? I've been watching wrestling ever since I was a little kid & I'm 20 now. You don't need to tell me how good he used to be because I've already seen his old matches. Of course he's not as good as he used to be but I think he's still good, people are making it seem like he's the worst wrestler ever. His matches at TNA are so much better than 90% of the matches at the current WWE. If we wanna talk about falling off, let's talk about Shawn Michaels, Triple H etc.
--- End quote ---
If you're gonna get cranky have mom put some johnson and johnson on you after changing your diaper. Take it easy. Now that you've proven yourself and put me in my place I'll speak on your Michaels comment. Comparing Michaels in his prime to today isn't a huge difference, he stills carries 90% of matches, get it right. Comparing Steiner in his prime to now is a difference, 90% of the time he looks as if he could be carried on a stretcher,
chill
--- End quote ---
What are you getting all emotional for??? lol did I diss you in my post or did my opinion just get you all butt hurt??? Telling me to take it easy ::) Fucking retard. Shawn Michaels ain't shit compared to what he used to be. Scott actually does wrestling moves/grabs while Michaels does ... well I don't even know what he does in the ring cause his matches bore me to death. End of story.
--- End quote ---
Am I the only one who doesn't remotely agree with what you're saying?
chill
STILLDRE IS THE GODFATHER:
lol at micheals not being good dude hes been the best performer in the last wrestlemanias against angle and cena the match he did abroad with cena which lasted and hour was probaly 1 of the best matches in years seriously im a big fan of scott and him bringing back the frankinstiener a few months back was great but that and a few belly to belly doesnt cover the fact that hes not what he was a few years back in the ring
UKnowWhatItIs: welcome to my traps....game over:
^Oh & Michaels is as good as he used to be??? I don't think so. Belly to belly>>>Shawn Michaels
Styles1:
Michaels can still carry a 15 to 20 min. match....
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version