Lifestyle > Tha G-Spot

Board Discussion:Is US justified in attacking.....

(1/6) > >>

techniec:
Iraq??

they have no connection to terrorism
they are not a threat to the US...


whats the deal??

is thousands of deaths "collateral damage" so u can settle an old score, Mr. Bush?

DeaDSouLjaH:
hmm ..well i certainly dont think they are justified in attacking the Iraq , first of all they havent proved that saddam hussein does possess unconventional weapons or weapons of mass destruction .  And they United States just want to topple the saddam government  for their own selfish needs without looking at all the further pain and suffering to the iraqi people who are just sitting ducks with a government that terrorizes them and now a superpower who wants to topple that government. I think the United States has done more than required in Iraq  , imposing sanctions has greatly affected this poverty stricken country and children are dying by the day. The US has no right to attack Iraq unless it proves that saddam hussein possesses such weapons and they should devise a plan to asssasinate him and neednt attack da country!!

these are my views on this very controversial topic..
pz

Jamal420:
i'm totally with the U.S. in their efforts against terrorism, but to attack entire countries and kill all the innocent people????.....no i don't agree with that
in case you guys don't know the main reason....the reason they don't tell you about......why the U.S. is in afghanistan is for oil and so they can have control over the region (china,russia,pakistan,and india)
when afghanistan fought russia 20 years ago the U.S. aided them and helped them defeat the russians. guess who else was fightin on the side of afghanistan and who else the U.S. was backin up???????.....good old Osama
the U.S. helped finance the war against russia but once the war was over the country was destroyed, and the U.S. jus got the fuck outta there without helpin the people or helpin them reconstruct
but if greedy U.S. needs somethin like for example osama bin laden.....they will do anythin to get what they want....all the money they r spendin now could have been saved if they would have spent half of it 20 years ago

back to the topic......DONT YOU THINK THE U.S. HAS THE RESOURCES TO JUS GO IN THERE AND GET WHAT THEY WANT WITHOUT KILLING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT VICTIMS??????...........u know why they would never do that??????......because a couple soldiers might die........one soldier is probably worth more to this country than thousands of innocent civilians jus because the soldier is american

also......if the U.S. wanted to help bring peace to the middle east.......why r they providin Israel with weapons.....this year they r thinking about givin them $1.2 bilion in military aid.....dont u think thas kind of a lot of money to be goin out of our tax dollars to help support killings of people

the U.S. always plays the double standard.....when Israel was fightin (i forgot who against....but a country in the middle east....possibly Iran) the U.S. was selling weapons to BOTH countries

so.....to answer your question.....the U.S. is not justified to do whatever they r doin and plannin to do......and Bush thinks that he can do whatever he wants.....he can and has the power to.........but is it right?????????

I'M SORRY 4 THE LONG POST....BUT I FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT THIS.....AND JUST WANTED TO MAKE MY POINT.....WITH FACTS TO BACK IT UP

give your opinion on this matter

Don Jacob:
yeah, i don't agree with killing innocent people but i don't think that's in our agenda, becuase in every war innocent people die (which sux about modern day warfar) but Sadam Husien has been warned and merely slapped on the wrist one too many times and over the years we've done a crappy or late job (which gave him more time to hide any weapons and bio warefare he might have) in trying to proove that he has this, i seriously don't think he'd have a problem with the UN servailing him unless he was hiding somethig...don't you? so yeah i think we should efficiently do our thing in afghanistan/pakistan FIRST and find Usama FIRST then try to tackle th Husein issue, then go the asian countries and get those terrrorists (which are probably more dangerous IMO)

Sikotic™:
I think they got connections to terrorism no doubt but we got people in our own country who have connections with terrorism. Take care of our own first and then worry about other peeps.

I don't like Bush stirring up shit in the Middle East and causing more conflict than necessary. He's just trying to get shit he wants and hiding it by saying it's the "War on Terrorism".

I'm really concerned cause as soon as Cheny leaves the Middle East some shit is probably gonna go down. And for what??

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page