Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Where's the Ron Paul People??
jeromechickenbone:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 10, 2008, 08:40:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Eleven 2 Three on February 10, 2008, 03:41:16 AM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 09, 2008, 11:19:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: west coa$t on February 09, 2008, 10:48:35 PM ---I'm not into politics at all and it makes me sick
but I do know that Huckabeeeee wants to change the Constitution so fuck that guy
I feel sorry for all you wasting time with these liars and cons
if Ron Paul is a con then what the fuck are all the other politicians? haha
--- End quote ---
politicians... which are cons with a better chance of winning than Ron Paul. Paul is still a politician too... which is why he just JACKED all that money... and is about to pull out the race, no go 3rd party and he just secured his congressional set with that money. So Paul knew what he was doing all along. He JACKED you guys, and is keeping his congressional seat.
--- End quote ---
I don't think anyone funded Ron Paul's campaign on the assumption that he would become president. And how has he jacked peoples money when he used that money to spread a message successfully? And if he decides to run as a third party candidate, he might have a better chance of getting some focus on him now that he got some shine as a Republican. If people don't approve of either of the Republican and Democratic candidates, they'll have something to choose. Thanks to Ron Paul being in the race for becoming the Republican nominee, people may actually notice him this time around. It's not even about becoming the 44th president of the United States. Thanks to Ron Paul there's a chance the 45th will be better. That's where the money went. Is that so hard to grasp?
--- End quote ---
read Ralph Nader 2000. All he wanted was the Green Party to gain 5% of the vote to be seen nationally as a major party, hoping that would open a 2004 bid. On top of that Paul is 72, in 2012 he'll be 76, that's OLD. And the issues he brought up has always been there, but no we think... oh his making it larger. Just like the Green in 2000, within 8 years, you guys will move on and become either traditional Republicans or straight up Libertarian.
--- End quote ---
I know your new favorite thing is to say that Paul is Ralph Nader. Great. How are they similar philosophically?
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: Ron Paul = greatest American since Thomas Jefferson on February 10, 2008, 10:13:20 AM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 10, 2008, 08:40:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Eleven 2 Three on February 10, 2008, 03:41:16 AM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 09, 2008, 11:19:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: west coa$t on February 09, 2008, 10:48:35 PM ---I'm not into politics at all and it makes me sick
but I do know that Huckabeeeee wants to change the Constitution so fuck that guy
I feel sorry for all you wasting time with these liars and cons
if Ron Paul is a con then what the fuck are all the other politicians? haha
--- End quote ---
politicians... which are cons with a better chance of winning than Ron Paul. Paul is still a politician too... which is why he just JACKED all that money... and is about to pull out the race, no go 3rd party and he just secured his congressional set with that money. So Paul knew what he was doing all along. He JACKED you guys, and is keeping his congressional seat.
--- End quote ---
I don't think anyone funded Ron Paul's campaign on the assumption that he would become president. And how has he jacked peoples money when he used that money to spread a message successfully? And if he decides to run as a third party candidate, he might have a better chance of getting some focus on him now that he got some shine as a Republican. If people don't approve of either of the Republican and Democratic candidates, they'll have something to choose. Thanks to Ron Paul being in the race for becoming the Republican nominee, people may actually notice him this time around. It's not even about becoming the 44th president of the United States. Thanks to Ron Paul there's a chance the 45th will be better. That's where the money went. Is that so hard to grasp?
--- End quote ---
read Ralph Nader 2000. All he wanted was the Green Party to gain 5% of the vote to be seen nationally as a major party, hoping that would open a 2004 bid. On top of that Paul is 72, in 2012 he'll be 76, that's OLD. And the issues he brought up has always been there, but no we think... oh his making it larger. Just like the Green in 2000, within 8 years, you guys will move on and become either traditional Republicans or straight up Libertarian.
--- End quote ---
I know your new favorite thing is to say that Paul is Ralph Nader. Great. How are they similar philosophically?
--- End quote ---
Same extreme following, with the same extreme politics, just different sides of the extreme. Same old shit, just a different year. Only difference, Ralph Nader DIDN'T QUIT.
jeromechickenbone:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 10, 2008, 10:19:39 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ron Paul = greatest American since Thomas Jefferson on February 10, 2008, 10:13:20 AM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 10, 2008, 08:40:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Eleven 2 Three on February 10, 2008, 03:41:16 AM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 09, 2008, 11:19:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: west coa$t on February 09, 2008, 10:48:35 PM ---I'm not into politics at all and it makes me sick
but I do know that Huckabeeeee wants to change the Constitution so fuck that guy
I feel sorry for all you wasting time with these liars and cons
if Ron Paul is a con then what the fuck are all the other politicians? haha
--- End quote ---
politicians... which are cons with a better chance of winning than Ron Paul. Paul is still a politician too... which is why he just JACKED all that money... and is about to pull out the race, no go 3rd party and he just secured his congressional set with that money. So Paul knew what he was doing all along. He JACKED you guys, and is keeping his congressional seat.
--- End quote ---
I don't think anyone funded Ron Paul's campaign on the assumption that he would become president. And how has he jacked peoples money when he used that money to spread a message successfully? And if he decides to run as a third party candidate, he might have a better chance of getting some focus on him now that he got some shine as a Republican. If people don't approve of either of the Republican and Democratic candidates, they'll have something to choose. Thanks to Ron Paul being in the race for becoming the Republican nominee, people may actually notice him this time around. It's not even about becoming the 44th president of the United States. Thanks to Ron Paul there's a chance the 45th will be better. That's where the money went. Is that so hard to grasp?
--- End quote ---
read Ralph Nader 2000. All he wanted was the Green Party to gain 5% of the vote to be seen nationally as a major party, hoping that would open a 2004 bid. On top of that Paul is 72, in 2012 he'll be 76, that's OLD. And the issues he brought up has always been there, but no we think... oh his making it larger. Just like the Green in 2000, within 8 years, you guys will move on and become either traditional Republicans or straight up Libertarian.
--- End quote ---
I know your new favorite thing is to say that Paul is Ralph Nader. Great. How are they similar philosophically?
--- End quote ---
Same extreme following, with the same extreme politics, just different sides of the extreme. Same old shit, just a different year. Only difference, Ralph Nader DIDN'T QUIT.
--- End quote ---
LOL, in no way is that an arguement to them being similar philosophically. Do you understand what my question was?
And if you took time to seek info out rather than watching Fox News, you'd quickly (well hopefully) realize that Paul hasn't quit. It sounds like you're in extreme denial.
You know you don't want Paul to drop out. You need him to be relevant so people bother responding to you. Shit is disgusting.
Elevz:
I'm confused. Why is that? What on earth has Ralph Nader got to do with Ron Paul? They campaign differently, their ideas show very little similarities and erm... There's basically nothing to compare the two, except that they're borth outsiders looking for change.
--- Quote from: M Dogg on February 10, 2008, 08:40:28 AM ---Just like the Green in 2000, within 8 years, you guys will move on and become either traditional Republicans or straight up Libertarian.
--- End quote ---
What makes you think 'we' aren't yet?
Javier:
M Dogg never stated that they are ideologically similar. He said, "Same extreme following, with the same extreme politics, just different sides of the extreme." Extreme isn't the right word there, but he's saying it's a similar small following just on the opposite side of the political spectrum.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version