Lifestyle > Train of Thought
I officially predict Ron Paul wont' win a fucking thing
J @ M @ L:
--- Quote from: Tommy Fits >>> cali on January 06, 2008, 08:25:13 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ron Paul = greatest American since Thomas Jefferson on January 06, 2008, 05:15:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: 7even is the next Iwan Karamasow on January 06, 2008, 03:35:48 PM ---^Why are you so sure that he would take away significantly more Republican votes, when running as an independent? I'm sure a lot of "democrats" are going to vote for him, too.
Btw how's that Giuliani bastard doing, ain't nobody talking bout him?
--- End quote ---
Paul got about 3x as many votes as Rudy in Iowa, which is amazing because the neocons there love the idea of killing muslims. Have you seen his new campaign ad? It's probably the most disgusting thing I've seen in a long time.
--- End quote ---
I saw his ad and it was one of the most fucked up things I have ever seen in a while. Like I said before if you think Bush is a war monger. Rudy will make him look like a peace loving hippie. Rudy is evil. Life long New Yorkers know the deal with him. They know he will be worse then Bush.
--- End quote ---
Trauma-san:
--- Quote from: Ron Paul = greatest American since Thomas Jefferson on January 06, 2008, 05:12:24 PM ---
When congress gets together and comes up with various budgets, say $500 Billion allocated to various projects and municipalities across the country. Ron vetoes, stating it is entirely too much money. Well, Ron is grossly outnumbered and the decision is final - There will be $500 Billion allocated. The next question is - Where? Well guess what, if the question is no longer "how much" but "where", Ron is going to step up and fight for his constituents to get their tax dollars back. Can your feeble mind grasp that concept or do I need to go below a 5th grader comprehension level for you?
Ron ran as a Libertarian in 1988. That's the extent of his party affiliation. He has been in the House as a Republican for 20 straight years, keeping his seat while many Repubs were ousted. Reagan endorsed Ron Paul numerous times.
Paul's current platform of small governement, non-interventionist foreign policy, and decreased spending is the EXACT forum Bush ran under in 2000. The difference being that your idol, George Bush is a corporate lobbyist whore and he lied his way to the top. Paul isn't going to do that.
And again, you're a giant gaping pussy because you support the person who you perceive has the best chance to win. You have no opinion or independant thought, you let a faceless mindless majority dictate your thought process. I feel sorry for your mother.
And I thought you picked winners dipshit? In case you didn't notice, Obama fucked Hillary up in Iowa and he's set to do it again in New Hampshire. I mean, even when you try to pick the person that you think everyone else is gonna pick, you lose. Which further emphasizes my earlier statement that I'd bet you lose regularly in life.
--- End quote ---
You just confirmed everything I was saying. Ron Paul on record is against tax spending, but makes sure to get his portion of it. Hypocrite.
George Bush isn't my idol. I just like making bitches like you get pissed. God Bless George Bush!
Ron Paul, like I said, doesn't run as a libertarian because he cannot win as a libertarian. So he runs where he can win; as a republican. You're chiding me for voting for people that *can* win, when you're idol runs his entire political career in the wrong party because it's the only way he can get elected.
The Hillary thing was a joke, only you're too intellectually devoid to get it. Nearly everybody else on the entire messageboard caught it immediately... as it was intended.
By the way; has Ron won anything yet? So, basically, I'm still right, and you're still wrong, correct?
Machiavelli:
--- Quote from: Trauma-san on January 06, 2008, 08:52:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ron Paul = greatest American since Thomas Jefferson on January 06, 2008, 05:12:24 PM ---
When congress gets together and comes up with various budgets, say $500 Billion allocated to various projects and municipalities across the country. Ron vetoes, stating it is entirely too much money. Well, Ron is grossly outnumbered and the decision is final - There will be $500 Billion allocated. The next question is - Where? Well guess what, if the question is no longer "how much" but "where", Ron is going to step up and fight for his constituents to get their tax dollars back. Can your feeble mind grasp that concept or do I need to go below a 5th grader comprehension level for you?
Ron ran as a Libertarian in 1988. That's the extent of his party affiliation. He has been in the House as a Republican for 20 straight years, keeping his seat while many Repubs were ousted. Reagan endorsed Ron Paul numerous times.
Paul's current platform of small governement, non-interventionist foreign policy, and decreased spending is the EXACT forum Bush ran under in 2000. The difference being that your idol, George Bush is a corporate lobbyist whore and he lied his way to the top. Paul isn't going to do that.
And again, you're a giant gaping pussy because you support the person who you perceive has the best chance to win. You have no opinion or independant thought, you let a faceless mindless majority dictate your thought process. I feel sorry for your mother.
And I thought you picked winners dipshit? In case you didn't notice, Obama fucked Hillary up in Iowa and he's set to do it again in New Hampshire. I mean, even when you try to pick the person that you think everyone else is gonna pick, you lose. Which further emphasizes my earlier statement that I'd bet you lose regularly in life.
--- End quote ---
You just confirmed everything I was saying. Ron Paul on record is against tax spending, but makes sure to get his portion of it. Hypocrite.
George Bush isn't my idol. I just like making bitches like you get pissed. God Bless George Bush!
Ron Paul, like I said, doesn't run as a libertarian because he cannot win as a libertarian. So he runs where he can win; as a republican. You're chiding me for voting for people that *can* win, when you're idol runs his entire political career in the wrong party because it's the only way he can get elected.
The Hillary thing was a joke, only you're too intellectually devoid to get it. Nearly everybody else on the entire messageboard caught it immediately... as it was intended.
By the way; has Ron won anything yet? So, basically, I'm still right, and you're still wrong, correct?
--- End quote ---
republican is just a party...you can be liberal, liberaltarian, moderate, conservative w.e...he's just a liberatarian slanted republican
Trauma-san:
No. He doesn't subscribe to Republican politics, he subscribes to Libertarian Politics. He's ran as a libertarian, but the label libertarian tips everybody off that you're ineffective, so he changed his political affiliation to Republican, in order to be able to win votes.
The dumbass above is chiding me for voting for someone who has the potential to win. Ron Paul changes his entire political affiliation based on his potential to win.
Elevz:
As for Ron Paul not winning 'a fucking thing'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_Republican_caucuses%2C_2008#Results_of_the_January_2008_caucuses
What's the yellow area doing on that map? ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version