Lifestyle > Train of Thought
If Muslims are terrorists than what do you call these acts by whites ?
Don Seer:
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:44:41 PM ---The IRA example is truely right. When they blasted a bomb, it wasnt said CHRISTIAN terrorists. Suppose if Northern Ireland were to be a Muslim state, and they blasted a bomb in U.K, would you still call it a terror attack or just an "INCIDENT"
--- End quote ---
no its not!!.. and you just sonned yourself.. and proved your lack of knowledge on the situation.
if northern ireland 'were' muslim in this analogy.. then england would be "muslim" too.. you got facts all sideways..
northern ireland wasn't bombing shit..
and i will repeat.. the IRA were not on a religious campaign.
the IRA was an organisation NOT built along religious lines, but along ANTI UNIONIST lines. that is they were opposed to northern ireland being seperate from the rest of ireland. (and being in a union with england). so the IRA was not "northern irish" as you seem to think.. to back this up further.. there are northern irish catholics who BACK the union. this means there were catholics on BOTH sides of the conflict.
Lieutenant Abdul-Shakur:
--- Quote from: Overseer on July 06, 2006, 01:56:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:44:41 PM ---The IRA example is truely right. When they blasted a bomb, it wasnt said CHRISTIAN terrorists. Suppose if Northern Ireland were to be a Muslim state, and they blasted a bomb in U.K, would you still call it a terror attack or just an "INCIDENT"
--- End quote ---
no its not!!.. and you just sonned yourself.. and proved your lack of knowledge on the situation.
if northern ireland 'were' muslim in this analogy.. then england would be "muslim" too.. you got facts all sideways..
northern ireland wasn't bombing shit..
and i will repeat.. the IRA were not on a religious campaign.
the IRA was an organisation NOT built along religious lines, but along ANTI UNIONIST lines. that is they were opposed to northern ireland being seperate from the rest of ireland. (and being in a union with england). so the IRA was not "northern irish" as you seem to think.. to back this up further.. there are northern irish catholics who BACK the union. this means there were catholics on BOTH sides of the conflict.
--- End quote ---
geese man, WHEN THE FUCK DID I SAID IRA IS A RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN ? scroll up, re-read my post. anaylze.think.re-think.realize.
Don Seer:
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:58:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: Overseer on July 06, 2006, 01:56:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:44:41 PM ---The IRA example is truely right. When they blasted a bomb, it wasnt said CHRISTIAN terrorists. Suppose if Northern Ireland were to be a Muslim state, and they blasted a bomb in U.K, would you still call it a terror attack or just an "INCIDENT"
--- End quote ---
no its not!!.. and you just sonned yourself.. and proved your lack of knowledge on the situation.
if northern ireland 'were' muslim in this analogy.. then england would be "muslim" too.. you got facts all sideways..
northern ireland wasn't bombing shit..
and i will repeat.. the IRA were not on a religious campaign.
the IRA was an organisation NOT built along religious lines, but along ANTI UNIONIST lines. that is they were opposed to northern ireland being seperate from the rest of ireland. (and being in a union with england). so the IRA was not "northern irish" as you seem to think.. to back this up further.. there are northern irish catholics who BACK the union. this means there were catholics on BOTH sides of the conflict.
--- End quote ---
geese man, WHEN THE FUCK DID I SAID IRA IS A RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN ? scroll up, re-read my post. anaylze.think.re-think.realize.
--- End quote ---
you were asking why they werent called "christian terrorists"..
the propoganda you posted asked "why were their acts were not attributed to the Christian religion."
the answer has already been posted by me at least 4 or so times now. because the conflict was a non-religious one.
Lieutenant Abdul-Shakur:
--- Quote from: Overseer on July 06, 2006, 02:07:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:58:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: Overseer on July 06, 2006, 01:56:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: Abdul-Shakur : Seeking The Light on July 06, 2006, 01:44:41 PM ---The IRA example is truely right. When they blasted a bomb, it wasnt said CHRISTIAN terrorists. Suppose if Northern Ireland were to be a Muslim state, and they blasted a bomb in U.K, would you still call it a terror attack or just an "INCIDENT"
--- End quote ---
no its not!!.. and you just sonned yourself.. and proved your lack of knowledge on the situation.
if northern ireland 'were' muslim in this analogy.. then england would be "muslim" too.. you got facts all sideways..
northern ireland wasn't bombing shit..
and i will repeat.. the IRA were not on a religious campaign.
the IRA was an organisation NOT built along religious lines, but along ANTI UNIONIST lines. that is they were opposed to northern ireland being seperate from the rest of ireland. (and being in a union with england). so the IRA was not "northern irish" as you seem to think.. to back this up further.. there are northern irish catholics who BACK the union. this means there were catholics on BOTH sides of the conflict.
--- End quote ---
geese man, WHEN THE FUCK DID I SAID IRA IS A RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN ? scroll up, re-read my post. anaylze.think.re-think.realize.
--- End quote ---
you were asking why they werent called "christian terrorists"..
the propoganda you posted asked "why were their acts were not attributed to the Christian religion."
the answer has already been posted by me at least 4 or so times now. because the conflict was a non-religious one.
--- End quote ---
so was the somalian civil war, but the Americans turned it into a war aka The Battle of Moghadisu and they called Somalis terrorist. wheres the justice in that ?
J Bananas:
^some people just dont know when to throw in the towel. how unclassy
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version