It's June 16, 2024, 06:58:59 AM
Quote from: Antonio on July 13, 2006, 07:15:13 AMMATERAZZI lost fair play.which part of that do u consider to be fair play?
MATERAZZI lost fair play.
Quote from: Mac 10 on July 13, 2006, 07:17:25 AMQuote from: Antonio on July 13, 2006, 07:15:13 AMMATERAZZI lost fair play.which part of that do u consider to be fair play?Have you seen Del Piero's reaction to Cufrè's punch in a Roma-Juventus from i believe 2 years ago? That's what i call fair play.
In our stadium, every sunday you can hear fans saying "Materazzi son of a bitch". Every fucking game. But Materazzi doesn't react like Zidane.
You can call Materazzi a bastard (he is), a player with no fair play (he is), a provoker (he is), but it's still Zidane who had to be punished.
Rumour has it there are rules that it is not allowed *so therefore illegal, not just "not fair play"* to provoke players with racial slurs on the pitch.
Another rule is that you are not allowed to use video footage in order to make a right decision as a ref during the game. They did, although the FIFA denies it, everyone knows that they did.
IM glad zidane stood up for what e believes.
man it's not that easy to head-butt a stadium full of people.
lol, that is such bullshit.. materazzi got more punished, he got dropped by a legend.now materazzi will be remembered as dude that got zidaned.
QuoteAnother rule is that you are not allowed to use video footage in order to make a right decision as a ref during the game. They did, although the FIFA denies it, everyone knows that they did.This is just speculation. Blatter said they didn't show the header on the big screen, and that the 4th man saw everything. That's why Buffon went to him to make justice (and not to the linesman, for example). I won't comment speculations, when everything looks like they didn't use video footage. It looks like a lie. Like the Frings thing.
Quote from: Antonio on July 13, 2006, 10:26:14 AMQuoteAnother rule is that you are not allowed to use video footage in order to make a right decision as a ref during the game. They did, although the FIFA denies it, everyone knows that they did.This is just speculation. Blatter said they didn't show the header on the big screen, and that the 4th man saw everything. That's why Buffon went to him to make justice (and not to the linesman, for example). I won't comment speculations, when everything looks like they didn't use video footage. It looks like a lie. Like the Frings thing.I'm VERY sure that the 4th man didn't see crap either. He just saw it on the screen or was told. On the replay analysis after the game, they showed hoe the the linesman obviously didn't see SHIT. Then, some authorities, who obviously saw it on screen, ran to the linesman and snitched on Zidane, afterwards, the linesman snitch on Zidane and told it Elizondo. No matter what you say man, I'm 100% convinced that video footage was involved in that decision. That's illegal.
I have a question, in what language were they speaking you think?, lol thats always been so weird for me in soccer matches, how they hell do they speak to eachother?
If they had shown it on the big screen, they would be fucked because then it could've been proven. However it is of course right to send Zidane off, it's still a rule not to use video footage/outside help or whatever you wanna call it. I don't buy the story that the 4th man saw it on the pitch as it happened, that's obviously a lie told by the FIFA. If the linesman didn't see shit, how was the 4th man supposed to see shit? Lmao. Technically, Zidane's headbutt was just a foul that the refs didn't see and therefore there's no red card to be given. It's like when there's an offside the refs don't see and therefore an offside goal is scored, they can't say the goal isn't supposed to count 2 minutes after, because on video it's obvious that it was an offside goal lol. Same with Zidane's headbutt.