Lifestyle > Train of Thought

John Howard Comes under criticism

<< < (2/2)

virtuoso:
So if someone has TB then they should be allowed into the country where they can infect more people then?
If someone has hepatitis they should be allowed to stroll right into the country?
If a white person is the one looking to migrate, then suddenly it's no longer racism, but purely xenophobic then is it?
Don't the people of the nation deserve any kind of protection?
Where is the morality in exposing people to new strains of disease which originated from the third world?
Have you never stopped to ask yourself who ultimately gains from this? i.e. the pharmaceutical oligopoly
Is it not apparent to you by now, that when a new strain or new disease enters the country, it then spreads like wildfire because the people in that western country then contract it and then spread it even further when they are the ones holidaying?
Don't you realise that the way you contain a disease, is to limit it's exposure?
Furthermore do you really think these aid agencies (i mean the people at the very top of them) give a shit about these immigrants if so then then why is it they are giving them vaccines which they know to be potentially deadly? and yes i am well aware this is happening inside of europe and the western world also
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/ before you comment upon the last question read that article in it's entireity


AndrE16686:

--- Quote from: Chief on April 15, 2007, 03:00:20 AM ---if he banned peeps with HIV completely, then that would deserve criticism..

--- End quote ---

fasho, they are still human, refugees who been raped, HIV children, etc.

its bad enuff u gonna die, but if the govt were to make you live in misery for the rest of your shortened ife span like with a star of david on your shirt.


Remember Jesus and the lepers yall.

Suffice:

--- Quote from: Loco is tha motion... on April 15, 2007, 07:24:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chief on April 15, 2007, 03:00:20 AM ---if he banned peeps with HIV completely, then that would deserve criticism..

--- End quote ---

fasho, they are still human, refugees who been raped, HIV children, etc.

its bad enuff u gonna die, but if the govt were to make you live in misery for the rest of your shortened ife span like with a star of david on your shirt.


Remember Jesus and the lepers yall.

--- End quote ---

true, but at the same time, the way to contain something like HIV, would be to quarantine it. Of course, HIV isn't physically apparent at first, so that makes it a whole lot harder to deal with, but If, say, all people with a certain disease are contained in one area, they can't spread it. Pretty clear and simple, and the policy makes perfect sense to me

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version