Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Ant:
--- Quote from: Real American on May 31, 2006, 06:11:36 PM ---Yes of course. Whenever the Democrats lose an election, it was because it was stolen from them. Not because the Republicans got more votes. And the fact that Republicans dominate the Senate and the House....that is because of voter fraud as well.
Just stop with the nonsense....
--- End quote ---
What do you care if people investigate this issue? If its BS its really inconsequential. It's well known, both sides cheat in election time. Even in local campaigns there is cheating. It's obvoiusly over and done with, but if there was intentional fruad, and there was, people should pay the consquences,... and if you were in the know, u'd realize, some of your republican buddies are paying the consequences for election related fraud in ohio.
TOLEDO, Ohio - A coin dealer and prominent GOP fundraiser at the center of an Ohio political scandal pleaded guilty Wednesday to federal charges he illegally funneled about $45,000 to President Bush's re-election campaign.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14708901.htm
This isn't about whining over winning or losing. Scrutiny of the political process is good for dems and republicans alike. If we're going to make a move to electronic voting systems, we need people to investigate and raise concerns about the validity of our process.
Don Rizzle:
whats next the Beano scrutinising the UN?
virtuoso:
J Bananas completely off topic again why mention spying when this is a topic about the elections. Lol in your own retarded way I guess your kind of unique but since you asked me.....the government says nothing to hide nothing to fear and yet government is more secretive than ever before and dont exactly inspire confidence.
Ant:
here is the actual article. I havent' read it yet.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen/print
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version