Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
The Official Professional Wrestling Thread (WWE, TNA, etc.)
MontrealCity's Most:
That list is crazy....
1. Hulk Hogan
2. Steve Autin
4. The Rock
5. Undertaker
6. HBk
7. Bret HArt
8. HHH
9. Randy Savage
10. Mick Foley
Thats the top 10 no matter how you cut it
Sikotic™:
--- Quote from: MontrealCity's Most (ToyBoxcrew) on November 22, 2010, 04:04:58 PM ---That list is crazy....
1. Hulk Hogan
2. Steve Autin
4. The Rock
5. Undertaker
6. HBk
7. Bret HArt
8. HHH
9. Randy Savage
10. Mick Foley
Thats the top 10 no matter how you cut it
--- End quote ---
Well we can all agree that that's a lot closer than WWE ever had it with their list.
There's a definite TNA bias when you look at the list too.
MontrealCity's Most:
My list is simple based on accomplishments, popularity and what they did for the compagny in their respective eras.. my top3 cannot be debated . Undertaker, hart and Hbk were all the top guys during a tuff time while HHH, foley and savage also can be shuffled but those guys were the reason why Austin, rock were so good.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: JohnnyL on November 22, 2010, 12:14:10 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sikotic = DBA on November 22, 2010, 10:38:47 AM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on November 22, 2010, 08:26:12 AM ---Has anyone posted the WWE.com list of the 50 best WWE wrestlers of all time?
--- End quote ---
I'm waiting for them to come out and say it was a joke.
I think they put Hogan at like #24 or something like that? Not a Hogan fan by any means, but that was easily their biggest name in the 80's.
--- End quote ---
Not a fan at all of Hogan's in-ring ability (or lack thereof), but unless in-ring ability is the only thing they're using to gauge this list, Hogan should be higher on the list. At least in the top ten. On the other hand, if they were talking about in-ring ability, Hogan probably shouldn't be on the list at all.
--- End quote ---
If it's based on in-ring then Undertaker at #2 would be the biggest joke ever. As far as a complete package of in ring work, draw power, impact on the company, I don't see how anyone can be placed above Steve Austin? He could work a great match, and carry lesser opponents if he had to, he generate more money than anyone, and he was the main guy responsible for turning the company around when they almost went under.
Flair beats Austin in a history of wrestling list, but as far as with regards to WWE and what they did for WWE it has to be Austin.
Sikotic™:
Raw was........AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(sorry....had to do it)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version