Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Ron Paul just stoled my money
Teddy Roosevelt:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on January 07, 2008, 02:35:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: They call me Ted on January 07, 2008, 02:03:10 PM ---I don't even need to create a new post. ;D
--- Quote from: They call me Ted on January 04, 2008, 11:48:31 PM ---Don't be stupid. He released 2 TV commercials in the past week. Have you seen his appearance on Bill Mayer? Paul draws great bipartisan support. Now personally I think he can run his campaign better, but just because one thinks that way, doesn't make the candidate a con man.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
he is not even trying... going from city to city. NH should be his, it's the Live Free or Die state, there is no way in hell he wins off two commercials, John Edwards is about the same in money and he went balls out in Iowa. Paul should have been doing to same in NH. NH would take to him over Huckabee, and Romney, and he'd truly keep McCain down. The other Republicans should be skipping NH, and saying I'll try another state. But Paul dropped the ball, he wouldn't even win his home state of Texas. Ron Paul has a Dennis Kucinich chance in hell of winning, and he stole all your money. He ain't spending it, his keeping it, and that will pay his kids college loans.
I said he almost stole my money, but I gave it to Obama instead.
--- End quote ---
You did not say he almost stole your money, you said he stole your money (actually you said he stoled you money).
All TV ads, all aired in New Hampshire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XtI3RnZvV0I
http://youtube.com/watch?v=k0_ZCEc9bi8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=30yxHqSUva8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4AmY-fW3gdc
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ENfMexgorp4
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WWes9BP5va8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2T-iJKwskH4
And radio ads aired in New Hampshire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=olMKgj4tiJI
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZU614yBacV4
http://youtube.com/watch?v=tq_HDValyCs
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sG0oFRGwZEA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=olMKgj4tiJI
http://youtube.com/watch?v=VkPUeFtLrPM
So how credible are you, a man who lives in California & supports Obama, in saying Ron Paul isn't spending enough money in New Hampshire? Is 7 TV ads and 6 radio ads enough for you? And John Edwards is putting in so much money, but he is banking on winning and having more supporters give him more money. Ron Paul got most his money in the late/mid part of the 4th quarter of 2007. It takes time to put together ads and promotions. Paul is guaranteed to have advertisement money all the way through Super Tuesday. John Edwards is spending all his money cause he knows he won't have enough through Super Tuesday and is hoping he can gain enough support for people to donate more money to him. He is taking a huge risk.
Primo:
He is campaigning hard in NH and it looks like Ron Paul owns a real estate company up there. There is alot of signs. I am actually a precinct captain for the Paul campaign.
jeromechickenbone:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on January 07, 2008, 10:07:50 AM ---Almost... I was going to donate my money, but then I realized that he didn't want to win, so I gave it to Obama instead.
Ron Paul has only raised about 2million less that John Edwards, but Edwards is going for broke where as Paul is going for... well, I have no idea. Paul should have focued on NH, and he would have won in the state that gave birth to Ronald Reagan. They love Libertarians, they would love Ron Paul. But Paul is not campaigning, his not visiting all the cities, his not putting out all the ads needed to win. Paul has the money, he does not have the drive.
--- End quote ---
lol @ this entire post.
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: They call me Ted on January 07, 2008, 03:23:03 PM ---
So how credible are you, a man who lives in California & supports Obama, in saying Ron Paul isn't spending enough money in New Hampshire? Is 7 TV ads and 6 radio ads enough for you? And John Edwards is putting in so much money, but he is banking on winning and having more supporters give him more money. Ron Paul got most his money in the late/mid part of the 4th quarter of 2007. It takes time to put together ads and promotions. Paul is guaranteed to have advertisement money all the way through Super Tuesday. John Edwards is spending all his money cause he knows he won't have enough through Super Tuesday and is hoping he can gain enough support for people to donate more money to him. He is taking a huge risk.
--- End quote ---
Actually I live in Minnesota right now. And of course that's next to Iowa, and there has been some campaigners here. It's like they are in Iowa so they stop here for a day and have a speech in Minneapolis, or a fundraiser in St. Paul. I have heard from all the top tier candidates but no Ron Paul. Ron Paul has spend less than 50% of what his raising, the lowest of any candidate. John Edwards is running 3rd in NH, and he has a 36hr straight stratigy. Paul is not doing any of this. His laying back and hoping to get a deligate here and there... well Huckabee and Romney are actually getting all the attention.
If I truly wanted to slam Paul, I'd post his racist articles, but instead I decided to mention that his been outspend and out campaigned by John McCain even though he has WAY more in his campaign bank. Paul's only hope is to wait until Florida where Rudy is waiting, and their is doubt he'll carry Texas. Paul is going to lose. His the Dennis Kucinich of the Republicans, he ain't going to win, the extremist like him but honestly if he was president we'd be fucked.
virtuoso:
Ffs Obama is a neocon he does belong to the CFR and Ron Paul has written no racist articles. You are referring to comments which were made by a staff member who was forced to resign after that. Critical thinking amigo! if Ron Paul was actually a racist, then Fox News, the Fox News who barred a top tier candidate from their debate, would have been all over this. They have no ammunition against Ron Paul which is why instead they come out with bullshit simplistic propaganda like oh you think Ron Paul cares about black people when voted against federal funding for the aftermath of the katrina disaster. In fact he voted against federal funding because it would be swallowed up by the beaurocracy. It's not like there are no precedents set for his fears of that scenario, anyone remember where all those billions pledged to Iraq disappeared to? no? it seems the politicians can't either and that is the point!.
By the way referring to what you said about Ron Paul on the other thread mocking him being described as a top tier candidate his opinion ratings are witnessing a strong consistent climb, he was voted 5th in iowa, he is tied third with guliani in new hampshire and las vegas money is being staked heavily on Ron Paul.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version