Mac 10

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Just like I prefer calling your threads a waste of space.

Yeah it's just like that.

Just like I was wrong by referring to John as a mouse.

Do you know who I am? I'm NEVER wrong.

[Mac 10 †]

I'm NEVER wrong.

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.

5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.

I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.

 

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

I'm NEVER wrong.

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.

5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.

I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.

 

It was an exaggeration smart guy...

Still not wrong.

[Mac 10 †]

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.

Sadly for you, it was the latter. 

Had you said "Your threads never get any replies."  THAT would be an exaggeration.  There is a difference.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.

Sadly for you, it was the latter. 

Had you said "Your threads never get any replies."  THAT would be an exaggeration.  There is a difference.

How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.

[Mac 10 †]

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.

Sadly for you, it was the latter. 

Had you said "Your threads never get any replies."  THAT would be an exaggeration.  There is a difference.

How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.

Of course there is no way I can prove in what kind of tone you said it and what you meant by it.

And whatever I say, of course you can argue the exact opposite.

But I know what you meant and you know what you meant, it's there to be seen.

If you wanna try and squirm out of it on a technicality because it's something that can't be proven either way, be my guest.

It won't change the fact that you were wrong.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument

That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.

Sadly for you, it was the latter. 

Had you said "Your threads never get any replies."  THAT would be an exaggeration.  There is a difference.

How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.

Of course there is no way I can prove in what kind of tone you said it and what you meant by it.

And whatever I say, of course you can argue the exact opposite.

But I know what you meant and you know what you meant, it's there to be seen.

If you wanna try and squirm out of it on a technicality because it's something that can't be proven either way, be my guest.

It won't change the fact that you were wrong.

I didn't really believe an average thread of yours got 0 replies, I didn't actually sit down to do the math, if you're too stupid to see that, then I'm sorry for you...You're the idiot who admittedly squirmed out of the argument by picking at something small and avoiding the main point.

[Boo-Yaa †]

  its clearly a monkey lol

[Noname]

Just split the sport section in football - basketball. Problem solved.

[Boo-Yaa †]

Just split the sport section in football - basketball. Problem solved.

Now_I_Know would still come in and talk shit

[Woozie]

its clearly a monkey lol

I wouldn't say 'clearly'.   

He's got big ears for a monkey and no (visible) tail aswell. 

Could be either. 

[Boo-Yaa †]

its clearly a monkey lol

I wouldn't say 'clearly'.   

He's got big ears for a monkey and no (visible) tail aswell. 

Could be either. 

 : monkey : : monkey_dance2 :

Does that not prove it?


oh and monkeys generally have big ears

[Bomb-A®]

ya NIK this thread made a lot of sense! the only reason ur threads get responses is becoz of the stupidity u tend to blurt out in them and becaoz u love picking fights on petty issues....if u've noticed a lot of the time people aren't contributing to ur thread, they're just asking u to make a little sense and grow up



peace

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

ya NIK this thread made a lot of sense! the only reason ur threads get responses is becoz of the stupidity u tend to blurt out in them and becaoz u love picking fights on petty issues....if u've noticed a lot of the time people aren't contributing to ur thread, they're just asking u to make a little sense and grow up



peace

Thanks for licking my cock, but this thread has made perfect sense. The point was to minimize flooding the front page, understand? My threads get replies because they're topic-worthy (mostly), and people usually have input to add when I open a topic. No need to get your panties wet over it...PeACe

[Mac 10 †]

Thanks for licking my cock, but this thread has made perfect sense. The point was to minimize flooding the front page, understand? My threads get replies because they're topic-worthy (mostly), and people usually have input to add when I open a topic. No need to get your panties wet over it...PeACe

Yeah like this bad boy posted 12 days ago. --> http://www.dubcnn.com/connect/index.php?topic=122287.0

During those 12 quick days, a grand total of 9 people actually entered to even look at the thread.

But I can see how my threads aren't topic-worthy and shit like this is.