Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Anyone else tired of Lebron mania?
PLANT:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on May 29, 2009, 02:12:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 28, 2009, 03:54:02 PM ---^why's that?!? ???
that's what i still don't get, i didn't understand it from the first time the "Kobe vs. LeBron" arguement was raised.
just because the Lakers do better that means Kobe > LeBron?
yeah sure Lakers > Cavs, i don't know many who would disagree that; but what does that have to do with Kobe or LeBron?
lets say the Lakers take there series & the Cavs pull a miracle comeback, would you say Bynum > Dwight because the Lakers went farther?
if anyone is really that deep into denial where they think if the Cavs sat LeBron & the Lakers sat Kobe & the two teams played & you honestly thought the Cavs stood a chance, your nuts.
i would bet over a thousand dollars on the Lakers (w/o Kobe) against the Cavs (w/o LeBron); fact is LeBron does more than Kobe with less help around him.
it has nothing to do with who wins rings & shit; otherwise i guess Robert Horry is one of the best PF's ever lmao. :laugh:
--- End quote ---
leading your team to a championship is the ultimate accomplishment...if LeBron cant do it, then he's no Kobe. end of story.
--- End quote ---
well since SHAQ lead the Lakers to those titles....am I missing something? Has Kobe lead anyone to a title yet on his own? What LeBron is doing is far more impressive than anything Kobe has done in the post Shaq era.
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: PLANT on May 29, 2009, 02:56:03 PM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on May 29, 2009, 02:12:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 28, 2009, 03:54:02 PM ---^why's that?!? ???
that's what i still don't get, i didn't understand it from the first time the "Kobe vs. LeBron" arguement was raised.
just because the Lakers do better that means Kobe > LeBron?
yeah sure Lakers > Cavs, i don't know many who would disagree that; but what does that have to do with Kobe or LeBron?
lets say the Lakers take there series & the Cavs pull a miracle comeback, would you say Bynum > Dwight because the Lakers went farther?
if anyone is really that deep into denial where they think if the Cavs sat LeBron & the Lakers sat Kobe & the two teams played & you honestly thought the Cavs stood a chance, your nuts.
i would bet over a thousand dollars on the Lakers (w/o Kobe) against the Cavs (w/o LeBron); fact is LeBron does more than Kobe with less help around him.
it has nothing to do with who wins rings & shit; otherwise i guess Robert Horry is one of the best PF's ever lmao. :laugh:
--- End quote ---
leading your team to a championship is the ultimate accomplishment...if LeBron cant do it, then he's no Kobe. end of story.
--- End quote ---
well since SHAQ lead the Lakers to those titles....am I missing something? Has Kobe lead anyone to a title yet on his own? What LeBron is doing is far more impressive than anything Kobe has done in the post Shaq era.
--- End quote ---
not to mention, youre typically hearing over and over how Kobe has the better supporting cast. LeBron just knows how to get his teammates into the game better then Kobe does. They play better defense....why? Cus theyre involved in the offense lol
PLANT:
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 29, 2009, 03:00:45 PM ---
--- Quote from: PLANT on May 29, 2009, 02:56:03 PM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on May 29, 2009, 02:12:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 28, 2009, 03:54:02 PM ---^why's that?!? ???
that's what i still don't get, i didn't understand it from the first time the "Kobe vs. LeBron" arguement was raised.
just because the Lakers do better that means Kobe > LeBron?
yeah sure Lakers > Cavs, i don't know many who would disagree that; but what does that have to do with Kobe or LeBron?
lets say the Lakers take there series & the Cavs pull a miracle comeback, would you say Bynum > Dwight because the Lakers went farther?
if anyone is really that deep into denial where they think if the Cavs sat LeBron & the Lakers sat Kobe & the two teams played & you honestly thought the Cavs stood a chance, your nuts.
i would bet over a thousand dollars on the Lakers (w/o Kobe) against the Cavs (w/o LeBron); fact is LeBron does more than Kobe with less help around him.
it has nothing to do with who wins rings & shit; otherwise i guess Robert Horry is one of the best PF's ever lmao. :laugh:
--- End quote ---
leading your team to a championship is the ultimate accomplishment...if LeBron cant do it, then he's no Kobe. end of story.
--- End quote ---
well since SHAQ lead the Lakers to those titles....am I missing something? Has Kobe lead anyone to a title yet on his own? What LeBron is doing is far more impressive than anything Kobe has done in the post Shaq era.
--- End quote ---
not to mention, youre typically hearing over and over how Kobe has the better supporting cast. LeBron just knows how to get his teammates into the game better then Kobe does. They play better defense....why? Cus theyre involved in the offense lol
--- End quote ---
exactly
.:DaYg0sTyLz:.:
--- Quote from: PLANT on May 29, 2009, 03:03:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 29, 2009, 03:00:45 PM ---
--- Quote from: PLANT on May 29, 2009, 02:56:03 PM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on May 29, 2009, 02:12:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 28, 2009, 03:54:02 PM ---^why's that?!? ???
that's what i still don't get, i didn't understand it from the first time the "Kobe vs. LeBron" arguement was raised.
just because the Lakers do better that means Kobe > LeBron?
yeah sure Lakers > Cavs, i don't know many who would disagree that; but what does that have to do with Kobe or LeBron?
lets say the Lakers take there series & the Cavs pull a miracle comeback, would you say Bynum > Dwight because the Lakers went farther?
if anyone is really that deep into denial where they think if the Cavs sat LeBron & the Lakers sat Kobe & the two teams played & you honestly thought the Cavs stood a chance, your nuts.
i would bet over a thousand dollars on the Lakers (w/o Kobe) against the Cavs (w/o LeBron); fact is LeBron does more than Kobe with less help around him.
it has nothing to do with who wins rings & shit; otherwise i guess Robert Horry is one of the best PF's ever lmao. :laugh:
--- End quote ---
leading your team to a championship is the ultimate accomplishment...if LeBron cant do it, then he's no Kobe. end of story.
--- End quote ---
well since SHAQ lead the Lakers to those titles....am I missing something? Has Kobe lead anyone to a title yet on his own? What LeBron is doing is far more impressive than anything Kobe has done in the post Shaq era.
--- End quote ---
not to mention, youre typically hearing over and over how Kobe has the better supporting cast. LeBron just knows how to get his teammates into the game better then Kobe does. They play better defense....why? Cus theyre involved in the offense lol
--- End quote ---
exactly
--- End quote ---
the thing is, you know how Kobe gets others involved? He just shoots less lol. His assists still arent impressive...he just shoots less lol LeBron is that guy who can score 40...but still put up 10+ assists.
Chamillitary Click:
Lakers team now >>>> 3peat Lakers w/o Shaq.
if he can't do it now, then your argument is pointless.
to say Kobe lead them when Shaq average more points is nuts.
--- Quote ---Thats like saying Pippen lead the Bulls to 6 titles lol
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version