Author Topic: 2001 is NOT a classic  (Read 2647 times)

Cliftone_Santiago_909

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1504
  • Karma: 2
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #90 on: July 16, 2001, 08:41:10 PM »

Quote

i can live with the fact that you don't like it, i ain't tryin to force it down your throat like mashed potatoes


but just cuz you don't consider it a classic and a shit loads of other people do doesn't make it a non classic


   EXACTLY! I haven't jumped in this thread yet but for real..... you can't deny Chronic 2001. You can go ahead and say that you dont like it.... but when you got millions of muthafuckers praising it (some who aint even into rap) and it's getting nominated for grammies...... you can't deny it.

    And it's not that the people who praise Chronic 2001 are Dr Dre "Dickriders".... it's just that the rest of you are straight HATERS!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ImmortalOne

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1728
  • Karma: 12
  • mothafuckin made niggaz
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #91 on: July 16, 2001, 09:13:01 PM »
Quote



   EXACTLY! I haven't jumped in this thread yet but for real..... you can't deny Chronic 2001. You can go ahead and say that you dont like it.... but when you got millions of muthafuckers praising it (some who aint even into rap) and it's getting nominated for grammies...... you can't deny it.

    And it's not that the people who praise Chronic 2001 are Dr Dre "Dickriders".... it's just that the rest of you are straight HATERS!


Well, I can make the same arguement for all the people who hate on Art Of War.....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Siberian_Wolf

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
  • Karma: 0
  • FREE OL DIRTY!!!
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #92 on: July 16, 2001, 09:22:25 PM »
I GUESS U MOTHERFUCKERS WONT SHUT UP UNTIL DRE AND BONE THUGGS DO A COLLABO ALBUM 2GETHER. CALM DOWN!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Don Jacob

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 13827
  • Karma: -136
  • don status, bitch
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #93 on: July 16, 2001, 09:29:43 PM »
u can't say the same for art of war cuz 1. it's not critically acclaimed 2. every bone fan i know thinks that album is their worst 3. there's more people who don't like it than do
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

littlesnoopdogg

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Karma: 0
  • I love YaBB 1 Gold!
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #94 on: July 16, 2001, 10:31:34 PM »
OK, you dont' sell as much as 2001 did, and not be considered at least a damn near classic in your style of music. The fact it's not a near classic is because of what was already mentioned. The critics and non rap fans loved it.

I'm a huge Bone fan. I've got all 5 group cd's, both of bizzy's, Flesh's 1st, Krayzie's, and all Mo Thugs.
Art of War has alot of good stuff, but some bad stuff. I'd consider Eternal a classic. Hell, I like both collections more than either disc on AOW. I feel AOW ain't near  a classic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

cremedelaclem

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1505
  • Karma: 3
  • aka Mike T.V..... aka OsKa sWiNdLa      .............. .."Lifes a bitch and then you die"...
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #95 on: July 17, 2001, 04:53:26 AM »
the official cremdelaclem list of classic and near classic hip hop albums

classic - the chronic

           doggystyle

           paid in full

           e.eternal
 
            efil4zaggin

           liquid swords

            36 chambers

             only built....

             legends

              illmatic

            midnight marauders

             peoples instinctive travels....

             fresh mode ep
   
              slim shady lp
 
              soundbombing 2

               aquemini

                2001

                amerikkas most wanted

                the diary

                regulate





near classics -  supreme clientele

                     atliens

                      stankonia

                       hell on earth
   
                       streetz is a...

                        dogg food
           
                        reasonable doubt
 
                        lifestyles ov the poor and dangerous

                       3 feet high and rising

                        the weight

                         lyricist lounge 1

                          cypress hill

                           ironman
 
                         at the speed of life

                           balance and options
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

cremedelaclem

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1505
  • Karma: 3
  • aka Mike T.V..... aka OsKa sWiNdLa      .............. .."Lifes a bitch and then you die"...
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #96 on: July 17, 2001, 04:56:07 AM »
i forgot these

classic - ready to die

near classic - life after death

                  no way out
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

RapAce

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 165
  • Karma: 0
  • R.A
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #97 on: July 17, 2001, 04:59:15 AM »
So like if we all voted wuld it be classic or nonclassic...?

I say classic  8)

Peace
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Rud

  • Kingdingaling
  • Connected
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 20161
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Karma: 1037
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #98 on: July 17, 2001, 05:06:13 AM »
CLASSIC!

2001 - PEOPLE WILL LOOK AT THIS AND LEARN SOMETHING FROM IT

AS I SED EARLIER THERE IS A CLASSIC ALBUM RELEASED EVERY YEAR SO EACH YEAR SOMETHING NEW COMES ALONG AND SOME PEOPLE WILL TAKE STUFF IDEAS OFF IT

AND THE FANS JUST

BENEFIT!


peace
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #99 on: July 17, 2001, 09:55:31 AM »
Crem, you forgot "Death Certificate" and "Eazy-Duz-It"...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Rud

  • Kingdingaling
  • Connected
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 20161
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Karma: 1037
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #100 on: July 17, 2001, 10:00:51 AM »
100TH!

WOW THIS HAS BECOME A LONG TOPIC YET STILL STAYED RELEVENT!


peace
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

techniec

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #101 on: July 17, 2001, 10:05:05 AM »
hey!!!!!!!!

my post has 100 replies ;D

keep the arguments going, i wanna catch up to that 7 page "is there any euro gangsta rap" post ;D

i still say it aint a classic, cuz there are 3-4 tracks that are shit which is too much, but for me its too close
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Sikotic™

Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #102 on: July 17, 2001, 01:49:12 PM »
Quote
the diary


I thought I was the only one who thought The Diary was a classic. Good to see I'm not.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ImmortalOne

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1728
  • Karma: 12
  • mothafuckin made niggaz
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #103 on: July 17, 2001, 01:52:06 PM »
Quote

u can't say the same for art of war cuz 1. it's not critically acclaimed 2. every bone fan i know thinks that album is their worst 3. there's more people who don't like it than do


Critically acclaimed status doesnt mean jack shit. I judge the album by the content, not critical status. And my ears tell me Art Of War is a better album than 2001.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ZILLA THA GOODFELLA

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 6917
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: -97
  • www.servnu151.com + www.turfdout.com
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #104 on: July 17, 2001, 01:52:40 PM »
IS THIS DA BIGGEST TOPIC YALL EVER HAD OR WHAT????????????? ??? ???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »