It's June 15, 2024, 03:30:00 PM
I disagree, I see his ideas as valid as the next man's but I do disagree I think the title is perfectly concise.and kdub, yes the official title is 2001, but it's perfectly clear dre intended to communicate 'the chronic 2001' with the title/coverand no people are not preoccupied with the aesthetics of the record more than the music, it's 7-8 years later and this discussion happens. You can be goddamn sure the music has been discussed in the course of those 7-8 years.and for the record, packaging and covers and titles are part of the artistic statement, so it's legit as fuck to discuss.-T
Quote from: Tanjibility-The West Coast Rap Amnesiac on February 23, 2007, 01:10:14 AMI disagree, I see his ideas as valid as the next man's but I do disagree I think the title is perfectly concise.and kdub, yes the official title is 2001, but it's perfectly clear dre intended to communicate 'the chronic 2001' with the title/coverand no people are not preoccupied with the aesthetics of the record more than the music, it's 7-8 years later and this discussion happens. You can be goddamn sure the music has been discussed in the course of those 7-8 years.and for the record, packaging and covers and titles are part of the artistic statement, so it's legit as fuck to discuss.-TI'm with u on that man