Champions League Final- Barcelona vs Arsenal

[Don Seer]

eh? since when does being behind a ball affect the offside rule???

were there, or were there not two players opposing players beyond the ball.. ?

[Mac 10 †]

if guily was behind the line of eto'o when he played it round lehmann no matter who else was there then he is onside.

[ABN]

Larsson had 2 great assists and this is what Henry had to say
"everybody´s talking about Ronaldinho but i didn´t even see him today, i saw Henkrik Larsson. He came in and changed the game and it was he who killed it. when y´all talking about Ronaldinho and Eto'o y´all should talk about the player who really made a difference, and tonight it was Henkrik Larsson"

[7even]

It's a common rule in soccer that you can let the game continue after a foul if it is in favor of the fouled team. Which was the case, since they shot a fucking goal.
Jome you're just talking shit because those norway niggas fucked up majorly.

[mauzip]

eh? since when does being behind a ball affect the offside rule???

Guily was behind the ball when Eto'o played the ball, so it was not offside. Those are the rules ever since the offside rules got introduced.

[HD]

fuck norway

[eS El Duque]

Barca!

[Antonio_]

The ref killed the match, that's a fact.

[ABN]

The ref killed the match, that's a fact.

but people should blame Lehman just as much as they blame the ref. he should´ve read the situation a lot better and kept his arms in. we all know how easy it is to put the ball past a keeper like that and 99/100 the keeper will take you down without bein close to getting the ball.

[Antonio_]

The ref killed the match, that's a fact.

but people should blame Lehman just as much as they blame the ref. he should´ve read the situation a lot better and kept his arms in. we all know how easy it is to put the ball past a keeper like that and 99/100 the keeper will take you down without bein close to getting the ball.

Maybe you misunderstood me, i was saying that it should have been 1-0 for Barca, instead Arsenal closed the first half in advantage, just absurd!

[K.Dub]

Those referees ruined the whole evening.

.., and he is Norwegian.. I'm ashamed on his behalf..

[Mac 10 †]

The ref killed the match, that's a fact.

but people should blame Lehman just as much as they blame the ref. he should´ve read the situation a lot better and kept his arms in. we all know how easy it is to put the ball past a keeper like that and 99/100 the keeper will take you down without bein close to getting the ball.

lehmann did what he had to do, as did the ref.

[Jome]

Jome you're just talking shit because those norway niggas fucked up majorly.

You're just mad because that German crackhead got sent off.
CLEAREST RED CARD I've seen this year, if anything, Lehmann killed the game.

The Ref did what he had to do.
Some times it seems like it's only Mac & Javi and a few others who know their Football in here..

[mauzip]

and me

[7even]

Jome you're just talking shit because those norway niggas fucked up majorly.

You're just mad because that German crackhead got sent off.
CLEAREST RED CARD I've seen this year, if anything, Lehmann killed the game.

The Ref did what he had to do.
Some times it seems like it's only Mac & Javi and a few others who know their Football in here..

Shut the fuck up, just because I have a different opinion doesn't mean I don't know football, as my opinion is absolutely rational.
What he did was a red card, normally. BUT IF THE FOULED TEAM HAS AN ADVANTAGE WHEN YOU LET THE GAME GO ON THE REF DOESNT HAVE TO USE HIS WHISTLE. If you don't know that rule, then YOU don't know football. Barca shot a goal. So they had an advantage. Letting that goal count and not calling Lehmann for a foul is TOTALLY within the rules. Why else you think Barca players were pissed off? It would have been a red card if Barca didn't get that goal. But the did. So you can let that fucking goal count instead of the foul. THIS IS A RULE, not some crap Im pulling out of my ass.