Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
HBK and Taker just put on one of the greatest matches in Mania history
M Dogg™:
After watching the replay, I would put the 'Taker and HBk up there.
It was better than Hogan/Warrior, Hart/Piper, Angle/Benoit never happened one on one, it was better than HBK/Benoit/HHH, and a few other of those matches you mentioned. I think the match being in Texas helped with the crowd, as both are Texas boys, and the build up was almost old school like, so there was a lot going into this match, and both lived up to the hype. Not sure where I'd put it with Rock/Austin 2, Angle/Lesnar, Savage/Flair and the rest, but it was a great match.
Sikotic™:
--- Quote from: Mo Z. Dizzle on April 06, 2009, 07:42:45 AM ---
--- Quote from: A.G. on April 05, 2009, 10:43:55 PM ---i like TNA
the shit they do on there is raw
the younger no named wrestlers are like rey mysterio and they do some good shit
idk why it gets so much hate
its alot better then WWE SOMETIMES
--- End quote ---
Action wise, it usually is better.
But their storylines are horrible as well as the endings for matches...they tried copying the WWE and losst focus on what they were doing well. That's basically why they get the hate.
--- End quote ---
They have shitty psychology too. A lot of the young guys just do crazy spots the whole time. I tried to get into TNA, but they make the WWE's pathetic storylines look good.
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: King Sikotic II on April 06, 2009, 11:02:07 AM ---
--- Quote from: Mo Z. Dizzle on April 06, 2009, 07:42:45 AM ---
--- Quote from: A.G. on April 05, 2009, 10:43:55 PM ---i like TNA
the shit they do on there is raw
the younger no named wrestlers are like rey mysterio and they do some good shit
idk why it gets so much hate
its alot better then WWE SOMETIMES
--- End quote ---
Action wise, it usually is better.
But their storylines are horrible as well as the endings for matches...they tried copying the WWE and losst focus on what they were doing well. That's basically why they get the hate.
--- End quote ---
They have shitty psychology too. A lot of the young guys just do crazy spots the whole time. I tried to get into TNA, but they make the WWE's pathetic storylines look good.
--- End quote ---
TNA did everything that WCW and ECW did wrong. ECW was extreme spots, and TNA tries that, but can't get it right, WCW has those big names that even grandmas know, but can't market them, and then they have story lines like they are WWF, but they suck. TNA is like a crash of what went wrong in the 90's, and puts them in a 6 sided ring.
Kool Beenz:
--- Quote from: M Dogg on April 06, 2009, 03:15:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Sikotic II on April 06, 2009, 11:02:07 AM ---
--- Quote from: Mo Z. Dizzle on April 06, 2009, 07:42:45 AM ---
--- Quote from: A.G. on April 05, 2009, 10:43:55 PM ---i like TNA
the shit they do on there is raw
the younger no named wrestlers are like rey mysterio and they do some good shit
idk why it gets so much hate
its alot better then WWE SOMETIMES
--- End quote ---
Action wise, it usually is better.
But their storylines are horrible as well as the endings for matches...they tried copying the WWE and losst focus on what they were doing well. That's basically why they get the hate.
--- End quote ---
They have shitty psychology too. A lot of the young guys just do crazy spots the whole time. I tried to get into TNA, but they make the WWE's pathetic storylines look good.
--- End quote ---
TNA did everything that WCW and ECW did wrong. ECW was extreme spots, and TNA tries that, but can't get it right, WCW has those big names that even grandmas know, but can't market them, and then they have story lines like they are WWF, but they suck. TNA is like a crash of what went wrong in the 90's, and puts them in a 6 sided ring.
--- End quote ---
i really dont give a FUCK about any of the things you just mentioned
i watch wrestling to see the matches i could give 2 shits about marketing,story lines, who is fueding with who and what not
the matches are bad ass and the wrestlers are talented thats all that matters to me
M Dogg™:
--- Quote from: A.G. on April 06, 2009, 03:40:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: M Dogg on April 06, 2009, 03:15:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Sikotic II on April 06, 2009, 11:02:07 AM ---
--- Quote from: Mo Z. Dizzle on April 06, 2009, 07:42:45 AM ---
--- Quote from: A.G. on April 05, 2009, 10:43:55 PM ---i like TNA
the shit they do on there is raw
the younger no named wrestlers are like rey mysterio and they do some good shit
idk why it gets so much hate
its alot better then WWE SOMETIMES
--- End quote ---
Action wise, it usually is better.
But their storylines are horrible as well as the endings for matches...they tried copying the WWE and losst focus on what they were doing well. That's basically why they get the hate.
--- End quote ---
They have shitty psychology too. A lot of the young guys just do crazy spots the whole time. I tried to get into TNA, but they make the WWE's pathetic storylines look good.
--- End quote ---
TNA did everything that WCW and ECW did wrong. ECW was extreme spots, and TNA tries that, but can't get it right, WCW has those big names that even grandmas know, but can't market them, and then they have story lines like they are WWF, but they suck. TNA is like a crash of what went wrong in the 90's, and puts them in a 6 sided ring.
--- End quote ---
i really dont give a FUCK about any of the things you just mentioned
i watch wrestling to see the matches i could give 2 shits about marketing,story lines, who is fueding with who and what not
the matches are bad ass and the wrestlers are talented thats all that matters to me
--- End quote ---
To each their own. I'm just saying my opinion, and I am just saying TNA sucks. Outside of Samoa Joe, Sting and Kurt Angle, no one knows how to put on a match with real ring psychology.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version