It's May 23, 2024, 09:31:15 AM
Quote from: Ant on June 23, 2006, 06:19:25 PMQuote from: Lincoln on June 23, 2006, 04:06:01 PM2 wrong.People read too much into Ann Coulter, she's actually quite entertaining and much of what she says is sprinkled with truth.you have to be semi-retarded to defend ann coulter. I think you have to be full on retarded to compare Hitler, who was responsible for millions upon millions of innocent deaths, to Ann Coulter, who has an entertaining schtick where she points out many truths about liberals, who by the way are often retarded.
Quote from: Lincoln on June 23, 2006, 04:06:01 PM2 wrong.People read too much into Ann Coulter, she's actually quite entertaining and much of what she says is sprinkled with truth.you have to be semi-retarded to defend ann coulter.
2 wrong.People read too much into Ann Coulter, she's actually quite entertaining and much of what she says is sprinkled with truth.
Quote from: Lincoln on June 23, 2006, 07:50:35 PMOften=all the same?Retarded is also a word which can be used in many different contexts. For example, Ted Kennedy as a liberal is more retarded then, say, John Kerry. Therefore not all the same.Often = more-or-less the same.Either way, it's hypocritical for Coulter and many conservatives to associate liberals with Marxists and Maoists and then get offended when they're associated with fascists. And Coulter may be an entertainer, but the people who look up to her obviously take her seriously.
Often=all the same?Retarded is also a word which can be used in many different contexts. For example, Ted Kennedy as a liberal is more retarded then, say, John Kerry. Therefore not all the same.