Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Andrew Bynum or Dwight Howard?...Who Will End Up The Better Big?

<< < (3/34) > >>

Antonio_:
Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 (:o)

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

R-Tistic:

--- Quote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AM ---Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 (:o)

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

--- End quote ---

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

jeromechickenbone:

--- Quote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AM ---Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 (:o)

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

--- End quote ---

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

--- End quote ---

Shhhhh.  He's trying to skew the numbers as much as possible, don't ruin it. 


--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 01:38:01 AM ---
Both will definitely do their share of dominating, but I honestly believe Andrew Bynum will be the absolute most dominant player in the league when his prime comes...What about ya'll?

--- End quote ---

G never saw that coming ::)

I'd take Howard.  He's more of a proven player and is already doing a lot of dominating.  There's lots of players that have tons of potential that never materialize so I'd go with the one that has already established himself more.

PLANT:

--- Quote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AM ---
--- Quote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AM ---Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)

Points per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 17.6
BYNUM - 19.5

Rebounds per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 14.8
BYNUM - 14.1

Blocks per 48 mins:
HOWARD - 2.4
BYNUM - 4.1 (:o)

Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.

--- End quote ---

Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.

--- End quote ---
no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins.  Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.

Now_Im_Not_Banned:
LOL@Bynum won't be as good as Dwight is now. :-X :-X :-X 7even, you're showing me a new side of you today. Dwight Howard is a physical beast, he's a power player, not a skill player. he has no moves on offense so he relies on his strength, dunks off rebounds, off passes, etc... he still has developing ahead of him. Bynum has the skill-set, the back to the basket game, the blocking ability, the body to dominate opposing centers, and he's only 19 getting Phil Jackson minutes. Do you realize what a failure the Bynum project would be if he didn't even surpass Dwight's current level of play? And as of now, the project is flowing perfectly...You'll remember this in a few years...PeACe

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version