It's May 29, 2024, 12:40:36 AM
Quote from: Don Jacob on January 29, 2007, 03:08:07 PMdid you read my post? i said kobe deserved it more last year....holy moses herschel. also you're talking about how YOU think the mvp should be voted on....you're showing an ignorance to how the mvp is voted upon and has been voted upon for YEARS. yes that's how the MVP is voted upon the the most valuable player to the team with the most impressive record. not the best player in the league, like i said if that was the case jordan would have 10 plus mvps. and it's not about how well nash distributes the ball. it's how well nash fits into the definition the NBA has set up for it's MVP. leader of the suns=steve nashmost impressive record in the league=the pheonix sunsmvp=steve nash .....as of right now, who knows it might change2005/2006leader of the lakers-kobemost impressive record in the league=la lakersmvp should've been kobe....was robbed2004-2005leader of the heat-shaqmost impressive record in the league=miami heatmvp should've been shaq...steve nash DID not deserve it the last two years but he more than deserves it this year. How is the Suns record more impressive than the Lakers record when they played motsly sub-.500 teams and the Lakers had half of their players injured for most of the season so far, including Odom for 21 games and Kwame even more than that...Either way, if the dumbass journalists vote on the MVP based on who they think is most valuable to their team then that doesn't mean they're right, Jake. The MVP is not a team award, it's a league award...And Steve Nash is not MVP (let alone 3-time consecutive MVP) material in my book...PeACe
did you read my post? i said kobe deserved it more last year....holy moses herschel. also you're talking about how YOU think the mvp should be voted on....you're showing an ignorance to how the mvp is voted upon and has been voted upon for YEARS. yes that's how the MVP is voted upon the the most valuable player to the team with the most impressive record. not the best player in the league, like i said if that was the case jordan would have 10 plus mvps. and it's not about how well nash distributes the ball. it's how well nash fits into the definition the NBA has set up for it's MVP. leader of the suns=steve nashmost impressive record in the league=the pheonix sunsmvp=steve nash .....as of right now, who knows it might change2005/2006leader of the lakers-kobemost impressive record in the league=la lakersmvp should've been kobe....was robbed2004-2005leader of the heat-shaqmost impressive record in the league=miami heatmvp should've been shaq...steve nash DID not deserve it the last two years but he more than deserves it this year.
NIK, to be fair, Magic won the MVP 3 times and he was never known for his defense.I'm not saying that Nash is as good as Magic since he isn't but he's the closest thing to Magic in the game today. Kobe should have won last year but it's not like Nash didn't earn it and Nash is playing even better this year. For a guard to shoot over 50% from the field is astonishing. He made a scrub like Tim Thomas a multimillionaire.