Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Should the bball foul limit be raised?

(1/5) > >>

Tay:
I've heard this argument before, and am starting to really agree with it. Watching the NCAA Tourney so far, so many of the best players are missing time due to foul trouble and even fouling out, and a lot of these have been really soft fouls. If it was raised to the NBA level of 6, would we be treated to watch the better players compete throughout the entire game? This can apply to the NBA as well. The obvious response would be to tell these guys not to foul so much, but in some cases it is out of control due to easy layups, intentional fouls, and bad officiating. The one thing that's clear is that the fans want to see the best players on the court, and not sitting on the bench because of a questionable foul or 2.

OG Hack Wilson:
6 is enough


they used to make it 5

Tay:
What about college? You think it should stay the same, or be moved to 6?

DJ SUGAFREE QUIK:
Stay the same.  If they were true fans, they would watch regardless if the star player is still playing or fouled out.  If it sounds mean, i'm sorry.  It had 2 do with a couple of idiots on the radio in the mid 90's.  One said there should be 7 fouls in the nba, even though there were times in the mid 90's playoffs[where fixing games were starting to be a trend] when ewing, robinson & maybe some other would do 7-8 fouls when they're in foul trouble & the refs refuse to call them.  And another acts like they should not foul out the stars cause the star players are there for the fans. :loco:

Chamillitary Click:
stay the same!

i dont wanna see hacking!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page