It's May 16, 2024, 09:48:05 AM
I think Troy Smith is a good college quarterback.
Lamont might get cut hes due like 5.5 mill this season
Quote from: Don Jacob on February 22, 2007, 12:16:18 PMgood f brooks he was going no where fast with the ball. hopefully we don't pull a houston and not take what we need in the draft. A Matt Millen is more like it. I heard some people are saying Oakland should get Calvin Johnson. Some were saying that and pick up Troy Smith later in the draft. I am not feeling that move at all.
good f brooks he was going no where fast with the ball. hopefully we don't pull a houston and not take what we need in the draft.
JaMonster baby. btw this should go in the offseason news and notes section buddy.
Quote from: d-nice on February 22, 2007, 12:19:39 PMQuote from: Don Jacob on February 22, 2007, 12:16:18 PMgood f brooks he was going no where fast with the ball. hopefully we don't pull a houston and not take what we need in the draft. A Matt Millen is more like it. I heard some people are saying Oakland should get Calvin Johnson. Some were saying that and pick up Troy Smith later in the draft. I am not feeling that move at all.Calvin Johnson is gonna be special IMO, but the Raiders need a QB bad.
How did they make the QB situation worse? This means they will draft a QB. If they were to keep Brooks they would be wasting 5 mil in cap space. If they happen to let the rookie QB (Russel, or Quinn) sit the year, it would be better to let the younger QB (Walter) get the playing time instead of an old, more expensive Brooks.
Quote from: Lunatic 63 on February 22, 2007, 11:49:42 AMgood decision. i personally think this guy is horrible. with aaron brooks, this team has a chance of MAYBE what? 5-6 wins? why take another year in the hole 4? start over NOW, with the jamonster.Yeah whats wrong with 5-6 wins? What if JaMarcus isnt ready? I am all for rebulding but you can still be semi productive while you rebuild, start Brooks and WHENEVER Russell is ready start him. So do you just want to throw him in the fire? Even the Niners gave Smith 6 or 7 games to watch before he started i think the Raiders should do the same. Russell does not rtead covergaes well enuff yet to start in the NFL. Athelticism can only take you so far he has to develop. Andrew Walter will COST the Raiders games. Brooks is def better.
good decision. i personally think this guy is horrible. with aaron brooks, this team has a chance of MAYBE what? 5-6 wins? why take another year in the hole 4? start over NOW, with the jamonster.
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on February 22, 2007, 02:27:46 PMQuote from: Lunatic 63 on February 22, 2007, 11:49:42 AMgood decision. i personally think this guy is horrible. with aaron brooks, this team has a chance of MAYBE what? 5-6 wins? why take another year in the hole 4? start over NOW, with the jamonster.Yeah whats wrong with 5-6 wins? What if JaMarcus isnt ready? I am all for rebulding but you can still be semi productive while you rebuild, start Brooks and WHENEVER Russell is ready start him. So do you just want to throw him in the fire? Even the Niners gave Smith 6 or 7 games to watch before he started i think the Raiders should do the same. Russell does not rtead covergaes well enuff yet to start in the NFL. Athelticism can only take you so far he has to develop. Andrew Walter will COST the Raiders games. Brooks is def better.i'm sorry. i forget not every rookie QB can be a Vince Young
The raiders will have both moss and porter at the start of the year. they will draft JaMonster all will be good in the town come sept.