Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Celtics 'shutting down' Garnett, likely until playoffs

<< < (2/6) > >>

S P I C E:
^^Cmon Hack I am not hating here and I am giving the Celtics props, they got their title last year!! Thats more then I can say about my Pacers LOL, I am just saying I dont think they will win another title with this core, I think I am being reasonable but if I was a Celtics fan I would definitely disagree so I know where you are coming from.
Cmon Hack do you think Celtics will repeat this year?

OG Hack Wilson:
we DEF need KG to play at 80% to win the title


i COULD see us losing to Cleveland but I still think we're the better team


until KG is out for the year i say we'll repeat.

thisoneguy360:

--- Quote from: S  P  I  C  E on March 31, 2009, 03:28:22 PM ---Celts are done, we all knew it was short term when they got KG and Allen and they got their title so props to them but they are done now.  Cavs would beat them this year even w/ KG at 100% IMO but now it will be really easy for Cavs.  Cavs and Lakers in Finals, man that is gonna be amazing.

--- End quote ---

I agree that the Celtics won't win another title but I wouldn't count them out as Eastern Conference champs.

Now_Im_Not_Banned:

--- Quote from: S  P  I  C  E on March 31, 2009, 03:28:22 PM ---Celts are done, we all knew it was short term when they got KG and Allen and they got their title so props to them but they are done now. 

--- End quote ---


on point

teecee:

--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on March 31, 2009, 03:51:22 PM ---we DEF need KG to play at 80% to win the title


i COULD see us losing to Cleveland but I still think we're the better team


until KG is out for the year i say we'll repeat.


--- End quote ---

On paper, the Cavs are not as good as the Spurs, Lakers, or Celtics.  Those teams each have three very good players, while the Cavs have arguably two and many good role players.  

If KG is only 80% though, the Celtics aren't getting close to a title.  

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version