Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

2009 Playoffs ~Los Angeles Lakers (65-17) vs Denver Nuggets (54-28)~ Round 3

<< < (55/62) > >>

Jaydc555:
And as far my comments being dumb about missing shots.Well you could say that every NBA analyst and everyone on this board is dumb because they say the same statements.

J.D. Wykid, Esq.:

--- Quote from: Jaydc555 on May 28, 2009, 12:42:16 AM ---And as far my comments being dumb about missing shots.Well you could say that every NBA analyst and everyone on this board is dumb because they say the same statements.

--- End quote ---

ive never heard anyone who gets paid to talk about sports say " X team would have won if they made more shots / scored more".  matter of fact..i dont think ive ever seen anyone on here make that type of statement. 

thats 1st grade logic homie.

for example...someone could say... "If the dodgers didnt move to LA, they would have stayed in brooklyn." ..it just goes without saying. 

the analyst and people here talk about why they didnt make the shots, or what they should of done to make the shots...not "they would have won had they scored more"...

----------------
Now playing on The KMPlayer: Ill Bill - Only Time Will Tell (Feat. Tech N9ne & Everlast) (Prod. By DJ Muggs)(The Hour Of Reprisal)
via FoxyTunes

Jaydc555:
You've never heard anyone say a team is missing open shots?or how many anti lebron people on this forum keep saying if he hadn't made the shot they would be down 3-0 in the series.

Jaydc555:
Actually I'm positive I hear every single game they use the percentage of shots made in their analyst of the game.Or during tonights game when they remarked that Denver was only 3 of their last 20 and that it cost them the game.

Jaydc555:
Besides the point your taking it out of context anyway.I was just rebutting whatever the guys names comment about lakers being unstoppable when odom plays well when if Denver had just made just a few more shots they would have won.Which is hardly an "unstoppable team"

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version