Lifestyle > Train of Thought
9/11 conspiracy theorists are wrong - bring on the science!
Sparegeez:
--- Quote from: Knuckles on September 11, 2007, 04:10:56 PM ---Only a nutjob would believe that something other than the airplanes were responsible for bringing the buildings down.
--- End quote ---
My history teacher believed it LOL.
Laconic:
--- Quote from: virtuoso on September 11, 2007, 11:44:25 AM ---
Ah yes, very ordinary, if fire could bring down a building which was built to withstand attacks from aircraft, insurance companies would refuse to provide protection.
Building 7 was not struck by any aircraft and was instead hit by debris, yet other buildings in much closer viscinity to the towers were also struck and though sustained damage, the integrity of the structure held up to the impact.
The firefighters said there are bombs in the building everyone get out.
Bring on the science? ah so when respected architects and engineers cast doubt on how the towers fell, they to become conspiracy theorists do they?
Did you even know that up until very recently when the original blueprints were released publicly, no one was talking about the 20 central core columns, after all, it kind of upset the clear cut explanation.
What kind of collapse, brings forth an almighty ploom of smoke, so huge and powerful that it rockets down the streets far and beyond the immediate area.
What kind of collapse literally throws bodies onto the surrounding roofs?
I notice to how the new "official explanations" continue to contradict the previous one, for a long time they were happy to stick to the concept of a pancake collapse, however this can be deemed to be either shoddy investigation or evil deceit. This is because when you use the pancake collapse theory calculation, it would still have to taken much longer for the buillding to collapse than what actually occurred.
People know full well that many respected figures in the construction industry question the official story and people realise that popular mechanics is run by a guy whose first cousin is Michael Chertoff and is a part of the Hearst Publishing Group nuff said.
--- End quote ---
WTC 1 & 2 had 47 massive core columns and 240 perimeter columns.
WTC 7 had around 25 core and 58 perimeter columns.
Apparently this guy forgot to mention the pools of molten metal underneath WTC 1, 2, and 7 weeks later when, in fact, the maximum temp in the towers was 1500 degrees, about half the temp to melt steel. Either which way the Conservation of Momentum does not allow a progressive collapse of that nature. Not to mention the buildings were designed to take 2 plane wrecks and hurricanes without collapse.
How about Larry Silverstein admitting that WTC 7 was demolished?
How about the 20 second countdown over the frequency radios before the collapse?
How about all the firefighter testimony?
How about that new Zogby poll just released saying 51% of Americans want a new independent investigation with 67% saying look into Bush and Cheney specifically?
Just like these bullshit ass Bin Laden tapes, it's about timing.
The perpetrators are very worried and they should be.
I with you Virtuoso. People have no idea.
boycriedwolf619:
9/11 Inside Job (sick ass song) - http://www.zshare.net/audio/3602845feb87b7/
Shallow:
If I was a billionaire I'd find some land in the middle of nowhere, rebuild the towers exactly as they were built and the have planes flown into them. Just to see what happens.
boycriedwolf619:
--- Quote from: Shallow on September 12, 2007, 06:06:15 AM ---If I was a billionaire I'd find some land in the middle of nowhere, rebuild the towers exactly as they were built and the have planes flown into them. Just to see what happens.
--- End quote ---
I like the way you think props 1+
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version